dark light

Srbin

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,036 through 1,050 (of 1,678 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: missile for rafale #2670710
    Srbin
    Participant

    Gotta love it how US pushes something else to be bought and if it isn’t they will punish them. US only looks to satisfy itself in these deals and nothing else.

    in reply to: Peruvian Mig-29 info #2670824
    Srbin
    Participant

    There is no reason to get rid of the M2K now, it’s cheap to run, if you can sell it for a good price try if you can’t them upgrade with Russian Avionics and radars to perform strike and be the FAP’s second striker with SMT.

    in reply to: Boeing Begins Final Assembly of First Korean F-15K #2670829
    Srbin
    Participant

    wow people just don’t know how to stop. There is no point about talking about the Rafale anymore, yes it was the technical winner and ROKAF wanted it, but they choose the F-15K, so forget about it and move on.

    in reply to: Peruvian Mig-29 info #2671113
    Srbin
    Participant

    See I don’t know what FAP can do with the M2Ks, they would cost too much to upgrade. Why not though upgrade them with Russian weapons and avionics, this would greatly reduce maintenance and logistics support.

    I don’t think the more advanced upgraded Su-25s would need escort, they can use R-77 for self-defence.

    in reply to: missile for rafale #2671537
    Srbin
    Participant

    Do Singapore’s F-16’s carry AIM-120?

    in reply to: Peruvian Mig-29 info #2671540
    Srbin
    Participant

    Are the FAP MiG-29s are capable of upgrade to SMTs?

    Why not?

    You need multi-role trained pilots!
    Are 20 (stick to example) enough to do all tasks in wartime. 20:40 missions!

    Well I mean maybe not but why not purchase more Mig-29SMTs? But used ones and upgraded? They could come about 8-10mn per plane and to upgrade them a few million and for a maybe 10-12mn you got yourself a used Mig-29SMT.

    If I had to decide what to purchase in the future FAP (nothing in the inventory), I would have chosen the MiG-29SMT or Mirage-2000*?! In both cases limited to a single supplier to maintain capability of the weaponssystem. “All eggs in one basket”.

    Yes, and France has proved to be a unreliable supplier in this case. I would though upgrade the Mirage-2000s too and get as much from them as I could do. Perhaps them multirole too or perhaps leave them as strikers.

    in reply to: Peruvian Mig-29 info #2671565
    Srbin
    Participant

    Sounds much easier, than it is in reality. To do so, you must have bought a variant, which is capable for modification to multi-role. The savings are not in sight. Flying more hours with MiG-29 does not lead to less cost per flight hour. The Su-22 is not cheap too, but can do the attack-task with less cost per flying hour. Why to risk a much more expensive multi-role MiG-29 to ground defences in a CAS-mission.
    Poland kept its Su-22 for attack-missions and its MiG-29 for AD.
    Between Su-22 and MiG-29 is a given interoperationality. Similar systems under the skin. Drills and maintenance for example.
    If it is a F-16, it have been a good advice.

    Ok look at it this way
    Advantages of upgrading Mig-29 and retiring Su-22
    -With that you have less aircraft in your inventory
    -You have a better Air Superiority fighter(Mig-29SMT over Mig-29S), with better radar and other things
    -You have a MUCH better striker(Mig-29SMT over Su-22M2), with longer range, much better weapons & radar and many other things
    -You have a much better Aircraft to perform Anti Shipping(Mig-29SMT over Su-22M2) armed with longer ranged Yakhnots
    -Operating some 20 Multirole Mig-29SMTs is MUCH MUCH cheaper than operating some 20 Mig-29A/S for air superiority and some lets say 20 Su-22M2 Fitters. Even operating some 20 Mig-29SMTs is cheaper than to operate some 20 Mig-20A/S.

    Disadvantages:
    -Well there are less Aircraft to be everywhere, but I’d still rather pick 20 Multirole Mig-29SMTs over 20 Mig-29A/S and lets say 20 Fitters.

    -Neither would perform CAS, Su-25s to do that correct me if I am wrong

    in reply to: MiG-29SMTs and Ka-52s for Yemen #2671570
    Srbin
    Participant

    Wasn’t intended as “flamebait”. Just wondering if Russia could start up production and get these birds delivered within ten years. Hopefully Yemen will get those SMTs soon.

    Ok sorry, I misinterpreted it the wrong way.

    in reply to: F-16E/F aka Block 60 or F-18E/F Super hornet #2671642
    Srbin
    Participant

    I’m not inspired by the Block 60 design either. The specific wing loading is too high. It does not matter if you got higher thrust, higher thrust don’t mean a damn thing if you are required to have higher landing speeds (greater danger) on that thing, or have higher speed stall points when you are in ACM.

    CFTs do not add to that sense of confidence to your flight performance either.

    I much prefer the F-15K as the last great American fighter prior to the F-22/JSF generation.

    I am not sure but I don’t like either of them. I would agree with Crobato, teh F-15K is the best last great American fighter prior to F-22/F-35, but it is expensive.

