Your figures (273 nmi when flying at 50,000 and 122 nmiles at 10,000 ft) are correct, but for a low flying target! But if the target(s) are also flying high, there is a very different situation:
-both at 50,000 ft: radar horizon is 549 nmi!
-both flting at 10,000 ft: radar horizon: 367 nmi!
Only for a flat topography.
UHF is dampened by water vapor.
“Atmospheric moisture, the stream of particles from the sun called solar wind, and time of day will all have an effect on the signal transmission. All radio waves are partially absorbed by atmospheric moisture. Atmospheric absorption reduces, or attenuates, the strength of radio signals over long distances. The effects of attenuation increases according to the frequency. UHF signals are generally more degraded by moisture than lower bands such as VHF.”
Ever heard a VHF radar can fly?
No, that increase the empty weight.
Or not?
http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2007/11/airforce_raptor_rust_071112w/
The Raptor had a different problem with the aft boom. Engineers were worried the rear section of the jet, as designed, could not meet the 8,000-hour requirement, so they designed an aluminum reinforcement, called a “doubler.” That fix was added to the production line, but 41 jets were turned out before the production-line change.
Yes, i also do read AW, and Bill Sweetman, but you wont get a pin point accuracy at 250 NM with only one single RAPTOR and one single AN/ALR-94, there are physical limits to what you can detect and “pin point” at long ranges, the longer the range his the bigger the angular error gets, if you have several systems working at the same time that´s another story.
The key number in this his the “less than one degree” and not the range. The actual detection range of the DASS his several times bigger than the 100 km´s mentioned, but that will only give a broad “threat” direction of “X Degrees”.
The exact “stats” of the AN/ALR-94 are secret of course, but to have a real idea of the capabilities we would need to know the angular precision of those “250 NM”. Untill we have that kind of number a direct comparison with other systems his speculative, not that i do have any doubts that the AN/ALR-94 his a superb piece of equipment.Cheers 🙂
The limit ist the radio horizon!
Radio horizon in miles is the square root out (1.5 x height in feet) for VHF!
In 50000feet is the radio horizon 273 miles or 237nm away.
In 10000feet only 122 miles or 106 nm.
UHF and higher (1.23 x sqr height in feet) is the distance in miles.
50000ft is the radio horizon 247ml or 214nm away.
10000ft is the radio horizon 110ml or 95nm!
This is a physical law and no way to detect any thing beyond the horizon!
More important is a low wing aspect ratio.
Electronic countermeasure against low level –> The strawberry searcher P-15 „Flat Face A” Nato name squad eye!
CRS Report for Congress F-22 Raptor Order Code RL31673
Page 8 CRS-5 Figure 2.
Empty Weight 19,489 kg
Internal Fuel 8,323 kg
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/crs/crs_rl31673.pdf
Didn’t realise we were counting vapourware.
F-108 is single fin as is the Vigilante making them not the same layout as the twin finned Mig-25.
The Vigilante was projected with twin fin. 😉
I mean the EF.
Sure not the 1500er in the middle!
On the center pylon is only 1000l possible or you need a tapered tank.
Alenia has a 18000m^3 anechoic chamber.
The EADS anechoic chamber and the RCS antenna system.
Here is the orginal.
Is this with the old or with the new vertical tail?
Where is the echo for the outer pylons? 😉
James P. Stevenson page 70.
http://www.cdi.org/pdfs/stevenson%20f-22%20brief.pdf