dark light

Nashio966

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,361 through 3,375 (of 3,400 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The Demise Of The TSR.2 (merged) #1301972
    Nashio966
    Participant

    making such a wonderful machine for financial gain is not what i had in mind, though maybe i could draw up a business plan that would allow for corporate sponsors? :diablo: entirely for my own pleasure ill have you all know! :p

    in reply to: The Demise Of The TSR.2 (merged) #1301984
    Nashio966
    Participant

    😮 totally forgot about that, well ive only used them as a vague outline :diablo: colourful though! 😀

    in reply to: The Demise Of The TSR.2 (merged) #1302015
    Nashio966
    Participant

    i feel wounded at his comments :p hehe, however damien, if you have any handy crayon drawings that you have recently done they would be really appreciated, though i have used the drawings from your website, pretty ace 🙂 i think bex may want you to add another section due to the rather subtle hint dropped 😀

    in reply to: The Demise Of The TSR.2 (merged) #1302426
    Nashio966
    Participant

    thankyou for your kind words, though hard as it may seem to believe i am not some numb minded moron who knows nothing of aircraft, i have a number of other drawings and three views of the TSR.2. also i have been to duxford and cosford museums on numerous occasions. going by these facts, might you understand that i do know what she looks like, and i appreciate the chap for posting that drawing as i welcome any additions to the drawing i already have :rolleyes:

    in reply to: The Demise Of The TSR.2 (merged) #1302438
    Nashio966
    Participant

    who cares, its useful as a guide, and at least the nice chap spent some time to post it!

    in reply to: The Demise Of The TSR.2 (merged) #1302441
    Nashio966
    Participant

    Beginnings of a dastardly plan?

    that sounds like a plan and a half! can you imagine the looks on the faces of the curators when one morning they arrive and 220 is on the ramp outside fully powered up and shaking the doors of the hangars with her exhaust! this has to be done! :diablo:

    in reply to: The Demise Of The TSR.2 (merged) #1302561
    Nashio966
    Participant

    well that was a nice positive start to a Saturday morning! im sure if you had read the entire thread, you would realise that its nothing but a pipe dream. im just making the point that it would be wonderful to see one fly, and its not impossible due to the airframe having zero flying hours! you could get one flying if you had about 50 million to spare for the restoration, bribing cosford, and the running costs, but the likelyhood of someone just saying “have 50 million pounds is rather slim” she would be cheaper to maintain that a vulcan anyway! :diablo:

    in reply to: The Demise Of The TSR.2 (merged) #1302569
    Nashio966
    Participant

    those will be very helpful, thankyou:)

    in reply to: The Demise Of The TSR.2 (merged) #1302782
    Nashio966
    Participant

    thats amazing! 😀 the story that i have heard is about don knight, my grandparents held a party near warton, (living in lancashire at the time) to which don knight was attending, with his copilot. my grandfather having missed the early train caught the later train from paddington, and just caught the evening news, “TSR.2, Cancelled!” or words to that effect. anyway when he arrived home and joined the party was amazed to find that neither don or his co-pilot knew a thing about the projects cancellation and were stunned to hear about it. as has been said before, WILSON HAS A LOT TO ANSWER FOR!!! :diablo:

    in reply to: The Demise Of The TSR.2 (merged) #1303892
    Nashio966
    Participant

    wow that seems like a brilliant idea, though i fear that there is no use for her now 🙁 a great pity considering that she must be unique in two respects, first being the only comlete TSR.2 (of two!) and that there cant be many aircraft in museums with no hours on the airframe whatsoever ! ! ! apparently her operational name was going to be the “Trenchard” odd name, but i think that that my have been just rumour 😀

    in reply to: The Demise Of The TSR.2 (merged) #1304364
    Nashio966
    Participant

    LARGE CASH INJECTION!

    Im sure if a charitable multimillionaire donated a nice round sum, cosford would be quite happy to let a team of experienced engineers sort her out! i very much doubt that she would ever be allowed to fly on the basis that the MoD May get jealous that a civvie owns an aircraft that can easily out manouver and out perform anything currently in service 😀 and still i believe that there would be massive contraversy politically with regard to her flying! still a blissfully wonderful dream to spend an afternoon thinking about 😀 soon have that mahoosive model on the go :diablo:

    in reply to: A sad picture of a VC-10 (1997) #1304412
    Nashio966
    Participant

    apparently, she had a problem with a fuel leak or something, so they fully fueled her and then after checking fuel systems, an engineer was tasked with the boring task of de-fueling her. the gauge that reads fuel levels in the rudder was faulty and told him that there was nothing in it when it was fully fueled. thus after having emptied the main tanks, her C of G went aft, (not helped by the refueling pods which already shift the C of G aft) and she settled onto her tail.

    something to that effect, im sure that there is an ex 10/101 sqn engineer who could fill us in on the finer details? 😀

    in reply to: The Demise Of The TSR.2 (merged) #1304416
    Nashio966
    Participant

    sorry about the deleted thing, i thought that id look like a plonker if i posted a reply twice, on consecutively on my own thread, lol. i do wonder though, neither the one at cosford or the one at duxford have ever flown, so there would be no problem with fatigue life would there? engines would be available in the worm of concorde’s olympus which i have been led to believe is basically the same engine, so with repair to the wiring and hydraulics, it wouldn’t be a lot easier that trying to get a victor or a vulcan back in the air i would have thought, the only problem would be a spares backup! and the fact that technically they are prototypes. yeah a 1/4 scale one would be pretty ace, about 8 and a half metres long! i found a couple of UAV turbojets producing 150lb static thrust each, that should do the job as it will have to weigh less than 80kg i think (LMA exemption or something like that) still would be pretty epic, and i suppose after i had had my fun i would donate her to a museum or something! they could ground run it HAHA 😀

    in reply to: A sad picture of a VC-10 (1997) #1304730
    Nashio966
    Participant

    she was at the far end of the main hangar wasn’t she next to the main road, was she really broken up in 1999? i remember going to the flying club at BZN only the other day and seeing her, how time flies. or was there another one that met the same fate, i remember seeing one in much the same way except in the gray colour that the VC-10’s are now painted, Im probably wrong mind 🙂

    in reply to: The Demise Of The TSR.2 (merged) #1304934
    Nashio966
    Participant

    Does anyone have any scale drawings/ three views of TSR2, seriously thinking about building a 1/4 scale jet powered model TSR2, thats probably going to be the closest thing we could get to a flying one 🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 3,361 through 3,375 (of 3,400 total)