No, if we take the politics out even then the Cobra would win as they already operate it. If not the Cobra then probably the Ka-50-2.
I don’t give a crap about the political reasons, I just absolutely hate it when I tell people to exclude something and they still go and say it. I would just like to know who’s stronger
I think it’s the best get smaller numbers, though they have one disadvantage and that is that their range is smaller which means you’d have to spend money on tankers and/or waste hardpoints on fuel tanks.
I would however prefer lighter fighters, because a Mig-29/F-16 would stand of a good of a chance taking down a heavy Su-27 as a heavy F-14 would.
70 ancient F-16s which US wont let them upgrade to MLU nor will they give them AIM-120. What’s the point of having AIM-9 armed F-16s which would be never able to even survive Mig-21-93s in any sort of fight. It’s just better to invest in FC-1 or something like J-10.
I always thought it was the RD-33s that were fuel thristy and very expensive to operate which resulted in the early Mig-29As being very expensive to operate, so what is it?
I think it’s an excellent option, those standard F-35As would be suitable too to do CAS like F-18s, F-16s and A-10s were but except F-35Bs can operate from anywhere really.
But yes, F-35B armed with SDBs/JDAM and doing CAS from medium level or infact any fixed wing aircraft is imo much better than attack helicopters in the CAS role. Really the advantage of helicopters to operate from anywhere is gone with F-35B. I bet if US Army could operate fixed wing aircraft, they’d operate alot of F-35Bs.
isnt the Su-27-SM enough of a upgrade to last it till 2015 when Su-27’s service life will run out?
Typically Russian engines have lower life and are higher to maintain than their Western counterparts, especially when it’s pushing the state of the art hard(for it’s time). However the thing with Russian engines is that they’re much cheaper to build. Though even Western engines can sometimes be very problematic and a bitch.
they never did.
I think the best bet for MiG would be to make a single engined light fighter with the same engine as the PAK-FA will be using, it would be much better commonality and this would make it alot more attractive to RuAF to buy. I don’t think RuAF will ever in teh future buy something like they did two rather heavy twin engined fighters like they did back during the Cold War with Mig-29 and Su-27.
Ok lets say that this plane is made successfully and etc and lets say RuAF does buy it in smaller numbers, who else besides RuAF is going to buy it when everyone will be jumping to get the PAK-FA, which for sure is going to be around before this “new MiG”. I would rather work on a single engined light multirole fighter, if MiG can develop a light single engined plane with better performance and similar cost to the Mig-29M, then it’s all good. I am sure they have the expertise to do it.
Something like similar to the MAKO would be the best choice.
Maybe Russia is really into oil, but maybe not, but if they really were, do you think they would ever let other countries like Azerbaijan or Kazakhstan who have large oil supplies ever have independance if it was all about oil?
Hey, I thought Croatia was second not Serbia.
I am actaully not sure, it’s very hard to tell but I think they might’ve been similar.
I too thought that the acquisition of both of Mig-29s and F-18s for Malaysia was a bad choice, they should’ve just stuck with one of them. And now they will add a third type to their maintenance problem and even the less maintenance friendly Su-30MKM. Sure it’s capable but three fighter types + the Hawk is not easy to maintain and especially in lower numbers. Besides Thai AF is mostly Western oriented with Western style support infrastructure, adding something like the Flanker will be costly.
If they are scared so much of Indonesian, Indian, Malaysian and Viet Flankers, why not just get some S-300PMU2s or invest in S-400 and deploy it in critical points in the country where the Flankers would come from. A few S-400 batteries could cover the whole country and give Thailand unsurpassed ground Air Defense system.
Actually Slovenia was not really in the war like Croatia, Bosnia and Serbia and on top of all Slovenia was the richest Yugoslavian province, followed by Serbia and Croatia and Montenegro. Even after the war finished, Slovenian GDP/Capita I am sure was bigger than that of Greece and Portugal. Though there was a gap, it was not huge between the economies of Yugoslavian provinces/states.