dark light

Malcolm McKay

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,156 through 1,170 (of 1,462 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Did I imagine it?? #1315248
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant
    in reply to: XH558….Today was the day #1317169
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    Wonderful

    in reply to: Can anybody tell me what the planes are? #1329780
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    I think it is the XLB-3A with twin P&W R-1340-1 engines.

    in reply to: By the way, have you seen this P40…? #1243912
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    That one was from a US based training squadron – the markings are really great. However the real thing, of which colour photos exist, was a really grimy mess.

    in reply to: Of legends rumours and urban myths #1250774
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    Thanks for that.They are a great find.Going off topic there are some German Stug tanks sitting in defence on the Romanian boarder if anyones interested.Just gotto find the website again..

    In defence ? Perhaps you mean in the fence ? 😀

    in reply to: Should crash sites be disturbed?? #1250783
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    Careful Tim….you’ll go upsetting those sarkyologists again!

    Well !!! If you are going to be like that I won’t tell you about the latest sightings at the Stork Hotel 😀

    in reply to: Swivel mounted strafing guns? #1251165
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    With the B-25/PBY/ect forward firing strafers, were there ever any attempts or tactics for using the side or ventral guns for offensive use? Or were they reserved for defensive use only?

    It seems that with some kind of paired .50 mount in those huge side blisters, the Cat could have made a pretty good orbiting strafer :confused:

    Matt

    AFAIK no, and the poor old Cat would have made a bit of a big slow orbiting target. They weren’t all that agile.

    The gunship concept in Vietnam for instance really only worked in areas free of large amounts of serious AA. In the Pacific in WW2 for instance the Japanese did manage to field quite a lot of AA

    in reply to: Point Cook to remain an operational RAAF "Heritage" Base #1255899
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    FYI

    “Defence is taking steps to ensure that RAAF Williams Point Cook is a safe environment in which the Australian Defence Force, licensed stakeholders and the general community can coexist, while also maintaining the estate and the environment in a manner which improves the many heritage values of the site.”

    That’s good news but why, oh why, has every government announcement in this country got to have one of those mother hen clauses? Are we really so concerned about risk or just going through the motions so as not frighten the less mature and the kiddies. Rant off 😀 .

    I am glad that Pt Cook is being saved – the thought of it being relaced by a heritage free housing estate was pretty grim.

    in reply to: Sydney Camm #1261556
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    Certainly Camm was a brilliant designer.

    But I offer a thought regarding Mitchell and Supermarine. None of the successor designs to the Spitfire were as good. Granted that the Attacker was really in the experimental period of jet design but the later designs from Vickers/Supermarine were not world beaters.

    Now does that mean that if Mitchell had lived there would have been better designs produced or does it mean that the Spitfire was that rarity a one off piece of serendipity? It is hard to say because Joe Smith was no slouch and it was he who oversaw the Spitfire’s constant metamorphosis.

    Also if we look at Mitchell’s designs prior to the Spitfire, they were either large competent flying boats or one-off no hold’s barred racers. The gull-winged monoplane fighter he designed was not successful or even capable of meeting the spec.

    But as Mitchell did not live it is impossible to forecast the result. Camm however most certainly has the runs on the board.

    in reply to: Inter-war images from India – info please #1264318
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    The first Brisfit would, I suspect, be a 20 Squadron aircraft which (obviously) did serve in India. I think the other is a 5 Squadron aircraft. The Fokker may actually be an Avro licence built version.

    But I am no expert here.

    in reply to: Fleet Air Arm Photos on flickr… #1275224
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    I’ll stop posting these soon but there are lots of good, unidentified photosets people have found or inherited. This photoset has photographs of Seafires, Avengers, Hellcats and Walrus, as well as combat photos and misc types.

    Is this an early or late mark Barracuda (I think late?)

    http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=369268480&context=set-72157594500098423&size=l

    Late

    in reply to: Bader downed – The book of the film. #1279773
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    Good luck with book Andy – I’m looking forward to it.

    🙂

    in reply to: Help! with This medal WW2 #1287379
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    Not Aviation related but can you help!

    Can you point me in the right Direction?
    What is this Medal, why was it awarded and is there a way of finding out the recipient of the medal
    In the second picture the numbers 128 are to be seen stamped into the ring attached to the medal will this help.
    Thanks Again

    If the loop has a number on it this site http://www.wehrmacht-awards.com/iron_cross/ironcrossmain.htm may tell you who made it.

    in reply to: Concorde #1287384
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    (sorry, but JFK is still dead, Armstrong did walk on the real moon, HRH QE did not kill Diana, Bush did not plan 9/11, etc.)

    He is? He did? She didn’t? He didn’t? Oh noooooo the voices were wrong !!!! Where’s my tin foil helmet ?

    😮

    in reply to: "Haunted piece of aircraft wreckage" #1304174
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    I have it on the best authority that that piece was seen in the Bleaklow Arms in 1942.

    😀

Viewing 15 posts - 1,156 through 1,170 (of 1,462 total)