dark light

aurcov

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 661 through 675 (of 1,239 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: KC767, KC330….what latest? #2481566
    aurcov
    Participant

    Indeed, why develop the AIM-9X? Asraam or IRIS-T would fit the bill

    Only ASRAAM was developed earlier than the 9X and it was evaluated by USAF/USN as a replacement for the M; and it failed in meeting US requirement; IRIS-T was later than the 9X.

    in reply to: Super Hornet buy to be reconsidered. #2481983
    aurcov
    Participant

    Don’t mix the LRIP with full-rate production prices. The first units are going to cost much more than full-rate production ones. Also where you red the $ 80 mil for EF? That’s not even the flyaway price (that excludes service, logistic tail, weapons, training).

    in reply to: Super Hornet buy to be reconsidered. #2482032
    aurcov
    Participant

    While the price of F 22 incresed dramatically as the total numbder decreased (~ 700 to 187), the F 35 is suposed to be built in > 2000. So the analogy is not appliable.

    in reply to: Super Hornet buy to be reconsidered. #2482061
    aurcov
    Participant

    Not only the EF2000 is much cheaper but why do you think that it doesn’t met the F-35 capabilities ?

    Since when is the EF 2000 cheaper than the F 35 ???????

    in reply to: Modern Military Aviation News from around the world #2482515
    aurcov
    Participant

    16 AESA radars ordered for F 15 C

    Raytheon will deliver 16 APG-63(V)3 radars for F 15 C (8 for ANG and 8 for USAF), including spares and service. Total cost is ~ $ 90 milions ($ 5.6 milion per copy) http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/micro_stories.pl?ACCT=149999&TICK=RTN&STORY=/www/story/03-17-2008/0004775257&EDATE=Mar+17,+2008

    in reply to: the PAK-FA saga, continued2…… #2482517
    aurcov
    Participant

    Regarding sensor fusion the Soviets/Russians had integrated fire control systems that allow the IRST, Radar, and helmet mounted sight to all work together targetting an enemy aircraft more than 20 years ago… in operational service. Along with high offboresight AAMs and datalinks the PVO already had much of what the US likes to call net centric capability in service.
    The electronics in the Mike and Lima Sidewinders of the time might have been smaller and used less power but the R-73 was a better weapon period.

    Integrated fire system (radar+IRST+HMS) were indeed present on MiG 29 and Su27 from the begining. However sensor fusion is something different: multiple sensors (radar, RWR/ESM, AWACS/Rivet Joint/EA 6, other fighters) integrated in order to present a unified picture on display. That’ s more difficult. Even the SuperHornet (the best avionics in US except the Raptor) can’t claim sensor fusion, but only MSI (multi sensor integration).

    Regarding WVR missile, IMO, the Lima and Mike were the trully revolutionary weapons in WVR: for the first time a taget could be attacked frontal, not only from behind (ask the Argentinians and Syrians for details 😀 ). The R 73 brig a wider field of view and superior maneuvrability thanx to the TV, but is evolutionary.

    aurcov
    Participant

    Well it wasn’t the Russians… it was the Soviets… and now that is the Ukraines problem because Chernobyl is in the Ukraine.

    And the most exposed areas were in Belarus…

    S-400 sell depends on time frame. In 10 years time World will be completely different place. It is not only military strategist but investment bankers/Commodity/Currency traders that report to Kremlin.

    No matter if selling such an advanced system would bring loads of $$$, security concerns should stop the Russians to sell S X00 to such imprevisible regimes. Up to now, Russia didn’t sold them to Iran for example, who, unlike NK could afford them, at least in limmited numbers (Tor doesn’t count since it’s a short range system). Opposing the US stance vs. NK or Iran is one, selling them sophisticated weapons is another thing.

    Dont confuse Turbine inefficiencies with Nuclear technology.

