a fat belly is associated with prosperity and good feelings in eastern cultures.
in a defensive battle it may be feasible for defending infantry to
take over terminal lasing for the Hermes (a la Copperhead) but
for offensive fastmoving ops isnt it better the Launch platform get a Arbalets++ MMW radar and guide it all the way?
B58 Hustler.
Folland Gnat (small but quite a pest as Sabre pilots found)
is there ample time for Tikhomirov to come up with a downsized
model. 5 years ?
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/497471.cms
India set to test-fire Agni-III this year: Fernandes
PTI[ SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 2004 10:25:55 AM ]
NEW DELHI : India is all set to test-fire this year its new longer-range ‘Agni-III’ surface-to-surface missile capable of carrying nuclear weapons.
“Yes, the missile should be test-fired this year. We have so far not zeroed in on any date for its launch. This is just the beginning of the year,” Defence Minister George Fernandes said here.
On whether the missile would have a strike range of over 3,000 km, Fernandes said “I will not make any commitment on that”.
He also parried a question if the missile would be test-fired from a mobile launcher like other such weapons in the country’s arsenal. “At the appropriate time one will know about it”.
India has already operationalised 700-km range Agni-I and 2000-km range Agni-II, which are both capable of carrying nuclear weapons. Agni-III is being developed to have a range longer than Agni-II.
Replying to questions on acquisition of ‘Phalcon’ airborne surveillance systems, Fernandes said a memorandum of understanding has been reached with Israel and Russia and “things are moving”. The Phalcon system would be mounted on a Russian-made IL-series aircraft.
“We are producing our own airborne warning and control system. Work is on for the production of indigenous AWACS,” he said.
Development of indigenous AWACS had received a set back following the crash of a HS-748 transport aircraft with a mounted rotodome near Chennai sometime back. “The technology that was developed did not get lost,” Fernandes said.
On his decision to eliminate middlemen from defence deals in the context of Tehelka expose on arms purchases, he said, “to the extent possible the role of the middlemen have been eliminated.
whats all the smudges around the trees and helo ? PS pawprints?
old news. doesnt deserve a new thread. there is a “indian af
news and discussion” thread.
that Jag from RAF force in Oman ? I have seen a short video of
another such run by same formation probably.
china can quickly scare the USN by building some 5 20kt austere
helicopter carriers and equipping them with a ton of NH90s purchased from France with the latest ASW kits. AAW protection
from ships like the 052C.
once the US SSN threat is pushed back, their ships will also feel
unsafe from chinese subs.
this will create relatively safer areas for PLAN SSGNs off the
coast to unleash full volleys against CVBGs with MKK2s adding in
Moskits to the mix.
aviationnow.com
JSF Could See Major Changes In Coming Months, Officials Say
By Marc Selinger
February 17, 2004
ORLANDO, Fla. – The coming months could reveal significant changes for the Defense Department’s F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program, according to government and industry officials.
During the F-35’s first critical design review in April, prime contractor Lockheed Martin expects to learn more about how DOD wants to resolve the aircraft’s weight problems, company officials said Feb. 12 at the Air Force Association’s (AFA) 20th annual air warfare symposium here. Orville Prins, vice president of business development at Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co., said the company has identified “more than 100 ideas” for slimming JSF.
“We know there will be an impact [from the weight issue], and we’re working through that,” Prins told reporters.
The unwanted pounds already have led DOD to delay the purchase of a small fraction of the 2,443 aircraft it plans to acquire for the Air Force, Marine Corps and Navy. About 70 JSFs that were slated for procurement by fiscal 2009 will now be bought in FY ’10 or beyond. The delay is intended to ensure the program has enough time to resolve the aircraft’s weight problems.
William McHenry, Lockheed Martin’s vice president of business development for the F-35, said that 1,000 to 2,000 pounds is the “magnitude of the problem.”
Pentagon officials, including Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld (DAILY, Jan. 15), have said that such weight challenges are common for aircraft under development.
Air Force Secretary James Roche and Gen. John Jumper, Air Force chief of staff, added even more dynamic to the JSF program by confirming at the AFA symposium that the Air Force wants to buy the Marine Corps’ short takeoff and vertical landing (STOVL) JSF to complement the Air Force’s own conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL) version (DAILY, Feb. 13). There had been indications for more than a month that the Air Force had a growing interest in the STOVL variant (DAILY, Jan. 6).
AF eyes STOVL
Roche and Jumper said recent military operations have underscored the value of the STOVL JSF, which would aid the Air Force’s close-air-support mission by allowing it to use runways that are not in great condition but that are located near U.S. ground forces.
“It would give us access to many more runways that we find” in today’s operations, Jumper said.
Roche noted that the Air Force’s STOVL idea still needs to go through the regular budget and planning process.
Gen. Hal Hornburg, commander of Air Combat Command, has been tasked with studying the STOVL issue, including the right mix of CTOL and STOVL variants. The Air Force currently is slated to buy 1,763 CTOLs.
Roche also revealed the Air Force plans to look at blending active and reserve forces to gain efficiencies, a move that could change the number of JSFs the Air Force needs to buy.
Roche said the Air Force intends to upgrade some of its old but rugged A-10 Thunderbolt II close-air-support aircraft, which could serve as a “bridge” to the STOVL JSF. A still-to-be-determined number of A-10s will undergo a sensor system upgrade, re-engining and service life extension.
the 767 M2CA/MESA type a/c should be able of more hard moves than old rotodome E3.
does KS-172 has both a active and passive radar seeker ?
if it is quietly homing in on the AWACS emission, the E3 will see
it coming and say at 10km away shut the radar for a few
minutes and take a turn. home on emission will not work then.
the KS172 starts its own radar and reacquires the E3 which
deploys a mix of chaff, radar jamming and towed decoys from
the wingtips aided by similar stuff from the escorting fighters.
the escorts can fire quick reaction missiles like AIM9X/IRIST and
ASRAAM at the large lumbering KS172 which is flying very fast
but essentially in a straight line at that stage. theres a good chance the AAMs will kill the KS172.
is that how the engagement will work ?
De Havilland Mosquito or Bristol Beaufighter at work.
Sopwith Camel for recreation.
how are the CVNX and DDX programs going ? is the CVN77 on
schedule with the EM cats and all ?
I recall reading in some aviation mag last week an article on
Tornado F3. said due to problems with FoxHunter radar the F3
was flying with ballast in the nose few initial years.
if that is true could anyone provide details or pointer?