dark light

MarkG

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 718 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Ya gotta love livin' in California #1264350
    MarkG
    Participant

    Any Brits going to attempt to pronounce Cahuenga? 😀

    Tell you what, I’ll have a go at Cahuenga if you have a crack at Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch 😀

    in reply to: Complete Vampire on Ebay ? #1264473
    MarkG
    Participant

    anyone know the fate of the Vampire T11 that resided on the gate at RAF Swinderby. Fond memories marching past it under loving gaze of the DIs

    Martin

    It’s alive and well but currently stored at Staverton for the temporarily closed Jet Age Museum.

    Clicky here.

    in reply to: Complete Vampire on Ebay ? #1266195
    MarkG
    Participant

    Yes, the Vampire pods were constructed in exactly the same way as the Mosquito – over wood or concrete formers and in two halves that were glued together like an Airfix model!

    No steam/water was used in shaping the wood though. The inner skin of ply was laid over the former in appropriately shaped sections, i.e. larger sheets where there were no complex curves, and thinner strips where double-curvature existed. This inner skin was glued, pinned and screwed to internal bulkheads, ply doublers etc. and scarfed together to completely cover the former. Balsa filler strips were then shaped and glued over the top and the whole lot clamped down with metal straps which covered the whole surface. These straps had a series of holes in them so that the wood surface could be pricked to release surplus glue. Once that was dry, the clamps were removed and the outer ply skin added using the same techniques as the inner. That was then clamped with straps to dry.

    The result was a strong, light composite shell constructed with exactly the same principles as modern composite stuff like racing car monocoques – only difference being ply-balsa-ply sandwich replaced with carbonfibre-aluminium honeycomb-carbonfibre.

    The interior of the wooden shell was then drilled in the appropriate locations and wood or metal inserts fitted for the various internal fittings to be attached to. Then, once certain fittings are installed, the two halves are glued/screwed together.

    The wooden surface is later covered with fabric and doped. Layers of aluminium dope is then applied and the whole thing painted/lacquered as required. It’s this fabric/dope covering that’s so vital to protecting the wood. If that is compromised then moisture gets under it and rots the wood.

    in reply to: Rubbish on eb*y #1266625
    MarkG
    Participant

    Pssst….wanna buy a Sopwith Camel ejector seat, Mark? Andy Saunders

    Oooh yes please, and I’ll pay you with a wad of 9-bob notes!

    in reply to: Rubbish on eb*y #1266729
    MarkG
    Participant

    Yeah- I seen a “Genuine” Spitfire Machmeter offered on Ebay not so long ago!-seems that if it fits on an old plane it fits on a spit!-The Machmeter in question was made 15 years after the last Spit was manufactured-and the vendor swore blind that a subsonic piston engined fighter was capable of over Mach 1!-Told him to go ask Col Chuck Yeagher about that one.

    I reckon I can beat that – a while ago I saw a cabin altimeter for…a Swordfish!!!
    So that’s an instrument used to indicate the level of cockpit pressurisation in an open-cockpit aeroplane! Priceless!

    in reply to: Most beautiful jet #1269110
    MarkG
    Participant

    Hawker’s by producing the Hunter made the question somewhat irrelevant…

    Couldn’t agree more! 😀

    in reply to: Last Shoreham….Possibly!! #1273728
    MarkG
    Participant

    See you there – no matter what the weather!

    in reply to: Backstage at the Interlaken Rock Festival #1274192
    MarkG
    Participant

    Wonder waht the story is on this one? looks in good nick but appears engineless? What was the interior of the cockpit like?

    No way to tell if it’s engineless from those photos.

    F.58 J-4018 was a new-build, i.e. not a refurbished example, delivered in Feb 1959. Eventually retired in Aug 1992 and put on display at Interlaken AFB maintained by Hunterverein. By 2002 it was owned by RUAG Aerospace – not sure if it still is, but judging by those pictures someone is looking after it even if they’re not cutting the grass!

    in reply to: WW11? 'composite?' seat on ebay. #1281172
    MarkG
    Participant
    in reply to: Last Shoreham….Possibly!! #1283545
    MarkG
    Participant

    I agree with all you say! We are “fixed” on March and september. Period. Redhill is also being considered and we have been talking to Alistair White at Acebell Aviation about this. Headcorn and Lydd are probably too remote. Good and direct road links are essential. Brooklands, Redhill and Rochester all meet the criteria, here. Andy Saunders

    I’m saddened by the possible demise of Shoreham as it was getting to the point where it was the only aerojumble still worth attending regularly! For what they’re worth, I would offer the following observations.

