I don’t know, but it bugs me how the engineers keep messing with the rudder design–they’re the ones who are … 😉
As the spinal/Su-27 airbrake has been discarded to accomodate fuel (now 11,500kg, an increase of some 20%), the airbrake function is delegated to differentially deflected rudders, slightly visible on the pre-take off pic.
[ATTACH]160603[/ATTACH]
“…what do you mean the PAK-FA’s been delayed again?”
They have also ‘eliminated’ the large dorsal airbrake – presumably to house more fuel?
Ken
Yeah, more than 2 tonnes increase compared to standard Su-27 (ferry range 2,430nm), other points:
Lighter airframe than Su-27 due to increase Al, Ti & composites applications;
FADEC for engine & 3D TVC; (117C) has enlarged fan and air intake, redesigned turbine with better cooling; reprofiled cockpit canopy(?)- pilot seems to ‘sit’ higher; Fly-By-Light(?) LO material treatment.
I think ‘Irbis’ with an active array (developed by Tikhomirov-NIIP) will equip this fighter when it enters service with RuAF in 2011/12 (which will also be the fore-runner to PAK-FA’s AESA). With Phazatron’s AESA upgrade slated for the MiG-31BM in a similar time-frame.
The passive set, imho, is for export only (primarily China- explaining PLAAF officers swarming all over it throughout MAKS’07). Also, Sukhoi can’t seriously hope to offer the passive Irbis against the APG-81/F-35 in the Brazilian AF tender- whatever the brochure hype, though their neighbour Chavez already loves it.
Can anyone ID this (Sukhoi) cockpit simulator?
[ATTACH]160565[/ATTACH]
A senior IAF/MoD/HAL delegation is on an official visit to Russia where they will detail Indian involvement in (their) variant.
Later, they’ll meet with M. Pogosyan and visit KnAAPO (Yuri Gagarin Centre) to view the assembly of PAK-FA prototype(s), underway since last December…
…recent estimates put the development cost of Indo-Russian variant at $8 billion!!
an overview:
http://www.ato.ru/rus/cis/archive/19-2007/def/def2/
Source: Sukhoi & The Hindu Times.
Just yesterday, Bruce Carlson, the 4-star in charge of Air Forcr Materiel Command, says he still intends to purchase 380 F-22s to support ACC’s needs. The story goes that F-35 doesn’t have the performance to take care of the PLAAF hordes that may attack Taiwan.
Taiwan’s economic asymilation with mainland China grows ever closer year-on-year. Just so long as there’s no repeat of a global depression as in 1929, then the Communist party will not be forced into nationalistic jingoism & invade Taiwan to retain it’s grip on power. However, such a possibility is remote as double-digit sustained growth in China is likely to continue.
Incidently, those US concerns that have refused a China Sovereign Wealth Fund stake on ‘national security grounds’ are likely to welcome Chinese cash with open arms in a years’ time if even the most optimistic forecasts for the US economy ring true.
So, in short, neither futures of the F-22 or F-35 look rosy- especially if the Democrats get in as the ‘Chinese Horde’ argument is unlikely to hold sway- and rightly so, China has every right to modernise it’s armed forces- it goes hand-in-hand with being an economic superpower.
Gordon England has picked his moment carefully, Jung would be proud.
Hhhhmm i’d put France ahead of Russia in terms of quality to be honest, the Rafale is far more advanced then any Russian jet. Infact i would go so far to say that Russia is really slipping behind, what with the imaginary PAK_FA plane that for the last god knows how many years has been just a year away from flying, its painfully obvious to all but the most unblinkered eyes that there is no aircraft, just a paper plane.
I bet you’re a really lonely guy JJ…never mind gives you more time to choose your next ‘quirky’ avatar I guess. Goodbye.:)
The Iraqi air defences were still considered a really formidable air defense by everyone at the time if you think back to that era, i remember all the hype before the war then about how the Iraqi MIGs were gonna cream the coalition and how amazing and tough the air defenses were. In the end it ended up getting creamed.
Don’t believe the blurb…..believe Theodore Postol (professor of science, technology, and national security policy at MIT), instead 🙂 :
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/05/20/patriot_missile/
Russia’s greatest weapon is the $100 barrel of crude, which renders all other considerations secondary.
I’d take an Su-30MKI/MKM over ANY Western 4/4+ gen. fighter, ANYDAY:cool: (and so it seems would the Indians & more specifically the Malaysians)…and maybe even the Australians?
Moscow State University has a spanking new IBM Blue Gene/P.
Promised to use it strictly for civil research 😮
SKIF Cyberia (Tomsk State University)
[ATTACH]160381[/ATTACH]:)
Addenda: The IBM Blue Gene/P 27.8Tflops (pk) will be operational in April, however, IBM & IT have presented another (unspecified) supercomputer (20Tflops pk) to Ufa State Aviation Technical University where “the first task the system will have to fulfill is modeling processes taking place in the combustion chamber of an aircraft engine” (Ufa is subcontractor to NPO Saturn on the PAK-FA engine).
…oh and a brand new experimental test centre at Rubinsk.
It’s probably better to start over at this point using the lessons they’ve learned.
That’s probably what the 2 IBM supercomputers at NPO Saturn are for…
[ATTACH]160358[/ATTACH]
After spending the last few days browsing the net about this aircraft and trying to take in the information available about it would appear this jet is seriously late, the MFI’s from MIG were a complete waste of time as was the forward swept wing flanker.Reading between the lines i’d say the Russians know theres no way they can compete with the Raptor so there franticly changing the design fairly often as they try to figure just what they can market this thing, now it seems there trying to say it will be ‘differant’ from the raptor and not comparable. Well one things for sure they really don’t know what the hell there doing with this as they didnt with the MFI or forward winged Flanker
To use those immortal words of Wolfgang Pauli, you’re “Not Even Wrong”:cool:
The B-1B’s intakes were not completely blocked. I dorked with the brightness settings on the image below (one I took at the USAF Museum) and you can make out compressor faces in there.
Addenda, in the B-1B’s case, it’s not so much line-of-sight: