dark light

TomcatViP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 5,581 through 5,595 (of 5,621 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-104G vs Mirage-IIIE Comparison #2239769
    TomcatViP
    Participant
    in reply to: F-104G vs Mirage-IIIE Comparison #2239785
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    It was extremely fast for it’s time.

    It was the first mach 2 fighter in service.

    Pilot account (incude 4Vs6 (another Delta)):
    http://users.bestweb.net/~kcoyne/f104story.htm

    in reply to: F-104G vs Mirage-IIIE Comparison #2239795
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    @WilHelm: yes. That’s why there is smthing commune to the 104 and the 22. WWII use to call hit B&Z, hit and run in 50/60’s, now, in the teens years it might it be Sneak&Boom (or sneak&run), what leads me to set some nove-langue here: Sneak&Broom 😉 ?

    in reply to: F-104G vs Mirage-IIIE Comparison #2239890
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    the term “buffeting” is ill-chosen in tht case. More sensitive to wind gust is what they shld hve say.

    As wing area increase, variation of total lift is less damped by the weight of the airplane. Also, bigger wing means increased wet surface that means more time to regain the speed lost in wind gust.

    Hence, basically your plane oscillate more in the vertical and horizontal plans as the wing is bigger for a given thrust and weight.

    in reply to: how could North Korea use its air power in an attack? #2239908
    TomcatViP
    Participant
    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #15 #2239993
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Hi!
    I found some pictures of the Malaysian A.F.
    http://forums.airshows.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=21003
    All the best!
    Alex

    Great shot of a Ca-27 (Avon Sabre with 30mm Aden Canon)

    They were said to be the higher flying Sabre

    in reply to: F-104G vs Mirage-IIIE Comparison #2240107
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    One Cheetah D twin seater was converted with the SMR-95 (modified RD-33), and a single seater Mirage F1AZ was also converted.

    Apparently, the Cheetah showed the most gains equipped with the engine, with the Mirage F1AZ showing a lesser performance gain.

    Thx !

    in reply to: Taranis to be tested in Australia #2240110
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    what are they developing?
    actually, i’m not certain, but i was reading about BAE’s development of GPS-independent (i.e. with jamming or dead satellites) navigation methods that using the video system extrapolated the location of all objects/features in field of view, compared to known location at beginning of flight and other objects simultaneously in field of view, and constantly derives the aircraft’s own location from all of this. i don’t really know if that is specific to taranis though, as opposed to mantis which has also been tested in AU.

    It’s an “old” navigational mode developed ard the Raf requirements: to be able to penetrate hostile airspace at low alt (50ft) in a totally passive mode (no GPS, no TFR, no radar alimeter – only image comparison).

    I thought this had been integrated ijn the Scalp/Apache but I might be wrong

    in reply to: F-104G vs Mirage-IIIE Comparison #2240310
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    In only mem, only one was made. Do I am right ?

    in reply to: F-104G vs Mirage-IIIE Comparison #2240326
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Maybe someone should start an F-4 and Draken thread, seeing as how this is a Mirage III and F-104 thread.

    At least the Drak (a superb aeroplane by the way) won’t hve out accelerated the Mirage.

    However High alpha +better roll rate-> Ok, the Drak had the upper hand on this

    in reply to: Chinese Su-34 FULLBACK Copy? #2240327
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    different design same mission
    it is like f16 and f18

    Perhaps but one looks like a failure and the other is a success.

    And don’t take me wrong, I am not saying that, as it is Chinese it as to be a failure.

    in reply to: Tools of a Chinese Way of War #2240331
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    hve you read the sources of that wiki art ? That does not look trustworthy

    in reply to: Pak-Fa News Thread part 22 #2240765
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Once the core architecture is set and validated with lifetime observation, a high performances turbofan can be declined in various eng for the industries.

    The number of stages in LPC/HPC and turbines is also a direct indication of the eng efficiency.

    in reply to: F-104G vs Mirage-IIIE Comparison #2241091
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    IIIVs104 is really an interesting debate. It’s a mock up of the supersonic dogfights of tommorrow. There shld be a thread dedicated to this.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 12 #2241122
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    😀

    [JokeMode=ON]
    I’m sry but an advanced Mig31 derivative is what ppl call an YF12 in the west
    [JokeMode=OFF]

Viewing 15 posts - 5,581 through 5,595 (of 5,621 total)