dark light

Spitfire9

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 2,413 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Military Aviation News #2145306
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    Bulgarian fighter replacement

    Sofia released a request for proposals for the requirement in December 2016, seeking an initial eight fighters to be procured through a government-to-government agreement.

    The defence ministry’s current plan foresees an investment of €767 million ($823 million) to acquire the aircraft and ground support equipment, plus a small package of air-to-air and air-to-surface weapons, logistics support and personnel training.

    I would think that the package is impossible at that price, whether it be second hand F-16’s needing an upgrade or new Gripen C’s. Perhaps the supply of Italian tranche 1 Typhoons for next to nothing would make it possible within the budget.

    https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/bulgaria-receives-responses-in-fighter-contest-435226/

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2145716
    Spitfire9
    Participant
    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2148178
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    With regard to the Sukhoi “mistake”, the linked article says:

    India has now laid down two essential prerequisites for the FGFA project, apart from examining its entire cost-effectiveness. One, there should be extensive technology transfer, including the “source codes”, to ensure India can in the future upgrade the fighter with integration of new weapons on its own. Two, it should directly help the indigenous FGFA project called the advanced medium combat aircraft (AMCA), the preliminary design work for which is now under way, as was earlier reported by TOI.

    What’s the deal here? This sounds like very vague thinking to me. TOT for FGFA is one thing. TOT for AMCA is a different thing. TOT for FGFA may not be directly applicable to the AMCA at all.

    in reply to: Finland Air Force #2148346
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    Sweden export equipment to Middleast can easily be compromise and with limited scientific capability they can’t produce diversification and limited economics does not allow expensive imports.

    I think you will find that where weapons sales are concerned, Sweden suffers from a condition that is absent in USA, Russia, France, UK. Its weapons exports policy is ethical. As far as I know it refuses to supply weapons to Saudi Arabia due to human rights abuses etc.

    in reply to: Korea's KF-X: News & Discussion #2148377
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    With the LRIP 10 contract, 373 F-35’s (all types) are currently on firm order (200+ out of those have been delivered). This year the JPO intends to definitize the LRIP-11 contract which would bring the total ordered between 450-500+ range (don’t know LRIP 11 off the top of my head). Additionally, LRIP 12 advanced funding is also going to be released this year which should take this number to beyond 600.

    Thing is that while the USA could cancel all further F-35’s at any time (including contracted lots), short of declaring production of F-35 illegal, LM will deliver several hundred more frames. Enough to go way past 500.

    in reply to: Korea's KF-X: News & Discussion #2148615
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    Something strikes me about the Korean/Indonesian, Indian, Turkish projects 5G projects. They all need TOT and because they are different projects, there will be multiple payments for TOT. There is a constraint on development costs for all these projects. I hear a report that the Turkish military is not enthusiastic about the Turkish project, being concerned that it will take up too much of the military budget. Cost overruns are the norm for these types of project. It would be sad if some of these projects were delayed by many, many years or even eventually abandoned due to lack of funding. Would it not have been more sensible to agree a useable (ideal for none) design and to build it together.

    I expect the response saying that it would not meet the specifications of the different armed forces but overall I think that compromising on specifications to save money actually increases the capability of an armed force because other equipment that could not be afforded within the budget becomes affordable.

    Another thing: suppose India selects a higher thrust version of GE-F414 for the AMCA (and pays for its development), that means Korea or Turkey could then select the same engine without having to pay for its development. I know the KF-X project is more advanced so it’s more likely Korea would be paying for the thrust increase but you get the idea.

    in reply to: Finland Air Force #2148643
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    The role of the Western media in fomenting Russophobia you do not consider?

    Russia began to live better without the “younger brothers”. These countries could remain neutral, they were never threatened. Now they are under the gun, my congratulations

    Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania have good reason to worry about Russia. Putin created chaos in Ukraine. All he needed to do was to tell the Ukraine people in the east of the country to vote for re-unification with Russia before doing this and many, many lives could have been saved. It was clear that the majority of the people in the east of the Ukraine would have voted for re-unification with Russia and this could have happened in a peaceful way if Putin had been a responsible leader.

    in reply to: Korea's KF-X: News & Discussion #2148654
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    Just when projects like this look like they are being mothballed, they pop up again. Korea, Japan, Turkey and the UAE project are all putting the squeeze on F 35 production numbers.

    I think Pierre Sprey is going to be right. There won’t be more than 500 F-35’s built.

    I don’t know when Pierre Sprey made this prediction but with Israel, Japan and a number of European countries having opted for F-35, I see his prediction more or less as an impossibility. Trump would have to cancel F-35 for less than 500 to be built. Even then LM could switch all production to supplying non-US customers. With 200+ already delivered the non-US orders would take F-35 production way past 500 units.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2150189
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    Belgium’s a cert IMO due to the Netherlands ordering F-35. Only way I see there not being a deal is if LM tries to squeeze too much money out of what appears to me to be a captive customer.

    Switzerland? Perhaps it’s good to talk but not much point to me. Too expensive and all that is needed is a good interceptor that does not cost a fortune to run.

    Re: Spain – would F-35B be to replace Harriers?

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2159053
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    Rusia to co-develop 5th gen light fighter with UAE

    Rostec of Russia is to co-develop a 5th generation light fighter with UAE ministry of defence.

    – based on Mig-29

    – production “anticipated” to take place in UAE

    http://www.defensenews.com/articles/russias-rostec-to-co-develop-5th-gen-fighter-with-uae

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2163480
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    First civilian to supercruise!!! Beat me to it. 🙁 But the I guess someone had to be first. 🙂

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2165047
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    Rumour(?) on facebook:

    India’s Minister of Defence reported to have said that Gripen would be made in India.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2167355
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    Why does not SAAB sue BAE Systems, too. BAE was involved in marketing Gripen at the time but surprise, surprise Typhoon got the deal even though Gripen would have been a much better choice for Austria.

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2167422
    Spitfire9
    Participant
    in reply to: KF-X/IF-X & TF-X for Europe? #2171363
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    Thats correct. Right now no one in Europe is considering the TF-X. But I didn’t assert this. I said once BAE Systems and TAI complete the pre-design phase European nations may decide to join the TF-X program.

    Yes, that is possible. Many would see that as risky, too, due to Turkey being somewhat unstable (got a civil war going on; recent attempted coup d’état; head of state altering constitution to something more like dictatorship). And what if the Islamic fundamentalists (no freedom except what Sharia allows) gain power in Turkey? Will agreements with infidels continue?

    [QUOTE=Bayar;2374008]Thats correct. Right now no one in Europe is considering the TF-X. But I didn’t assert this. I said once BAE Systems and TAI complete the pre-design phase European nations may decide to join the TF-X program.

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 2,413 total)