dark light

rdc1000

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 1,226 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #323764
    rdc1000
    Participant

    Knowing my boss, I’l still work the same length of time, but will get 1.26 microseconds less in bed!

    in reply to: Good news – working day shorter! #1904864
    rdc1000
    Participant

    Knowing my boss, I’l still work the same length of time, but will get 1.26 microseconds less in bed!

    in reply to: Where will it go? #581551
    rdc1000
    Participant

    Over 700 houses will need to be bought for the scheme, not just for the land take of the runway, but also the accompanying terminal and PSZ’s (Public Saftety Zones), and for reasons of blight caused by proximity to the scheme.

    in reply to: 707 vs. DC-8 noise #581736
    rdc1000
    Participant

    Ah, the 707 and DC-8, when noise and pollution were not nearly as important factors as they are today.

    We have indeed come a very long way. Especialy when an engine of today with a diameter greater than that of the DC8 and 707 fuselages makes less noise than just one of their engines!

    Indeed, I just wish the environmental campaigners and NIMBY’s would acknowledge the leaps and bounds made by aviation in a relatively short time of jet operations, and would acknowledge the continued improvements going forward.

    I’m fairly certain the rate of fuel consumption improvement in cars has not improved at such a rapid rate by percentage.

    in reply to: Tommy's Question Thread #581974
    rdc1000
    Participant

    I love this thread, it’s so ridiculous and random! 😀

    in reply to: BA Cabin Crew Strike (Merged) #582001
    rdc1000
    Participant

    Well that might have something to do with the fact that I work in the industry (ok, not as cabin crew, but still!)

    Ditto…so I’m not sure that stacks up!

    Through my job I have an understanding of the business side of the industry, and understand the reasons behind the requirements of BA and my view that the cabin crew are going to do a lot more damage to their airline at this rate.

    in reply to: BA Cabin Crew Strike (Merged) #582213
    rdc1000
    Participant

    Indeed. Spot on.

    in reply to: BA Cabin Crew Strike (Merged) #582221
    rdc1000
    Participant

    Apologies if it sounded that way, but re-reading it, I think I was fairly clear in stating that if someone who knows more than I do from the inside would like to correct me, I am happy to be corrected.

    in reply to: BA Cabin Crew Strike (Merged) #582236
    rdc1000
    Participant

    But is your job as demanding or as important as cabin crew, do your daily actions and responsibilities affect the lives of every person you come into contact with?

    That’s a slightly naive view of life. Everybody has a role to play in society, and whilst in my job I may never have to evacuate an aircraft in an emergency I can confirm that (luckily) most cabin crew can spend a whole career not having to do that either. I’d like to to think when I carry out certain tasks, such as advising on multi-billion pound airport purchases, that this is slightly more challenging than asking “chicken or beef”. Don’t get me wrong, I’m the first to have respect for good quality customer service, but I do think you’ve got slightly carried away.

    Question…. Has management taken any cuts?
    Reduced salary?
    Less perks?

    What always amazes me across the world is how CEOs never reduce their salarys, pay themselves bonus’s when the compnay is going broke, get millions in a payout when they leave and all because they sacks 1000s.

    Even worse is when people support the CEOs, (mostly cause they are shareholders, therefor those scum workers better keep going on less and less wages to keep me shares up)… Sorry but I havent yet seen a CEO of any large company worth his salary or do any good deeds in the name of the company and its workers in a very long time.

    Fancy wanting more money and better conditions for its workers… how dare they!

    I’m not certain that you understand the issues here. BA management, including WW have taken huge hits financially, including pay freezes, and WW also gave up a month’s salary last year. The head count at Waterside has been culled dramatically in recent years, and I mean DRAMATICALLY. Furthermore, the pilots and ground crew at Heathrow are un uproar about this, they’ve accepted changes to their pay and conditions for the good of the company and many see the cabin crew as overpaid and underworked, its no wonder they have managed to find volunteers to train as cabin crew for the event of a strike. Much to the disgust of the Cabin Crew’s union, Unite, BALPA (the pilot’s union) won’t publicly support them, and for good reason!

    Through this dispute they want to impose pay freezes, new conditions for new staff, some new onboard structural changes, and promotional changes. Take these one by one…

    Pay freezes, well they can join the rest of the UK in accepting these as far as I’m concerned! I didn’t get a payrise last year, and unlikely to get one this year. I work in the aviation industry and have had to take a hit that many others have.

    New conditions for new staff: Well I don’t see the concern here, nobody that currently works for BA will be affected by whether or not a new employee chooses to accept a job offer made to them. FURTHERMORE, BA are still promising market rate PLUS 10% for new employees, so they’ll still be on market leading salaries, it’s just they won’t be on double what other airlines offer, as the current top BA cabin crew are.

