dark light

Srbin

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 1,678 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Potential for the A-50/F-50 Golden Eagle? #2623050
    Srbin
    Participant

    Is UAE more democratic then the other arabic nations? It surely has enough cash to pay for these machines. But it seems to be bit strange that they suddenly have so many super high tech planes and almost none internal pilots. There was a row in the past about maybe UAE using foreign pilots. I know that in Turkey thay had only UAE pilots to get used to F16. But is UAE able to handle it internal? Do they have enough UAE engineers? Or is it like the KSA contract where pilots and enineers are hired from western nations?

    As it appears they do not have half the pilots they need to run these machines, I am not exactly sure about the maintenance technicians either. Practically the whole Saudi AF is maintained by foreigners, flown though by Saudis. One of my friends from school, he’s Pakistani and his dad used to fly for the UAEAF a while ago, and was an instructor on the Hawk I think(he’s an instructor on the Hawk in the NATO training school in Canada) and he says that tehy are very corrupt, that many pilots would not pass anything but would still get through with connections.

    in reply to: Potential for the A-50/F-50 Golden Eagle? #2623287
    Srbin
    Participant

    Aside from Hawk, A-50 is the only next generation of LIFT are ahead in development compared to others. MAKO I believe is still in blueprint stage, Aemarchi is in mock up stage, and MIG-AT have just had first flight test.

    Ahead in development? AFAIR Yak-130 production variant has already flown and it is about to enter service, M-346 prototype made it’s first flight not long after the A-50 did and Mig-AT wont enter any production yet unless it is bought by foreign customer.

    in reply to: Potential for the A-50/F-50 Golden Eagle? #2623448
    Srbin
    Participant

    What about the RC-400– Mica combination for the A-50? This would be possible right?
    Get 12 JAS 39 C/D Gripen doing dedicated A2A and 24 of the A-50 doing A2G and antishipping and secondary A2A with MICA BVR. This would be a potent force. A total of 36 aircraft all multirole. Give it tanker support and a couple of Erieye AWACS. Nice…….

    And why not just have one single type doing this? When it comes to maintenance, commonality and such it would be a lot more cost effective.

    in reply to: MiG-31 #2623456
    Srbin
    Participant

    I guess inertially guided would achieve the best surprise, I guess it can work a lot of times depending on if you know your enemy will go through there, and a lot of times you will probably know but sometimes you wont. Now how can you keep your emissions down really?

    in reply to: MiG-31 #2623757
    Srbin
    Participant

    I still kind of lack more info on the R-37M, it’s max g load and etc. If it’s something like 6-8 Gs it will be harder to outmaneuver, however if below that then it will be…..this all depends on how you would launch your missile.

    in reply to: MiG-31 #2623790
    Srbin
    Participant

    How hard would it be to fit this on it?

    in reply to: MiG-31 #2623835
    Srbin
    Participant

    Also, as to my understand, SAMs travel in pretty much straight trajectories, and if they do get close enough to an aircraft, the fuze will sense it and it will explode thereby damaging the aircraft. Now let’s say the R-37M at the end of the day is not maneuverable enough, can it be modified to do this too so if it does get close enough to an aircraft it can explode like this?

    in reply to: MiG-31 #2623848
    Srbin
    Participant

    So what would be the best way to fire the R-37M for the best surprise or for the best hitting chance at such a long range?

    in reply to: Russia ahead in BVRAAMs? #2623863
    Srbin
    Participant

    I’ve been looking for info on this SAM version, its sopposidely similar to the SLAMRAAM/CLAWS/Derby AD systems.

    in reply to: Thailand picks Swedish fighters over Russia's #2624033
    Srbin
    Participant

    I still think Thailand should’ve gotten more surplus F-16s and given them the ACE upgrade from Israel, get Popeye Lite, Spice, Whizzard kits, latest Gabriels, MSOV, Python 5, Derby(since I dont think US is giving the AIM-120) and WHATEVER. If this was not the option, I would’ve still gotten the A-50, which is a two seater and has similar performance to the Gripen could’ve been fitted with the same Israeli radar and the same weapons for twice the lower cost of the Gripen.

    in reply to: New Russian Kh-31PM upgrade #2055262
    Srbin
    Participant

    I see, what about Kh-31PD and AD? Those versions are said to have been developed and are essentially longer ranged too, but no other info is available on them.

    in reply to: Potential for the A-50/F-50 Golden Eagle? #2624038
    Srbin
    Participant

    Well the Javelin will fly in the next few weeks. And also I see a great advantage in letting a training pilot to fly in a safer two engined fighter.
    And don’t you dare to touch Natalie

    Next few weeks? Israel could’ve went for the M-346 if they wanted twin engined

    in reply to: MiG-31 #2624122
    Srbin
    Participant

    Ohhh RWRs lol

    Ok if SARH missile needs mid course guidance to hit a target, how does an ARH missile work then?

    Also, if a radar keeps signalling and guiding the missile, will the radar be detected or the missile, or both?

    in reply to: MiG-31 #2624127
    Srbin
    Participant

    RHAW? EMCON?

    So greater chance vs surprise? What exactly do you mean with this?

    in reply to: F-4F Phantom II pics for your viewing pleasure #2624140
    Srbin
    Participant

    Ahhh, F-4, Mig-21, far by the uglies planes around. Somehow I don’t like the Mig-23 either. F-5 is not so bad looking. MIII and Draken are beauties.

Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 1,678 total)