http://www.airfleet.ru/index.php?staid=1001234 😉

http://eurofighter.airpower.at/fertigung-t-b-b.htm

Block 5 Software: PSP 4 (full multirole ability)
Funktionen: Night vision-Equipment for Striker-Datenhelm, Update FCS (A/G), full function Autopilot, PIRATE-IRST, full function ground collision-Warnsystem
Luft/Boden: GBU-10 Paveway II, GBU-16 Paveway II, Rafael Litening III, Kanone

Yahoo News
http://fr.news.yahoo.com/afp/20071207/tfr-defense-air-accident-f56f567_1.html

Somtimes is plasma reflectiv (ionosphere or Plasma Antennas).
The plasma itself emits EM radiation.
When your plasma is on then is your Radar useless and you are blind.
Plasma produce heat.
The Langmuir frequency —> the plasma is transparent and interact not with the Radar waves. Control of plasma properties is likely to be important for a functioning plasma stealth device, and it may be necessary to dynamically adjust the plasma density, temperature or composition, or the magnetic field, in order to effectively defeat different types of radar systems. Radars which can flexibly change their transmission frequency might be less susceptible to defeat by plasma stealth technology. A plasma might also be used to modify the reflected waves to confuse the opponent’s radar system: for example, phase shifting the reflected radiation would frustrate some old Doppler filter and might make the reflected radiation more difficult to distinguish from noise.
A real Doppler filter will not affected.
Plasma emit a glow, this is not necessarily compatible with overall low observability.

Like LO geometry and RAM materials, plasma stealth technology is probably not a panacea against radar.

But plasma antennas could be an alternative to AESA.
They can be electrically (magnetical) steerd without delay and switch on and off on demand.

Where on this chart is a Super Hornet, Rafale, and Typhoon when loaded with weapons?

:dev2: :diablo: 😀

Where is the F-35 flying? Which land use the F-35 in service now? The F-35 is currently the most expensive hangar Queen! This nonflying Preserie Prototyp F-35 is not compliant with the Serial Standard F-35. SU-35-1 and F-35 is not avaible yet. :dev2: :diablo: 😀

Ever heard of TACIT BLUE? It had straight wings and all-around LO… And of course the B-2A also has a much smaller sweep angle, so it must be a bigger RCS target than the EF-2000, right?

:rolleyes:

So TACIT BLUE has straigt wings? Realy not! :rolleyes:
Tacit Blue has a wing swepe and use CONONTINOUS CURVATURE. 😉
The B2 has also CONONTINOUS CURVATURE to, no Vertical Stabilizer and much RAM. rolleyes: The B2 need a air-conditioned hangar or rain damaged it’s RAM.;)

And this myth with the greater Typhoon tail. :diablo:

Who win the contest the F-35 or the F-32?
The F-32 can only hover at sealevel and arcieve supersonic only after manipulation on the intake. The F-32 was not able to start vertical and arcieve supersonic. 😉 Boeeing construct the X-32 with baffels.
When you insert baffel in a existing intake than choke you the airstream. You reduce the cross-sectional area. And Ups only the transonic area rule must we consider.

And why has this Rafale M no Sawtooth?