    – Headcorn, Lydd, in fact anywhere in Kent are way, way too remote. I would also suggest that Rochester is also not ideal being the ‘wrong’ side of London for large sections of the country. Frankly, Shoreham was pushing it geographically for many people but at least the routes there from many directions are generally free of M25-style horrors.

    – Brooklands, I believe, would be an excellent location and, hopefully, the fact that an aerojumble was held there earlier this year will ‘oil the wheels’. I know a couple of people at Brooklands and will get in touch to see if they can apply any influence.

    – As has already been said, it should be made very clear that this ‘new’ jumble is the ‘old’ Shoreham so people know it’s not a new jumble which are notoriously difficult to get going.

    – Current dates are perfect as, in general, they don’t clash with anything.

    – Yes, eBay can be very useful. I have obtained a number of items for my projects that way that I have never seen anywhere else. Having said that, eBay can never replace the ability to rummage through boxes of bits and bobs, for example, that a jumble offers. It can never replace the ‘community’ that exists amongst like-minded people and the ability to meet, exchange information and ideas and to generally ‘network’ with others.

    I do hope something can be sorted out. Although I’ve grumbled about what’s become of some jumbles in the past, I still look forward to attending them all.

    in reply to: General Discussion #351796
    MarkG
    Participant

    Sorry Moggy, you fail to understand so I will type this slowly for you

    PLEASE POST SPECULATION, THEORY AND CONJECTURE SOMEWHERE ELSE, NOT ON THIS THREAD.

    Not sure why you constantly feel the need to be so sanctimonious about things like this.

    This is a discussion forum isn’t it?

    Speculate, wonder and discus is what people do. It’s human nature. Get over it.

    in reply to: Richard Hammond seriously hurt (merged). #1945820
    MarkG
    Participant

    Sorry Moggy, you fail to understand so I will type this slowly for you

    PLEASE POST SPECULATION, THEORY AND CONJECTURE SOMEWHERE ELSE, NOT ON THIS THREAD.

    Not sure why you constantly feel the need to be so sanctimonious about things like this.

    This is a discussion forum isn’t it?

    Speculate, wonder and discus is what people do. It’s human nature. Get over it.

    in reply to: Bader thread split, moved and closed? I disagree. #1287382
    MarkG
    Participant

    In addition, any microscopic shred of credibility Mr. Williams’ story had was completely negated by his aggressive, obnoxious, rude and insulting manner with anyone who (quite understandably) showed the slightest glimmer of doubt as to it’s authenticity.

    I’d forgotten quite how unpleasant the fellow could be until now.

    You must also question the mental state of anyone who can mistake Stuart Gowans for a school-kid! 😀 Oh, how I laughed! 😀 😀

    Sorry Stuart! See you at Shoreham? (assuming your Mum will let you go of course :p )

    in reply to: USAAF/RAF aircrew survival rifle .22? #1300730
    MarkG
    Participant

    It is interesting to note that the British Army goes into combat with the SA80 which is just .223 calibre, and this against slightly more aggressive targets than bunnies.

    Mind you, as it frequently fails to go ‘bang’ anyway it doesn’t make a lot of difference.

    Moggy

    I’m no balistics expert but I believe the small calibre rounds of the SA80 and M16 are effective because they have less rifling-induced ‘spin’ applied to them. This means that upon hitting a target they have much less of a tendancy to want to keep going through it and will start to ‘tumble’ almost immediately, thereby delivery all their kinetic energy to the target (and doing damage due to the tumble) rather than using the energy trying to keep ‘drilling’ through. The downside is that if the round hits something during its flight, like bushes or leaves etc., it is much more likely to tumble and go off target.

    in reply to: Hawker Hunter up-a-stick #1301626
    MarkG
    Participant

    Lovely!

    (dodgy roundels under the wings though!)

Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 718 total)