Yesterday @ Zhukovskii:

Showtime, one day you will “take control of yrself”……but you will NEVER, EVER, control any of Hot Dog’s threads!!!

I’d like to congratulate Deino & the PRC on their latest counterfeit.

Ares in love:

http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&newspaperUserId=27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3af6fb6f94-889a-4278-9b36-98d22508774f&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest

It may not be as remote a possibility as you suggest;)

Agreed. 😉

I wonder if the RAF’s next gen. striker will get any ideas from the T-50’s “conservative” air intake design :rolleyes:

I’ve got a feeling Team PAK-FA are going for all-aspect LO as alluded to by the head of NPO Saturn’s PAK-FA engine programme, who stated the 5G engine would have 2-D nozzles. Correct me if I’m wrong, but hasn’t that tail boom/stinger been carefully stealth shaped?, why bother if they’re going to leave the nozzles as is?……personally, I would expect them to (at the very least) better the F-35, but fall short of the F-22’s RCS figures.

Excellent video, btw, Pesho- thanks. 😎

Q. does the F-22 supercruise @ M 1.7? as reported by a Russian news site, claiming the RuAF requirement for the 5G engine is M 1.5, and the current engine (117) will only facilitate M 1.3.