    Onboard structural changes: So on a long haul flight the purser will now have to serve food and drinks, rather than simply manage the team on board that do normally. This will mean a reduction of 1 member of onboard crew, though as I understand it, no job cuts per-se, and over time this reduction will be felt through the natural disposal of staff (i.e. those that retire and leave through choice). This will not only bring the airline in line with other airlines, but will also bring the Heathrow operation in line with BA’s Gatwick long haul contracts which have been in force for a number of years, and where funnily enough, the staff cope just fine with it.

    Promotional changes: Including being promoted on merit, not time-served (well fancy that eh, goodness what a remarkable concept!), and less variance in the structure betweent he top and bottom of the cabin crew pile. This will only affect future promotions, so nobody will loose their current conditions.

    I notice that our usual contributing member of BA cabin crew hasn’t said anything. I think I’ve been para-phrasing and may have missed something out, so I am happy to stand corrected on any points.

    in reply to: BA Cabin Crew Strike (Merged) #582408
    rdc1000
    Participant

    My usual response to BA Cabin Crew strike annoucements..rearrange the following words..

    nose, off, face, spite, cutting, to, their

    Silly fools. 🙁

    in reply to: Tommy's Question Thread #583519
    rdc1000
    Participant

    How the heck is anyone supposed to know that?

    MAN-PMI could have been anything…B737/B727/B707/BAc-111/DC-8/Comet/ etc etc etc, there were a LOT of types in use then as there are now!

    The same applies to GRO!

    Quebec is probably easier, but still not completely possible as there were a plethera of airlines who may have operated it, although being a UK-Quebec flight it was most likely a charter operator such as National or Quebecair, rather than Air Canada. I would agree with Cockerhoop that a DC-8 would be a likely candidate, although not gauranteed, and could have been a B707.

    Information on the airlines would have been a helpful start, otherwise it’s a ludicrous question.

    I can tell you 3 answers with firm conviction if you like, because it’s not about knowing the answer, but how convinvingly you say it! :rolleyes:

    in reply to: AN225 COMUNG TO UK TODAY #479977
    rdc1000
    Participant

    Doncasters RWY 02/20 is the longest in UK. 🙁

    You mean if you exclude two runway at Heathrow, one at Gatwick, one at Stansted, one at East Midlands and two at Manchester?

    DSA has a runway length of 2893m, and that is the longest TORA too (in the 02 direction, shorter in the 20 direction).
    LHR meanwhile has runway lengths of 3901m and 3660m
    Gatwick has 3316m
    Stansted has 3048m
    Manchester has 1x 3048m and 1x 3047 (with a starter extension on two of the runways)
    East Midlands has the same as DSA with 2893m, but this is available in both directions, and the TODA is longer.

    in reply to: Manchester Airport changes phraseology after collisions #480711
    rdc1000
    Participant

    To be fair, with 361 passengers on board, the B737 probably tried to stop, but being so heavy rolled for longer than anticipated. The damage would ahve been worse I guess had Lufthansa had one of their full length A320’s in service that day, luckily they had removed a couple of air frame sections on that particular aircraft so the number of passenger involved was less.

    Gotta love the BBC!!! 😮

    I just re-read the article and noticed it was in relation to two incidents….it’s too early on a Monday morning for me. My bad! I could get away with a job at the BBC with that sort of poor attention to detail!

    in reply to: Manchester Airport changes phraseology after collisions #480712
    rdc1000
    Participant

    Aircraft involved in the two collisions in 2007 and 2008 were damaged, but none of the 468 passengers was hurt.

    The pilot of the Boeing 737….

    The confusion between the pilot and controllers led to the right winglet of the Tenerife-bound Boeing 737 hitting the tail of a 107-passenger Lufthansa Airbus A320 which had been due to fly to Frankfurt.

    Source: BBC News

    To be fair, with 361 passengers on board, the B737 probably tried to stop, but being so heavy rolled for longer than anticipated. The damage would ahve been worse I guess had Lufthansa had one of their full length A320’s in service that day, luckily they had removed a couple of air frame sections on that particular aircraft so the number of passenger involved was less.

    Gotta love the BBC!!! 😮

    in reply to: In search of days gone by – where in the world? #480717
    rdc1000
    Participant

    As far as I know Saha Air in Iran still operate the 707?

    Iran Air, once a week or something similar to that.

    As I said a trip to Iran would be necessary. However, I think I was wrong about there being an IL-18 operator in Iran.

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 1,226 total)