dark light

Derekf

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 601 through 615 (of 1,281 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #257406
    Derekf
    Participant

    Ah yes.. nostalgia isn’t what it used to be.

    Let’s face it, some of those old cartoons were rubbish. Poor animation and non-stories. Why not update them and make them more relevant to todays kids?

    Also the 2005 remake of Captain Scarlet was brilliant. It even had the BBMF Lancaster in one episode.

    in reply to: BBC drops a Clanger? #1858616
    Derekf
    Participant

    Ah yes.. nostalgia isn’t what it used to be.

    Let’s face it, some of those old cartoons were rubbish. Poor animation and non-stories. Why not update them and make them more relevant to todays kids?

    Also the 2005 remake of Captain Scarlet was brilliant. It even had the BBMF Lancaster in one episode.

    in reply to: John Lewis. ex Chief Pilot, Shuttleworth Collection #995606
    Derekf
    Participant

    That is sad news. I had the pleasure of flying with John a couple of times in the mid 90s.

    in reply to: Biggin A26 – And spectators who watch but don't contribute #997578
    Derekf
    Participant

    Also worth pointing this out as well.

    http://www.pcworld.com/article/2053900/eu-court-holds-news-website-liable-for-readers-comments.html

    I would imagine this holds for forum comments as well. Past history on this forum would suggest that anything that may be misconstrued from a legal point of view should be removed.

    in reply to: General Discussion #258739
    Derekf
    Participant

    Definitely a personal view since I cannot remember the last time I watched anything on ITV; possibly the odd nostalgia prog on ITV3 (or whatever its called) but there has been nothing for several years that has made me feel the need to watch or record it. Actually, Channel 4 has gone downhill too.

    That’s certainly our experience. My wife watches Coronation Street and that’s about the only ITV programme in our planner these days. A large proportion of our viewing is time-shifted on the “tyrannical” Sky channels but the rest is divided between the BBC channels and C4. Among the usual whining about the BBC, it still produces some of the finest broadcasting in the world, you only have to go back to look at their Olympic coverage to see that. The BBC isn’t perfect, what large corporation is.
    Oh and if you are still sitting through adverts while watching Sky channels then you’re doing it wrong and need to ask someone how to use the On-demand service or the pause function 🙂

    in reply to: The BBC – another damning report! #1859693
    Derekf
    Participant

    Definitely a personal view since I cannot remember the last time I watched anything on ITV; possibly the odd nostalgia prog on ITV3 (or whatever its called) but there has been nothing for several years that has made me feel the need to watch or record it. Actually, Channel 4 has gone downhill too.

    That’s certainly our experience. My wife watches Coronation Street and that’s about the only ITV programme in our planner these days. A large proportion of our viewing is time-shifted on the “tyrannical” Sky channels but the rest is divided between the BBC channels and C4. Among the usual whining about the BBC, it still produces some of the finest broadcasting in the world, you only have to go back to look at their Olympic coverage to see that. The BBC isn’t perfect, what large corporation is.
    Oh and if you are still sitting through adverts while watching Sky channels then you’re doing it wrong and need to ask someone how to use the On-demand service or the pause function 🙂

    in reply to: General Discussion #258986
    Derekf
    Participant

    Df is defending the bbc hard so that proves they are left wing ; )
    Edit …also i see Ed Millipede is doing ok on the expenses ; )

    Rather blindly following one dogma or another, I think it’s more important to try get at the facts in any debate. Something others might do well to try sometime. Interesting that none of the points I’ve made have been challenged or discussed.

    There was me thinking that it was a discussion forum as well.

    Once again, my work here is done…….

    in reply to: The BBC – another damning report! #1859931
    Derekf
    Participant

    Df is defending the bbc hard so that proves they are left wing ; )
    Edit …also i see Ed Millipede is doing ok on the expenses ; )

    Rather blindly following one dogma or another, I think it’s more important to try get at the facts in any debate. Something others might do well to try sometime. Interesting that none of the points I’ve made have been challenged or discussed.

    There was me thinking that it was a discussion forum as well.

    Once again, my work here is done…….

    in reply to: General Discussion #258999
    Derekf
    Participant

    The “Damning report” that the OP entitled the thread is actually quite far from the truth. The BBC were commended for controlling the relocation on time and on budget but as I said, the rest of the press and the usual anti-BBC brigade ignored that section and instead concentrated on a handful of excessive payments.

    Keeping up with Jones = competitive

    in reply to: The BBC – another damning report! #1859939
    Derekf
    Participant

    The “Damning report” that the OP entitled the thread is actually quite far from the truth. The BBC were commended for controlling the relocation on time and on budget but as I said, the rest of the press and the usual anti-BBC brigade ignored that section and instead concentrated on a handful of excessive payments.

    Keeping up with Jones = competitive

    in reply to: General Discussion #259050
    Derekf
    Participant

    Meanwhile, away from the hysteria,

    From the Guardian in May 2013.

    The majority of Salford relocation packages – 458 out of 854 in total – were £10,000 or less. However, 188 BBC staff received £50,000 or more and 11 between £100,000 and £150,000.

    Another quote from the same article which, no doubt, will be ignored.

    Overall, the NAO said that the corporation had done a good job in controlling the cost of establishing its new BBC North broadcasting and production base in Salford

    in reply to: The BBC – another damning report! #1859973
    Derekf
    Participant

    Meanwhile, away from the hysteria,

    From the Guardian in May 2013.

    The majority of Salford relocation packages – 458 out of 854 in total – were £10,000 or less. However, 188 BBC staff received £50,000 or more and 11 between £100,000 and £150,000.

    Another quote from the same article which, no doubt, will be ignored.

    Overall, the NAO said that the corporation had done a good job in controlling the cost of establishing its new BBC North broadcasting and production base in Salford

    in reply to: General Discussion #259107
    Derekf
    Participant

    I am not anti BBC or any other corporation, I was just pointing out that you offer redundancy or the option to move.
    I am sure in a few years time there will be frontpage headlines similar to the MPs expenses row. Just remember it all comes back to us the paying public for any of these events.

    That’s what I said. The BBC will probably have offered redundancy for those that don’t want to move or a relocation package for those that do. Is that a problem? If the company want you to move then the company should pay for it.

    in reply to: The BBC – another damning report! #1860035
    Derekf
    Participant

    I am not anti BBC or any other corporation, I was just pointing out that you offer redundancy or the option to move.
    I am sure in a few years time there will be frontpage headlines similar to the MPs expenses row. Just remember it all comes back to us the paying public for any of these events.

    That’s what I said. The BBC will probably have offered redundancy for those that don’t want to move or a relocation package for those that do. Is that a problem? If the company want you to move then the company should pay for it.

    in reply to: General Discussion #259214
    Derekf
    Participant

    it should of been redundancies but if you wish to move fine, god almighty what is it coming to. In my day if you could not get to the workplace then you did not get the work.

    in the 80s if I worked away from home my allowance was £12.00 and told because I am working away I will be working longer so earning more ! I refused and got a job close to home.
    so in fact the reason to go to Manchester to save money has cost money.

    BBC or not it does seem a bit extravagant

    If the company you work for relocates your work then that company has to pay for you to move. Either that or it offers you redundancy. Most companies will try and retain as many of its workers as possible as it saves on retraining and disruption to productivity.
    On a relocation, all of the removal costs, estate agents fees, solicitors fees etc, are normally paid by the company. And rightly so.

    Was the move worth it? It is too soon to tell. Ask in another 5 years.

    I appreciate that this may go against the normal anti-BBC rants we normally see but there you have it.

Viewing 15 posts - 601 through 615 (of 1,281 total)