The Drift Sight had an external view downward. The navigator tracked an object on the ground below the aircraft, and the resulting drift angle was read off the dial.
Bri 🙂
It seems that nobody else in the world has had an amusing incident. Has humour died?
Bri :confused:
Whatever you buy, don’t forget to secure it in the panel as well as possible!
In the RAAF, we lost so many aircraft clocks that us ‘Instrument Bashers’ eventually had to secure them with ‘shear-off head’ screws.
I did this job on our 2 Squadron Canberras – and those screws were a right b’d to get out when we had to remove the clocks for servicing!
Bri 😀
I don’t remember much about the film, but the theme music lingers fondly in the memory. It was probably the only piece of music that had a whistling solo, and was very ‘hummable’. Wish I could get an MP3 of it.
Bri 🙂
That’s a pretty little plane. Haven’t seen or heard of it before. From memory, most of Potez’ planes were ugly monsters.
But four Astazous must have sounded sweet. And the cabin windows look like they were nicked from a Caravelle!
Bri 😀
Well, I certainly got a learned response to my query! Thanks lads.
OK, so the planes have to be multi-role now. And of course you can’t reduce the size of the pilot and his ejection seat (well, the Folland seat was smaller). But the points I was trying to raise are still valid.
As all electronics systems are now digital, using micro-chips, and easily re-programmable for different roles, the systems should be a lot smaller. Less wiring, too, if you include opto-electronics. And numbers of instruments have been reduced to a few MFDs.
Fly by wire must be more compact too. The engines of today are far more fuel efficient, so not so much fuel is required.
Sorry, but I still think they are too huge and heavy!
Can’t accept the criticism of the Gnat and Lightning. The IAF liked the Gnat so much, they developed it into the Ajeet.
Bri 🙂
Yep, watched it too…..great film, shame about the commentary! It would have been hard to find a scriptwriter who knew less about commercial aviation and how aircraft actually work. Can’t blame the narrator, he was just reading the drivel.
Exactly what I thought. I was thinking the script must have been written by a 10-year old! The over-emphasis on ‘danger’ made me want to turn off. Mind you, the ‘breakers’ kept on about it too.
Many years ago, myself and four other RAAF airmen had to ‘reduce’ half a dozen Lincolns and we were given one and a half days to do each one (not 12 weeks)! I removed the instruments and oxygen equipment; the engine and airframe fitters chopped the plane up with axes, standing on the bits they chopped off!
Yes, I do know a 747 is a little bigger, with more bits…
Bri :diablo:
Bri,
it IS a CAC Sabre, A94-983.
We passed some of our Sabres to Indonesia and also to the Malaysian AF, the main reason we passed Sabres to Indonesia was to try and improve what were at the time very very strained relations between Australia and Indonesia, as we had more or less come to the brink of war during the 1960’s.It also benefitted the RAAF as they knew that should it have come to a shooting match again during the Sabre’s service with the TNI-AU that we would have the superior fighter in the form of the Mirage III.
I know about the strained relations, as I was involved, serving in RAAF Darwin at the time! Not a lot of people know this, but one week we had the biggest exercise ever, with virtually every aircraft the RAAF had visiting. Canberras, Sabres, Hercs, Dakotas the lot.
The ‘enemy’ leader (!) transitted the base while it was on. Then, as soon as he left, all the planes were flown back to base. I understand he was given a tour of the bases after he left us. Presumably all this was to make him think we had a much larger air force!
Incidentally, it was touch and go whether the CAC Sabres would make it to Darwin. We were told that if there was a more than 5 knot headwind, they would have to turn back. As it was, they landed with only kerosene fumes in the tanks and some had to be towed off the runway.
I was doing turn-around servicing on the Hercs, and spent so much time working, fell asleep standing up when entering fuel states!
Bri 🙂
PS: I worked on A84-232 on 2 Squadron and at 3AD. I remember it well!
Slightly ‘off piste’, I know, but the centre-line ‘fighter-type’ cockpit canopy of the USAFs B-57 looks familiar.
Was it an existing canopy used on another type of aircraft, or specially designed for their Canberras?
Incidentally, I think it looked better then the EE version.
Bri 🙂
The ‘flying bicycle’ was a feature every year at the marvellous Naval Air Shows held at HMS Daedalus, Lee on Solent. A rating was carried under a helicopter on a bike fitted with a stabilising fin.
Something else they did was to air-drop a car onto the runway, and it ended up about one foot thick!
I have a collection of photos from those shows, but have never figured out how to include pics on this forum.
Bri 🙂
But as was discussed in another topic. Those are clearly not passengers. Half of them are in camo and the other half are in what appears to be a military uniform. Utter bull if you ask me.
Sorry lads. Disn’t see the other post.
Bri 🙂
Have you tried Amazon and Ebay? I got a set of Concorde Maintenance Manuals on CD from Ebay.
Bri 🙂
Those IL-62s were certainly elegant airliners. Great shots.
Bri 🙂
As someone who WAS there, enduring a great deal of bombing in London as a boy, I know that these people who criticise everything done by the British in World War II do so out of ignorance. Ergo: they weren’t there.
They have also been brainwashed by people in the media who present only the facts they want to present. Anyone who knows me know what I think of people in the media!
Bri 🙂
Serious turbulence is a feature of that part of the world, as there are active volcanoes.
Many years ago, a JAL 747 broke up with all passengers lost over Mount Fuji (I think). From past experience, turbulence hits you all of a sudden.
Incidentally, SAS recommend keeping seat belts fastened all the time you are in your seat.
Bri