Not sure what the plans are with regards to the A346 and JNB. I also can’t tell you anything about range as all I know is that it does everything they need to do as is. Virgin consider it to be the best package currently available to suit their own individual operation.
The stand originally had the aircraft at about 30 degrees nose up! I bent it down to make it considerably more realistic!!!
Absolutely. I am exceedingly lucky to have returned at the beginning of a recruitment drive that is supposed to see a doubling of the company size by 2010. When command eventually comes I would like it to not contain a type change at the same time.
Ian,
some of our many reasons for the B744 was Days off, excellent destinations, lifestyle, golf courses down route to name but a few………not cargo capacity…..HEEEEEEEEE 😀 😀 😀 😀 😀 only kidding mate.
This is actually quite an interesting point as it shows how 2 companies (Cathay and Virgin) use the same aircraft in such different ways. If you were a 744 pilot in Virgin you would be doing the inferior trips with LESS days off and more bullets! The 744 is becoming Virgins ‘charter’ type aircraft. If it’s lifestyle you’re after (which I am) as a Virgin pilot you need to avoid the 744. It looks probable to me that the 744’s may well end up entirely at LGW and MAN. As I live so close to LHR that’s where I want to be based.
In the 90’s Aer lingus could operate their A330’s with hold cargo alone and still make a profit. Virgin can do the same with the A340-600. This means that the expanding fleet to be on in VS is the one that is less concerned about wavering passenger numbers. SARS, terrorism, etc…….cargo in the hold doesn’t stop flying like passngers do.
The best thing that ever happened to Boeing was Airbus’s appearance in the 80’s. Now the best thing that has happened to Airbus is Boeing’s resurgence in the early 2000’s.
Well I’m biased, Victor, but I particularly enjoyed the second and third one!
Sorry if I misled guys but this was exactly what I was alluding to. Originally the plan had hinted 28 777-300ER’s but after the initial teething problems were sorted Virgin are delighted with the A340-600. For example, during the SARS crisis Virgin were able to operate the A346 to HKG with much more freight than a 744 can carry which in itself was enough to make the route profitable. Any passengers carried were purely a bonus. This would not have been the case with a 744. This was one of the many reasons why I was so keen to get on the bus.
Airbus are quite rightly nervous of this product as there is an awful lot of development work to be done to make the A330 competitive against it. I hope they achieve it as it will give us as pilots a better end product regardless of which manufacturers type you fly.
Worryingly ambitious!
I wouldn’t be surprised if MyTravel sold holidays from NCL but sent them on TCX or BY. There are a lot of agreements between the charters to save sticking airframes where the market is largely saturated already.
Bet it makes an awesome sound! Designed by committee, flown by a committee as well!
The rubber tip is a no go item if it is missing IIRC! If ice builds up on the tip of the spinner the rubber vibrates due to the imbalance and throws the ice off before it gets too big.
I may be wrong but I think RR always have pointy spinners. Can anyone confirm?
The press will always refer to any landing at anywhere other than the destination as an emergency landing whereas most are in reality just precautionary landings. While the decompression itself would bean emergency procedure both landings I would class as precautionary.
Sometimes circumstances just happen to contrive against you. The 767 has proven to be a great workhorse for so many airlines for so long. I would guess that any concentration of incidents at the moment is purely circumstantial.