dark light

Scorpion82

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,381 through 1,395 (of 4,105 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 7 #2367098
    Scorpion82
    Participant

    @Eagle1,
    at the moment the Rafale won’t carry more than 4 AAMs in any AG configuration as the outer wing pylons aren’t cleared yet. But that’s already sufficient for the vast majority of scenarios.

    Wrt the Typhoon, the payload inflexibility is for large weapons. Carrying small and medium AG munitions up to the 1000 lb class is not problematic and these weapons were those planned for the Typhoon’s secondary AG role. With CFTs the aircraft would likely meet or even exceed the range performance of a Tornado, but they have yet to be integrated and it’s like ever a let’s wait and see how it will work out in the end. I’m not to optimistic, but without CFTs heavy weapons are not a real option for Typhoons anyway. That might be one of the reasons why such weapons aren’t integrated yet and their integration has seen repeated delays. We’ll see.

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2367168
    Scorpion82
    Participant

    @mrmalaya,
    the Rafale M usually carries just a single heavy weapon due carrier landing weight limitations. Two weapons of this kind would exceed bring back limit.

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2367198
    Scorpion82
    Participant

    @Nicolas,
    IIRC the 125 kg version of the AASM is not being purchased/introduced by the French military, but offered on export. I suppose there are no recent updates wrt the rocket pods and outer wing pylon clearance?

    in reply to: First women to fly Typhoon enforces No-Fly zone #2367356
    Scorpion82
    Participant

    +1 with Hurn
    most women in the military just want to do their job and want to be treated like everyone else. Making a big deal out of such a story is stupid media hype and is at best creating tensions.

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 7 #2367357
    Scorpion82
    Participant

    Don’t see where this article is particularly pro Typhoon or poking others. It looks quite neutral to me, concentrating on facts and quoting representatives.

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2367448
    Scorpion82
    Participant

    I thought it was shot down? Down from down?:diablo:

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread IV #2367703
    Scorpion82
    Participant

    The system onboard the EA-18G can hardly be described as self-defence. It’s an offensive system designed to support offensive operations and not for protecting its carrier in the first place.

    in reply to: Air Action Over Libya (Merged) #2367797
    Scorpion82
    Participant

    @eagle1,
    makes perfect sense for NTISR and if Damocles can generate target coordinates for AASMs it would be useful as well, especially with no troops on the ground to provide designation or target coordinates.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread IV #2367815
    Scorpion82
    Participant

    He believes… And reducing observability could mean that active transmissions are reduced by passive information gathering capabilities of the DASS for example or by its EMCON capabilities. I wouldn’t read to much in what’s being written.

    In the meantime I have updated my list on tranches, batches and blocks.
    Can be found here (opening post):
    http://typhoon.starstreak.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1610

    in reply to: Air Action Over Libya (Merged) #2367846
    Scorpion82
    Participant

    The UK MoD outlines the use of its Typhoons and Tornados:
    http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2011/03/22/354641/pictures-uk-outlines-typhoon-tornado-operations-against-gaddafi.html

    Not that the article states Typhoons from the No.3F and 17(R) sqns, while the image shows a 11F sqn aircraft. Until now I have only seen 3F & 11F sqn aircraft on the images released so far. I somewhat doubt that the No.6 sqn has deployed any of its aircraft, albeit it has been stated somewhere.

    in reply to: Air Action Over Libya (Merged) #2367964
    Scorpion82
    Participant

    Calm down and continue on topic!!!:mad:

    in reply to: Air Action Over Libya (Merged) #2368125
    Scorpion82
    Participant

    The RAF has a separate news page on the campaign.
    http://www.raf.mod.uk/news/Libya-OpELLAMY.cfm

    in reply to: Air Action Over Libya (Merged) #2368139
    Scorpion82
    Participant

    that is good news. There’s not a lot to do in the A2A arena so this must involve the dropping of bombs!!

    No it must not. Could have been a CAP or fighter escort mission.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread IV #2316111
    Scorpion82
    Participant

    It is usual that during the acceptance trials aircraft are fitted with WVR weapons. All Typhoons assembled at Warton are initially tested with ASRAAM, that include the Saudi examples, but they aren’t delivered with these weapons ;).

    Wrt Saudis and AMRAAM, just from a quick google search:

    On 29 September 2006, the US Air Force awarded Raytheon a $66 million procurement contract for 123 AIM-120C5 missiles, related services and equipment on behalf of Foreign Military Sales (FMS) to Saudi Arabia and Singapore. Deliveries were scheduled for completion November 2008 with the United States receiving 9 missiles.

    in reply to: Someone Besides Hot Dogs's F-35 Cyber News Thread #5 #2319514
    Scorpion82
    Participant

    What’s your point?

    I am showing you what the F-35A has actually cost (flyaway) from LRIP1-5. In each LRIP, the F-35 cost dropped from 10-20 million. In LRIP4 it came in at $126.8 (flyaway). For some reason you think that this consistent price drop will somehow come to a halt and that the F-35A will only drop 2-3 million per year. That is ignoring the F-35’s price history.

    Yes and in 2020 LM will pay its customers for taking delivery of the aircraft:diablo:

Viewing 15 posts - 1,381 through 1,395 (of 4,105 total)