Yeah, youngsters these days even refuse to engage in pederasty.
Eh??
I think I’ve had enough of this place. Most threads seem to degenerate into nonsense these days.
Yeah, youngsters these days even refuse to engage in pederasty.
Eh??
I think I’ve had enough of this place. Most threads seem to degenerate into nonsense these days.
Meanwhile back at the thread……
I wouldn’t mind betting that every generation has complained about declining moral standards in the younger generation. I believe Andrew Marr mentioned that very problem with reference to the ancient Greece.
Meanwhile back at the thread……
I wouldn’t mind betting that every generation has complained about declining moral standards in the younger generation. I believe Andrew Marr mentioned that very problem with reference to the ancient Greece.
I’ll be amazed if they aren’t getting child benefit or family tax credits. Nothing commendable about having that many children.
I’ll be amazed if they aren’t getting child benefit or family tax credits. Nothing commendable about having that many children.
Afghanistan? Blair’s war?
How easily we forget. I know it was 11 years ago but this is why we went into Afghanistan.
Afghanistan? Blair’s war?
How easily we forget. I know it was 11 years ago but this is why we went into Afghanistan.
I have to say charliehunt that you have me baffled. I have looked back at the thread and have answered the vast majority of your points in a polite manner and I have engaged each point in a debating type manner. Which is more than you have. You have answered almost none of the points I made.
I would suggest if you are looking at someone to accuse of not debating the points, you need to look rather closer to home.
I know I will now have ability to read and understand called into question as is normal.
That’s not a debate – it’s a waste of time.
Well quite.
I change channel.
Get’s my vote these days.
I have to say charliehunt that you have me baffled. I have looked back at the thread and have answered the vast majority of your points in a polite manner and I have engaged each point in a debating type manner. Which is more than you have. You have answered almost none of the points I made.
I would suggest if you are looking at someone to accuse of not debating the points, you need to look rather closer to home.
I know I will now have ability to read and understand called into question as is normal.
That’s not a debate – it’s a waste of time.
Well quite.
I change channel.
Get’s my vote these days.
To be unimpressed by 90 visits in an attempt to solve the world’s longest running conflict says more about you than it says about Tony Blair. He hasn’t been completely successful but then again he hasn’t given up either – like some would do.
Perhaps my understanding of the conflict isn’t complete (who’s is?) but at least I am willing to support those trying to help as opposed to those simply sneer from the sidelines.
I ask again. What justification can there be for this?
How anyone can say that this sort of thing will help towards a peaceful conclusion is beyond me, and I suspect most people.
To be unimpressed by 90 visits in an attempt to solve the world’s longest running conflict says more about you than it says about Tony Blair. He hasn’t been completely successful but then again he hasn’t given up either – like some would do.
Perhaps my understanding of the conflict isn’t complete (who’s is?) but at least I am willing to support those trying to help as opposed to those simply sneer from the sidelines.
I ask again. What justification can there be for this?
How anyone can say that this sort of thing will help towards a peaceful conclusion is beyond me, and I suspect most people.
Laughable, but perhaps not surprising. You were the one the brought up Iran in the first place. Hamas’ relationship to Iran is irrelevant in Israel’s escalation of the the crisis.
I notice you failed to answer your very own point about Tony Blair – again not surprising.
If my question was so childish and at a primary school level, it shouldn’t be too difficult to answer then should it.
The answer is still b) by the way.
Laughable, but perhaps not surprising. You were the one the brought up Iran in the first place. Hamas’ relationship to Iran is irrelevant in Israel’s escalation of the the crisis.
I notice you failed to answer your very own point about Tony Blair – again not surprising.
If my question was so childish and at a primary school level, it shouldn’t be too difficult to answer then should it.
The answer is still b) by the way.
Well, I suppose if you just want to give up then fair enough.
Tony Blair has made 90 visits to the region since he started in his role as a peace envoy in fact I believe he returned there yesterday. I don’t expect a Tory would acknowledge that though. You would rather make snide comments about other trips.
So to answer my point, do you think the Israeli assassination of a Hamas official has a)helped the situation and made a peaceful solution more likely or b) made it worse and made a peaceful solution less likely?
a) or b)?
Hint: it’s b)