Here is the Have Blue comparison with MINIKITE !
http://www.f-117a.com/Have.html
Not as stealth as Have Blue, but less observable than many other ( I figure ). :very_drunk:
I am waiting for the order for these impatiently by the phone.
🙂
[ATTACH=CONFIG]235317[/ATTACH]
I notissed you changed this. A bit into SU-47 Berkut direction more.
What is the “pod” system a top ?
Ejection seat:
SKS-94M2 (speed 70 – 400 km / h, 28 kg weight)
KSS-42-4 (speed 0 – 850 km / h, 68 kg weight)
K-36L 3,5YA (speed 0 – 1,050 km / h, 86 kg weight)
Sounds like you got interested Paralay ( and someone else as well since we just hit past 70 000 clicks ).
SKS-94M2 would be accetable in the weight frame I am after. I know GSH-301 is a good gun but a bit too big ( few ammo ).
I think I am after a bit more versatile ac…which is 4½ ft longer than P-51D/SABA.
I’d put a dose of “blue” in it.
I had to check what B-8M1 was; http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/S-8_(Rakete) I bet that would be effective in CAS mode, but not very stealthy.
That is neat Paralay….about P-51D size.
Definatively ! Small, hard to see, but in larger numbers is the way to go. Less fuel burn until the big clash, when you put huge amount of planes in the air.
Glad to hear you dig it.
Some mods on this stealth .
Slight enhancement to make it go Mach 2.
There is also Arado E.381 the smallest ever fighter !
I am pretty sure a stealth fighter cannot be made any smaller than the MINIKITE is now…with AESA radar and 2 concealed AMRAAMS and 2 semiburied Sidewinders.
Only thing to really study now is to make the rocket engines work ( possibly hydrazine and no LOX ).
Here is the new canopy…and also the gear system has been solved in position vise. One AMRAAM less internally.
if it only have fuel for a few seconds then it will lose to any modern aircraft ( because it cant sustain turn or sustain climb with them) or any smart pilot ( because they will simply climb when they see the E. 381, after a few second they will have an easy kill
Rocket planes of that era typically had fuel/propellant for few minutes…BI-1 flew 15 minutes max.
It would have been an easy prey if the target had seen it coming.
I figure Me-163 flew 3-4 minutes on rockets and thereafter glided another 10-15 minutes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messerschmitt_Me_163_Komet
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wnwQcr8tnAw
The E.381 was supposedly designed to fly like them, but being jettisoned at high had more time to maneuver at the battle field ( 2-3 minutes perhaps ).
Soviet BI-1 was no less easy to operate; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLiYPWR3cLI
I just saw this….E.381 would have been in par with Mig-17 ( effective below 450 kts )…but only for few seconds ( 4-5 minutes max ).
Later ones not so much:
09 August 1952 One Hawker Sea Fury kills a MIG-15 with 20mm cannons.
10 September 1952 One F4U-4B (USMC) kills a MIG-15 with 0.50cal.
20 June 1965: Two A-1H share a kill of a MIG-17 with 20mm cannons.
09 October 1966 One A-1H kills a MIG-17 with 20mm cannons.This was posted on another board by another person:
It was also noted that less than half of the Me-262s shot down were taking off or landing – most were hit by multiple Allied fighters while attacking bomber formations. Hard to evade 4-5 fighters at the same time, even if they are slower, if they are between you and your destination/target.
I had no idea Skyraider flew already early 1945; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_A-1_Skyraider
If you read carefully the E.381 was able to sustain massive G-loads and went ( on paper ) 900 km/h…that is considerably faster than a piston fighter at the end of WW III. Does that make a difference ?
It’s radar signature could be reduced, but not be made “invisible”.
If you are talking about a brand new aircraft of this size bulit in 2015 with the most modern stealth materials, yes you could reduce the radar signature quite significantly with proper design, shaping, materials, and coatings. Perhaps you would end up with something quite similair in shape and size to some modern stealth cruise missiles, which are quite stealthy. Small size does help in this regard.
If you are talking about taking a E381, or trying to reduce radar signature in the WWII time frame, you could make some radar reduction efforts, but not much. You just can’t coat RAM on something and make it invisible to radar.
All right sandiego89 !
It was really small.
I thought it was guns, at least that was the story on dogfights.
I think it was an A4 that got a kill using Zuni rockets.
Yes, it would be detectable by most search radars, even WWII era sets. Many radars can pick up smaller objects such as small aircraft, missiles, even birds, rain etc. The E.381 was smallish, but had plenty of metal and some slab surfaces, so would provide plenty for a radar return.
Okay then…what about if it was made that size, but has stealth shape and RAM coating ? Would it become invisible ?
Is radar able to detect a small craft like that Arado E.381 ?
I remember P-51Ds scored several Me-262s. Has that happened since that, prop plane shooting down a jet aircraft ?
What ever happend to the sole MiG 1.42 prototype?
It never left the drawing board ?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]235253[/ATTACH]