In answer to 3) the interest in salacious gossip and stories of the famous and their infidelities is as old as the hills. The internet in all its guises has just enabled information to be instantly peddled to those who are keen to gobble it up.

As I said in the other thread, if you “play away” you accept the risks in being found out.

christine keeler comes to mind !!

my feelings are there is no privacy if you court stardom and wish to be in the public eye and if they are scared of people talking they should keep it ” tucked up inside thier pants !!”

this woman was clearly after nothing else but a good bank ballance and those on twitter were retarded enough to give it her

now it is out her side of the story will be worth even more

giggs should have turned round said ” yeah it was me , and you make a lousey breakfast , move on babe !”

he’d get more respect , she’d get less money , and he’d probably stand more chance of keeping his marriage instead of being a spineless irresponsible weasel !!

Ok, so its finally ended…and the winning bid…£81,100.01…some people clearly have more money than sense!

Can’t be too harsh on the buyer though I suppose because at the end of the day the money raised is going to decent charities, but seriously lets hope that whoever has bought it isnt seen wearing it in public!

why is it often said ” more money than sense ” ???

just suppose it is a celebrity etc like simon cowel for instance

i believe if the money is ” gift aided ” for charrity it is tax free

and a nice way to loose money without it being taxable

and not forgetting £ 100,000 is bog roll money to the likes of that level of celebrity

you can guarantee whoever has it they won’t even notice when the money goes out of the account

to make that much money that you don’t worry about spending £100,000 on a hat to help needy kids and loose taxable income you have to have ” more sense than money !! “

Exploding camel dung…..it doesn’t get much dirtier than that! :diablo:

the original ” dirty bomb !”

Forgive me but from the pictures published here it looks like decorative headwear. Are you suggesting that Mrs SH is wrong??!!!:diablo:

nope !! i was agreeing it is a fascinator !!

No, it wasn’t. I have it on good authority – none other than Mrs SH herself – that it was a “fascinator”!! Yes, I know……..don’t ask!:confused:

a fascinator is decorative headwear a hat is …. well a hat and has purpose other than decorative !!

but the last i heard it had made £18,000.00 for dissadvantaged kids

well done !! and thanks !! should be the order !! irrespective of her position or if she is liked or not !!

Come on……admit it….it’s hideous isn’t it !! 😀

to be shure !! 😀 but no more so than a lot of the fashion worn by the younger generation

but having said that from my generation flares and platform heels one wrapped around the legs whilst walking causing trips , the other made balancing perilous

then some genious married the ideas up !!:eek: