dark light

Spitfire9

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 2,413 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Military Aviation News #2130858
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    White House Approves Fighter Sales to Qatar, Bahrain and Kuwait

    The package reportedly includes 72 Boeing F-15E Strike Eagles for Qatar and up to 40 Boeing F/A-18 E/F Super Hornets for Kuwait. Bahrain’s package includes Lockheed Martin F-16 fighters.

    http://www.defensenews.com/articles/white-house-approves-jet-sales-to-qatar-bahrain-and-kuwait-corker

    Apart from UAE, would this signal the end of any hope of selling the eurocanards to the gulf?

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2132666
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    Where did you get that 640 mph @ 36000′? The figures I’ve seen it given as 663 mph, i.e. 1067 kph, or 1070 kph at 11000m. That makes 2495 kph about M2.33-2.34.

    From the numbers I remember as a kid. Obviously the high altitude figure I read was wrong. My mistake for not checking.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2132869
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    2495 km/h = mach 2.35 at 11000m?

    Yes, that does not seem right to me. I checked using 640mph = mach 1 @ 36,000ft and I got 2495kph=mach 2.436

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2138560
    Spitfire9
    Participant
    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2138562
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    I was hoping for Liberator.

    Not sure that something that could be used to wipe out hundreds of thousands / millions of civilians could be seen as some kind of liberator.

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2140586
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    Thailand to buy more Gripens?

    …the new Thai Air Force chief is expected to consider buying another four Saab JAS 39 Gripen fighters to add to an existing squadron of a dozen multi-role combat aircraft of the same type from Sweden.

    The Air Force has 12 Gripen fighters at Air Wing 7 in the southern Surat Thani province. The Gripen squadron was procured in 2008 to replace the U.S.-made F-5E Tiger fighters.

    The Swedish fighter is reported to cost about 69 million U.S. dollars per unit.

    http://www.defense-aerospace.com/articles-view/release/3/177056/thailand-looks-for-c_130h-replacement%2C-more-gripens.html

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2152064
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    Read the article…

    One of two things is happening here. Either the F-35s are regenerating their missiles as suggested by FBW, or the “27 kills” aren’t for a single F-35 but rather a flight of F-35s or potentially even a mixture of F-35s and other aircraft.

    This isn’t some kind of conspiracy on the part of the USAF to claim the F-35 has “supernatural powers,” it is just a poorly written sentence that leaves its exact meaning unclear.

    My bad for not realising the writer was not referring to a single F-35. Like you say, though, was a bit of a vague way of saying what he said.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2152113
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    I love the butthurt comment from Defense Aerospace…

    http://www.defense-aerospace.com/articles-view/release/3/176587/usaf-hypes-f_35a%2C-claims-%E2%80%9C27-kills-in-a-single-sortie%E2%80%9D.html

    So are they just children or what?

    scoring as many as 27 kills in a single sortie

    So, was it 4 kills with A2A missiles + 23 with cannon on this sortie? Theoretically possible if the cannon were operational but it’s not yet, is it? In other words, this does sound like bunk (at least to me). Can anyone offer any explanation as to how the claim of 27 kills in a sortie could possibly be true?

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2163264
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    Govt seeks 134 million euro waiver from France for Rafale deal

    http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/govt-seeks-134-million-euro-waiver-from-france-for-rafale-deal/story-DgoAO9sZW5g44rSkl0t8OO.html

    What is the nature of the guarantee requiring this advance payment?

    Spitfire9
    Participant

    I think the “(b) shut the force down and start again later” option meant a complete shut down, as in disposing of the aircraft, not just grounding them until money permits resuming operations.

    Yes, I meant ceasing all activity involved with supporting a fighter force along the lines of scrapping the fleet of old aircraft which the available budget can no longer keep flying and dismantling the support structure (pilots, mechanics etc) needed to keep fighters flying.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2164562
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    JF-17 appears to be off the table (thank goodness). More importantly, we are broke right now. People are going to be royally pissed if the govt spends hundreds of millions of dollars on combat A/C. Even our disabled war-vets protested the lack of support recently. Not supporting your vets is literally sacrilege in any nation. China could give us for free fighters similar to F-7BGI. Even the F-7GS armed with PL-5E were gifts.

    So, unless the the Chinese gives us further upgraded J-7G variants (hypothetical F-7GSI++) or US gives use some 2nd hand F-16 along with training and support for free, I don’t know how the SLAF is going get new fighters. They better not spend $100+ million on fancy new jets or I myself will be pelting a few eggs and vegetables at our politicians. A far more re-conciliatory move would be to use that money to compensate disabled LTTE combatants and war-widows. There are thousands of war widows in the north alone.

    Do you propose that the fighter component of the air force be shut down for a time? That reminds me of the Brits (I’m one of them) scrapping fixed-wing carrier operations for a few years.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2165508
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    As Combat Aircraft Fleet Atrophies, Sri Lanka Seeks New Fighters

    Down to

    1/7 Kfir operational
    0/7 MiG-27 operational

    according to the article at http://www.defense-aerospace.com/articles-view/release/3/176259/as-combat-aircraft-fleet-atrophies%2C-sri-lanka-seeks-new-fighters.html

    Which manufacturers/governments are likely to come to the rescue? Has France got any F1’s due for retirement? Is the Swedish government prepared to part with any Gripens? Is China most likely to be the supplier?

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2189093
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    Know next to nothing about stealth but I thought that canards were not good in terms of trying to reduce observability. How come some people judge J-20 less observable that PAK-FA?

    in reply to: how will Brexit impact UK Aviation? #2195405
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    When the GBP goes down 15%, then your imports get 15% more expensive and your added value (material, work, system integration) gets 15% cheaper.. The only items which do get 15% cheaper on export are those with 100% British content.. On the contrary, any item with British content being less than 50% (a majority, IMHO) gets even more expensive.. Now add 8% tax + VAT and you get the final export cost..

    VAT is not charged on exports.

    in reply to: how will Brexit impact UK Aviation? #2196916
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    I’ve attended election counts, from close of voting to declaration, & Tony’s right. Fixing the count itself is just not on.

    I also have friends who’ve run polling stations, who’d be happy to describe the other checks. Among them are precautions against meddling with the ballot boxes, such as the expected arrival times of ballot boxes, notifications of when they leave the polling stations, etc. Ballot boxes are sealed before the start of polling, & representatives of parties (or accredited campaigns) can be & often are present, checking that the boxes are empty before the voting starts. The apertures for inserting ballots are closed at the end of polling, & parties may & often do add their own seals then. You’d have to intercept the boxes, open them, change enough papers to make a difference, re-seal the boxes with matching seals (people who added seals will be there when they’re unsealed) & do it all fast enough that they’re not suspiciously late getting to the count. And do all that thousands of times, all over the country, without anyone noticing or any of the thousands of people involved leaking it.

    I lived in a one party state with a dictator in charge once. To humour western democracies the experiment of multipartyism was tried on one occasion. The opposition were trounced everywhere. In my constituency 104% of the electorate voted for the dictator’s party candidate. Moral: you don’t need to alter ballot papers – you just need to add loads with an ‘x’ next to the ‘right’ candidate.

Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 2,413 total)