    F-15K costs about 20 more million than the F-18E/F(which was offered for 80mn with all the goodies) and these later F-15Ks have been offered for aroudn 100mn. F-16E/F too has been sold for around 80mn to UAE. F-15K’s range is much bigger than Falcon’s or SH’s and it’s much more capable.

    in reply to: Peruvian Mig-29 info #2671645
    Srbin
    Participant

    dear srbin, that’s because you dont know why…
    i’ll tell you why, in 1995 sure we had M2k, but with the peace politics of the mid 80’s, to show truth intentions, the armed forces were downsized from the huge and totally irrealistic mamouth it was on the 70’s to a more according to economic reality of the 80’s and 90’s, the order for M2k was downsized from 36 to 12, but not only that, weapons orders were either cancelled or severely downsized, the intention was to cancel the whole M2k program but the french government did put pressure because contracts were signed, and the penalties would have been too hard on the downhill going peruvian economy, so the contract was re-negociated to 12 machines.
    now…in 1995 when the potatos started to burn (the surprise cenepa war) inmediatelly the peruvian government asked the french for the weapons needed for the defense of the country, guess what, the french said NO of course, they sell to ecuador as well, they also told them NO, but the diference is, they had a stockpile, we didnt.
    so actually the M2k was a good looking useless a/c.
    the americans decided to impose an embargo on weapons to both countrys, so not even russia will supply, so, what to do?, you need weapons, get them or die!, bieloruss couldnt care less about embargoes, for as long as you came with cash, wich is what happened, and it worked as the FAE, never came to challenge the Migs (talking about 97/98 before the final peace agreement) and when challenged (it did happened quite often, peruvian Migs orbiting inside ecuatorian airspace) they never came.

    Well you made that mistake of not buying the weapons earlier and now you learned not to trust the French.

    now srbin, do you still think it was a dumb idea?
    last i knew, was that FAP dont want a multirole Mig-29, they want a pure air superiority, so only a radar upgrade was needed and they did, plus a few R-77 and plenty of R-73, R-27 and R-60, the M2k now has its weapons and so the other machines. sure this kind of diversity is hard to maintain, the only solution is “true peace”, but…are you sure you can thrust with your life that kind’a neighbour?
    cheers to all:

    I know they don’t want a multirole Mig-29 but wouldn’t it be better to upgrade the Mig-29 to be a multirole machine and to retire the Su-22s and use the Mig-29 to do Su-22’s job? That would give you a better machien with better weapons, bigger range, no Su-22s there=no need to keep their infrastructure to support them there which would reduce costs. This would also give Mig-29’s pilots more training hours.

    The Russians are not mass producing it because they want an extended range version (R-77M or R-77PU), the Indians seem happy with the R-77 as do the Chinese, who are adding their own motor to improve performance.

    True, they are waiting for the extended range ramjet version which will have a really long range.

    I would say currently Peru is the best Airforce in Lating America, the Chile’s F-16blk50s with BVR are not there yet to challenge the few Mig-29s with R-77

    I still think it’d be better to upgrade the Mig-29 to do Fitter’s job. Also Peru could retire quite a few aircraft types to reduce their maintenance and support costs which are plaguing the Airforce.

    But if you still have that stupid President as you did a while ago, don’t expect any changes that will improve FAP.

    in reply to: MiG-29SMTs and Ka-52s for Yemen #2671663
    Srbin
    Participant

    Wonder if Russia will be able to deliver them within the next decade

    Flamebait, but just why not?

    in reply to: 50 MiG-29SMTs for Algeria? #2672473
    Srbin
    Participant

    the question is is Algeria going to replace their current Mig-29s or keep them and upgrade them?

    in reply to: 50 MiG-29SMTs for Algeria? #2672725
    Srbin
    Participant

    Numerous reports say it’s M and many other say it’s SMT.

    So what is it?

    in reply to: Peruvian Mig-29 info #2672951
    Srbin
    Participant

    I still think it was a very dumb action to purchase teh Mig-29, why operate the Mig-29 when teh Mirage-2000 was there already? It’s A2A capability is as good as that of the Mig-29, if they upgraded it in France and just gotten the newer weapons and MICA and other things with it, it would be a formidable aircraft. I just don’t understand why Peru was dissatisfied with their M2Ks for not being able to pick up any Mirage F.1s, but hey like the Mig-29s would’ve been just able to pick em up in the same way? I don’t think so.

    Purchasing the Mig-29 just added much more maintenance burden on teh PeAF. Su-25 is a great investment, better than any helicopter and that thing can really take the fire. I think also upgrading teh Fitters is a good idea and they can serve for still quite a long time. If not they could upgrade their Mig-29s to do the same A2G work as the Fitters did but just better.

    in reply to: Reviving big bombers for the USAF #2673024
    Srbin
    Participant

    How about buying some Tu-160s or proposed Tu-22M5s from Russia! 😛

Viewing 15 posts - 1,036 through 1,050 (of 1,678 total)