    You didn’t understand. Russians reactors, offered now commercially, for domestic and foreign utilites are VVER (wich are light water reactors, or more preciselly the equivalent of PWR in West). What I meant was, that even if the Russians are very good in “exotic” reactors (they even sold fast breeder technology to Japan for ~ $ 1bn.) those are in experimental stage except one (BN 600). So, up to now they are not (yet) interesting for customers for various reason (safety, proliferation risk).

    in reply to: Russians populations thought on their military #2484773
    aurcov
    Participant

    Iraq already was a decent society in the 80s.. Guess what, it was under Saddam. 😎

    No, it frankly shows your lack of knowledge.

    Thanks to Saddam’s rule, Iraq at the end of 70s was one of the more modernized countries in terms of living standards and law in middle east.

    No it shows you remarkable lack of intellect. Iraq in the 1980’s was not that far behind the west in terms of society and even state function. The Baathist regime was liberal and secular. Sure Saddam’s overseas exploits undermined his achievements but that does not take away the fact that his regime was actually pretty modernist.

    I think that you all missed one little point: while the Sadam regime was a modern, secular (especially compared with S Arabia ot Iran), it clearly treated differently the ~ 25 % or so Sunni vs. Shia or Kurds. I think that making a dictatorship looking nice only because it was eliminated by US it’s a little to much.

    Iraq’s neighbors are as follows: Iran, Kuwait, Jordan, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Turkey. Please provide exact dates of Iraqi invasions to Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Syria. Thanks.

    So, if it’s not a big deal to attack only two countries, US is not so bad after all? :p

    aurcov
    Participant

    How could a country where the average person is starving afford to build ICBMs and nuclear warheads?

    Are they really starving? I allways thought that’s western propaganda BS…:p …Firstof all, I don’t think that Russia will sell S 400 NK .

    So if it is hard for Fiji to make ICBMs then it is also hard for Russia to make ICBMs?

    Nukes are expensive to built and maintain. Russians ones are no exception.

    Because it was Western and therefore crap. Or after looking at the wiki entry I’d say it was a successful operation by the Soviet Union to sabotage the whole project… RPGs and all…
    The US has also tried liquid metal cooled nuclear reactors for Subs which also failed… guess the Soviets shouldn’t try that… no wait… the liquid sodium cooled reactor has already been developed in the Soviet Union…

    Liquid metal cooled program in Russia was one of the most succesfull-BN 600 still runing; however, future power generation reactors planned in Russia are still LWR.

    aurcov
    Participant

    The Russians are planning a lot of things; however, there is noway that rail would beat large container ships, especailly on such huge distances.

    aurcov
    Participant

    Wow

    nuclear weapons are relatively cheap to make and store… and hide. (If so, why are only a few countries able to produce such weapons.?)
    Their conventional forces are designed to defend Russian territory… not keep in line lots of occupied countries to form a buffer zone. A small but effective conventional force (present day Russian army doesn’t qualify)and an enormous and very powerful nuclear force would be very cheap to maintain. A few Plutonium breeder reactors (the only one that did work, the SuperPhoenix was closed; I wonder why?:p ) generating power and producing weapons grade plutonium would build up weapon stocks rapidly and reduce internal consumption of the export product that earns big money…

    aurcov
    Participant

    Yeah, well you really need to learn to read… are you suggesting that as the title of this thread states that if North America develops an ICBM shield to protect itself from ICBM strikes by 2020 do you think North Korea and Iran wont have S-400s by then?

    :p How is going NK to pay for dozens of S 400? BTW, the YAL will operate regardless of clouds.

    in reply to: KC767, KC330….what latest? #2489817
    aurcov
    Participant
    in reply to: KC767, KC330….what latest? #2489819
    aurcov
    Participant

    In this case, USAF should have stated clearly from the beginning that they need a big tanker; in this case the 777 would have been unbeatable, considering its dominance in that class.

    in reply to: Thrust Vectoring…..is it all really worth it? #2489826
    aurcov
    Participant

    Nope, the ugliest part is the nose- really scarry…

Viewing 15 posts - 661 through 675 (of 1,239 total)