dark light

tenthije

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,686 through 2,700 (of 4,177 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Someone got bored… #632208
    tenthije
    Participant

    the first bit of the cowling on the top pic is blue, but should be orange. The first bit on the bottom picture is orange, but should be blue. That’s it. Hardly important if you ask me? Makes for a change, even if it may look a bit sloppy.

    in reply to: Dusseldorf trip #632210
    tenthije
    Participant

    The viewing terrace at pier B is quite good although views can be cluttered with ramplice and the emergency stair cases. The viewing terrace at the train station is nothing short but a godsent. It is awesome because it is close to the taxiway as well as the first runway, mostly take-offs. The remote runway, mostly landings, can be photographed with a long lense (250+ mm). Best of all, no clutter and the sun is in your back for most of the day. Only mid to late afternoon (depending on time of year) will the sun get in front of you.

    in reply to: International Flight Sim / Aviation Conventon 2005 #632212
    tenthije
    Participant

    let the drooling begin!

    This is part of the demonstration package at the Luchtvaart Hobby Shop (Aalsmeerderbrug, near Schiphol). A fully active MSFS04 based B737NG flight deck. You can buy the set in pieces. Each of the pieces starting at around 250euros and going up rapidly. Total set will set you back a few 1000 euros. (1,5 euro is roughly 1 pound)

    tenthije
    Participant

    Will this affect the opening of the Concorde? I hope this will not be used as an excuse to close her off.

    in reply to: First UA Express Embraer E170. (pic) #633014
    tenthije
    Participant
    in reply to: The other Hercules??? Almost that is… #2641758
    tenthije
    Participant

    The Shaanxi photo in reply 4 has the same hangar on it as in reply. Therefore the hangar is real despite the red white and blue.

    Those colours are used by dozens of countries so they do not mean anything.

    in reply to: Residents could get £10,000 to escape airport noise #633093
    tenthije
    Participant

    That does not seem a good deal. Buying a similarly sized house in an area with no/little noise will surely cost more than 10,000 and the proceedings from selling the old place.

    Also I can not understand BAA only insulating key buildings like schools and hospitals. Would it not be wiser to insulate the whole lot? Sure it would be expensive but it would also cut back on complaints a lot. It has become common practise at AMS and most (all?) Dutch airports.

    in reply to: cryptic codes #633526
    tenthije
    Participant

    I would personally kill anyone that changed or proposed to change the airport codes. The thought of having to change every airport code in the computer system of the transport company I work for is enough to give me the shivers. Really, you should not mess with something that is working really well.

    For passengers it may not always be logical. Well, so what? How many airports display their flights just by IATA/ICAO code? How many tickets are printed with just the IATA/ICAO code? There are none, the city and/or airportname are always listed as well. It’s only us geeks that are interested in IATA/ICAO codes.

    Us geeks may also like to know that to some extend the 3 letter codes are also used for seaports. At least within the company I work for so I am assuming this is used worldwide. If I want to ship a container to the port of Houston I enter HOU, Montreal is YUL etc.

    in reply to: Welcome to the departure lounge! #633613
    tenthije
    Participant

    Ryanair B732 “Jaguar” at STN. As some of you may know there are massive windows at STN so great photos as well. All pre-digi and at my parents home though so I can’t show off this time. 😉

    in reply to: what happened next? #633624
    tenthije
    Participant

    air scandic vs cessna something

    cessna something should win that one

    in reply to: Personality test #1961534
    tenthije
    Participant

    that’s just scarily accurate!

    in reply to: Branson close to deal for Nigerian Airline #633699
    tenthije
    Participant

    Maybe a silly question, but what does SRB want in Nigeria? This is not likely to become a big money maker as Nigeria is not the wealthiest of nations by a long shot. Besides, is he not already commited to the American venture? That will probably take up a lot of his time and definately a lot of his money!

    in reply to: Bexx Banished from the Skies #634674
    tenthije
    Participant

    They’ve always been an od bunch. They once advertised flights from NRN (Niederrhein). I swear to god that this was their itinerary:

    NRN > FRA = busride
    FRA > bulgaria = plane
    bulgaria > FRA = plane
    FRA > NRN = busride

    remember, they where advertising flights from NRN! I don’t think even Ryanair would pull such a stunt.

    in reply to: Field performance or lack of! #634678
    tenthije
    Participant

    Old cars become collectors cars, old furniture becomes prized antiques.

    But you won’t find a single taxi company driving around collectors cars in regular day to day usage. It is simply not economical compared to a new(ish) S-class or 5-series. For special occaissions like weddings and funerals old cars are still used indeed, but at an added price. A price your average Ibiza holidayer is not willing to pay.

    Aviation does have an equivalent to collector cars though. There are numerour DC-3s, Ju-52s, DH.89s etc flying around in Europe for the enthiousiasts and for people who want a thrill. But you won’t find these planes in regular day to day usage, not in Europe and North America anyway.

    One thing about the some of the new generation of aircraft people rave on about, they have poor field performance when compared to older jets.

    I’ll grant you te poor field performance. Modern jets for the most part are not as capable of frequent rough field operations.

    Only the Russians still make such planes. For good reason too, Russian planes predominately operate in Russia and the CIS. There the runways are of mixed quality, to put it mildly.

    In the west the runways are well maintained and usually rather long. Therefore the need for rough field operations no longer exists in Europe. These days the passengers would not even accept a landing on a runway with potholes. Let’s face it, we have all been spoiled beyond belief!

    If I were a charter carrier I would not touch the 738 or 321 with a barge pole. I would want an aircraft that could fly in or out of anywhere within its range. I may wish to start flights to a small Greek Island or holidays to GIB and I want an aircraft than can fly to these destinations unhindered.

    GB Airways regularly flies their A320s and A321s to Gibraltar.

    Also, you should not plan your fleet to be able to fly ANYWHERE within range. You should plan your fleet to reach ANY place where money can be made. Most of the people will stay at large well known places where they are joined by 100s if not 1000s other tourists. Hence the local airports are well equiped to handle A321s and B738s.

    Of course there are also people that want to fly to remote places. But those people are too few to warrant an ECONOMICAL operation to some Ryanair style remote outpost.

    Speaking of Ryanair, they fly their B738s to a lot of small airports. They seem to be able to do so quite nicely, despite regularly loading their planes well over the 80% mark (or so they claim). Obviously the B738 must be quite capable to handle such flights.

    Dont knock older aircraft. they are still capable.
    True indeed. An old plane can fly really nicely. The thing is, can it fly economical? This increasingly is no longer the case for the B732. Maintenance costs are increasing. Spare parts for some components are harder to get. They seat fewer passenger thereby getting less income per flight.

    The final thing that killed of the B732 (and with it various other 1st and 2nd generation jets and loads of russian jets) are environmental laws. The plane is so noisy and emits so much contaminants that the plane is no longer ALLOWED in, or when it is only at a much inflated cost.

    The reason the B732 is still going strong in Africa, Asia, South America etc is because the rules are not as strict there. Another reason is the lack of money by the operators. If the airlines still using B732s could afford the B735 opr the B736 (the best comparable planes) they probably would.

    in reply to: Another crazy Binter shot! #635177
    tenthije
    Participant

    just look at the artificial horizon, the plane is not nearly going as steep as the photo implies

Viewing 15 posts - 2,686 through 2,700 (of 4,177 total)