dark light

Beermat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 3,326 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: John Young, Aviation Artist #814371
    Beermat
    Participant

    John Young could make you smell and hear the aeroplanes he painted. R.I.P.

    in reply to: Removed thread #814376
    Beermat
    Participant

    Whoever did it could have locked it instead..

    in reply to: Removed thread #814381
    Beermat
    Participant

    Ah, ok. Scotavia, of course I wasn’t suggesting anyone wrote “You can’t say (insert disallowed phrase here) on a forum and that’s why we pulled it”. Maybe ‘Precise reasons’ isn’t quite what I meant. I was really just thinking about guidance for the future about how not to libel, or be offensive, or whatever it was, or even which of the rules were broken. There was a good conversation about a deeply serious topic in the midst of some questionable commentary in there, and it was a shame to lose it.

    in reply to: On Your Marks.. AIR81 Casualty Packs #816105
    Beermat
    Participant

    geburke3, PM sent.

    in reply to: On Your Marks.. AIR81 Casualty Packs #816330
    Beermat
    Participant

    Hi Gerry

    HH Kitchener was the third pilot in the flight of three, He survived the incident which occurred in cloud and reported it at the time as happening ‘near Bovey Tracey’. He wasn’t navigating the flight, and depending upon one’s definition of ‘near’ was inaccurate. The other two aircraft impacted somewhere else, and I am sorry if I am being cagey. It wasn’t Foxtor Mire, though, that is rapidly becoming a Dartmoor legend but it’s a little off.

    I would be very happy indeed to hear any more on this. I know that Kitchener was interviewed shortly before he died and I have heard his account of the accident second hand – do you have the transcript? Just to give context, I have been researching this for seven years, including visits to Dartmoor, talking to witnesses and unearthing diaries that record the wreckage. I have a pretty good idea of the location (within about 2 square KM) and have even field walked the area, with other WFP folk. Nothing yet.

    in reply to: On Your Marks.. AIR81 Casualty Packs #816438
    Beermat
    Participant

    Sometimes they can be great, other times devoid of information. The two Whirlwinds? Nothing. They just say ‘Dartmoor’. We kind of knew that. Has anyone done the ‘Spitfire in a tree’ yet?

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay 2019 #816610
    Beermat
    Participant

    Regarding that spinner:

    [ATTACH=JSON]{“alt”:”Click image for larger version Name:tSpinner.png Views:t0 Size:t355.9 KB ID:t3853622″,”data-align”:”none”,”data-attachmentid”:”3853622″,”data-size”:”full”,”title”:”Spinner.png”}[/ATTACH]

    _t does appear to be of the German-designed VDM (Vereinigte Deutsche Metalwerke) type – i.e. a spun dome ‘cap’ with a hole where the spindle attached for manufacture and a sheet rear section, riveted at a join which also attached via a reinforcing ring to the prop boss (although this whole ring is curiously missing here). However, this was widely used under licence by propeller manufacturers around the world, including the Russians, Americans and both de Havilland and Rotol at different times via British subcontractors, largest of whom was cheeky enough to call themselves VDM spinners Ltd, and imply they owned the patent:

    This particular spinner does not share the profile of any 109 model I have found – G and E types below:

    Note the ‘E’ type is one-piece, not of the VDM patented type at all, with no join or rivet line. The ‘G’ type did have a reinforcing ring and a riveted join, but looked completely different in profile.

    If anything, this looks most like a – potentially more interesting – TA-152 spinner:
    [ATTACH=JSON]{“alt”:”Click image for larger version Name:t152.png Views:t0 Size:t161.6 KB ID:t3853620″,”data-align”:”none”,”data-attachmentid”:”3853620″,”data-size”:”full”,”title”:”152.png”}[/ATTACH]
    ..or even, though the odds against must surely be enormous, one of these:

    http://www.geocities.ws/lastdingo/aviation/he100-14.jpg

    But on balance no, not 109. It could be from any number of things, not even necessarily German, and one of the least likely candidates is 109.

    in reply to: Never mind how low what about close can you go……. #818601
    Beermat
    Participant

    That’s a classic example of people thinking they are being very clever when in fact they are being stupid. It may be officially sanctioned stupid, but it’s still stupid. It does raise the interesting question about who, if anyone, is to blame when it goes wrong. Is there such a thing as ‘institutionalised negligence’?

