It was extremely fast for it’s time.
It was the first mach 2 fighter in service.
Pilot account (incude 4Vs6 (another Delta)):
http://users.bestweb.net/~kcoyne/f104story.htm
@WilHelm: yes. That’s why there is smthing commune to the 104 and the 22. WWII use to call hit B&Z, hit and run in 50/60’s, now, in the teens years it might it be Sneak&Boom (or sneak&run), what leads me to set some nove-langue here: Sneak&Broom 😉 ?
the term “buffeting” is ill-chosen in tht case. More sensitive to wind gust is what they shld hve say.
As wing area increase, variation of total lift is less damped by the weight of the airplane. Also, bigger wing means increased wet surface that means more time to regain the speed lost in wind gust.
Hence, basically your plane oscillate more in the vertical and horizontal plans as the wing is bigger for a given thrust and weight.
The Roadman defense
http://theweek.com/section/nfcartoon/242701/the-rodman-defense
Hi!
I found some pictures of the Malaysian A.F.
http://forums.airshows.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=21003
All the best!
Alex
Great shot of a Ca-27 (Avon Sabre with 30mm Aden Canon)
They were said to be the higher flying Sabre
One Cheetah D twin seater was converted with the SMR-95 (modified RD-33), and a single seater Mirage F1AZ was also converted.
Apparently, the Cheetah showed the most gains equipped with the engine, with the Mirage F1AZ showing a lesser performance gain.
Thx !
what are they developing?
actually, i’m not certain, but i was reading about BAE’s development of GPS-independent (i.e. with jamming or dead satellites) navigation methods that using the video system extrapolated the location of all objects/features in field of view, compared to known location at beginning of flight and other objects simultaneously in field of view, and constantly derives the aircraft’s own location from all of this. i don’t really know if that is specific to taranis though, as opposed to mantis which has also been tested in AU.
It’s an “old” navigational mode developed ard the Raf requirements: to be able to penetrate hostile airspace at low alt (50ft) in a totally passive mode (no GPS, no TFR, no radar alimeter – only image comparison).
I thought this had been integrated ijn the Scalp/Apache but I might be wrong
In only mem, only one was made. Do I am right ?
Maybe someone should start an F-4 and Draken thread, seeing as how this is a Mirage III and F-104 thread.
At least the Drak (a superb aeroplane by the way) won’t hve out accelerated the Mirage.
However High alpha +better roll rate-> Ok, the Drak had the upper hand on this
different design same mission
it is like f16 and f18
Perhaps but one looks like a failure and the other is a success.
And don’t take me wrong, I am not saying that, as it is Chinese it as to be a failure.
hve you read the sources of that wiki art ? That does not look trustworthy
Once the core architecture is set and validated with lifetime observation, a high performances turbofan can be declined in various eng for the industries.
The number of stages in LPC/HPC and turbines is also a direct indication of the eng efficiency.
IIIVs104 is really an interesting debate. It’s a mock up of the supersonic dogfights of tommorrow. There shld be a thread dedicated to this.
😀
[JokeMode=ON]
I’m sry but an advanced Mig31 derivative is what ppl call an YF12 in the west
[JokeMode=OFF]