    I would tell myself to lighten up if it wasn’t for another thread raising the accident rate among that team – the job has a 10 percent fatality rate. Reading the causes it would appear that a high proportion of fatalities were from testosterone overdose.

    in reply to: 1937/38 aircraft ID #820491
    Beermat
    Participant

    Thanks all! That’s great.

    Matt

    in reply to: Site issues #821518
    Beermat
    Participant

    Working again for me too. Thank you to the web-elves who fixed it.

    in reply to: Tim Elkington RIP #821723
    Beermat
    Participant

    Farewell and Blue Skies, Tim. A very sad day – many of us on this forum will have had contact with this gentleman – and I use the word very deliberately – and will be deeply saddened by this news. My thoughts are with Mr. Elkington’s family and friends.

    in reply to: Amelia Earharts Electra found. No, not by you know who… #822220
    Beermat
    Participant

    Yes, I expect you’re right, Consul. But you surely get my point, it’s no more a ‘mystery’ than any other lost aircraft, it’s just an echo of celebrity – sufficient to make money for some people. For me the interest is more ‘what’s that thing they have found’ that ‘where exactly did an Electra fall into the Pacific’, even though it would be an even more interesting answer if it were that thing. Particularly as it would be fun to see the reaction of Tighar-donors.

    I have just held my nose and read the Daily Mail article, and wished hadn’t – it actually quotes Gillespie, who talks of the various people, mostly housewives, in the US who claimed to have received signals from the 300-mile range HF set on board on their domestic radios. My favourite part is the ‘artists impression’ of an Electra standing on its undercarriage having landed on a submerged coral reef. I am starting to wonder whether the same ‘artist’ did the pristine panel under the coral.

    Digging into the issue of the range of the sets on board, the internet seems full of Gillespie, with sites like the ‘Tech Times’ talking of the Electra ‘disappearing from radars’ (quite a trick mid-Pacific in 1937) and how all the reported transmissions (High level harmonics ‘heard’ by housewives in Florida and Texas when they ‘just happened to turn their sets on at the right time’) had been somehow ‘traced’ to Gardner Island.

    The Mail had to resort to this kind of hokum actually put out by a different theorist to fill up this new story (minus the ‘traced back to Gardner’, of course). All we really have is a blobby coral formation that’s the wreck of something. By the project’s own admission it’s a debris trail, so measuring it won’t help much. And a dish that could be part of a landing light. Or a dinner service. That no attempt has been apparently yet been made (at least publicly) to compare it to an actual Electra landing light makes me doubtful.

    If anyone from Blue Angel is reading this, here’s a useful link:
    https://www.letadlanaplatne.cz/en/fi…-l-10-electra/

    ..they have one with the original 10E lights. There may even be one or two closer to home. Yes, I am being a tad ironic and cynical, it’s a British thing.

    in reply to: Amelia Earharts Electra found. No, not by you know who… #822313
    Beermat
    Participant

    Don’t get me wrong, In trying to understand what the unusual thing I am looking at here actually is does not mean I am excited about it being that particular aeroplane. In fact I have never understood why it has obsessed so many people more than any other aviation accident.. They messed up, many people have. I am interested to find out what those divers actually found – it’s an intriguing image.

    in reply to: Amelia Earharts Electra found. No, not by you know who… #822378
    Beermat
    Participant

    Hi all – I can’t find the cockpit photograph, where is it?

    in reply to: Hawker Hurricane L1700 Crashed near Saul Gloucestershire #823234
    Beermat
    Participant

    Ant, I had forgotten that! Yes – because the ground was so soft I recall all the remains were in the ‘right’ place relative to each other. Certainly several Brownings came out. I also recall a lot of instrumentation and things from the cockpit area, and I have a vague memory of a control surface. I guess the main spar would have been in there too, if the guns were in place. The preservation was superb, with that anoxic black soil keeping fabric and webbing completely ‘as new’.

    At the time the SAS was drowning in Spitfire and Hurricane remains, having visited several sites related to the fighter OTU’s at Aston Down (the attrition rate was very high in 1940-42), and so we might have been a bit blase about where things ended up (looked at with hindsight).

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 3,326 total)