I don’t know how others feel about this (and this is a daily mail article so whether every fact is correct must be called into question), but I’m appalled by the Lufthansa captain’s decision – quite frankly he should be suspended by the airline.
Now don’t get me wrong; the 767 pilot who offered his help gets my praise – but for all the captain knew, this stranger could have been a terrorist.
If my first officer goes down ill (possibly poisoned?) and the next thing I know I’ve got a complete stranger claiming he’s a qualified pilot offering his help out of the blue – alarm bells should start to ring.
I didn’t think passengers were allowed into the cockpit during flight?
The captain could have landed the aircraft by himself (this happens more frequently than you might imagine, a couple of years ago a continental first officer had to land a 777 by himself after the captain suffered a cardiac arrest over the Atlantic). Or, if need be, the captain could have asked for a cabin crew member to read off check-lists and provide an extra pair of eyes.
There’s definitely some growth potential for mainland European flag carriers in Britain’s outer-city areas.
As Charlie points out; 750,000 people now have a connection to one of Europe’s busiest hubs. Kent is just one of many under-served areas to tap into, look at the South West.
I’m sure United B747-400’s used to fly in during the summer. I got one in August 2011 and also one back in 2009.
That’s what I thought? Aren’t they a year round thing? They fly to/from San Fran
It’s great for passengers – more choice, more competition, lower fares 🙂
But, what the hell is VS thinking – do they honestly think it will be profitable? Maybe if they didn’t employ their annalists from London Metropolitan, they might see more sense?
A quote from today’s FT “Some analysts have expressed doubts about the decision to move into the highly-competitive, short-haul market. Large network operators, such as BA, have struggled to make short-haul operations profitable in the face of fierce competition from low-cost carriers, such as EasyJet and Ryanair.
But the Virgin’s management rejects those suggestions, pointing out that BMI used to provide valuable feeder traffic to Virgin Atlantic’s long-haul flights at Heathrow. It estimates its nascent short-haul network could generate 1.5m feeder passengers per year.”
1.5 million passengers a year? 😮 I’m no mathematician, but let’s do the maths.
1.5m ÷ 365 = 4110 passengers per day.
(Let’s assume each new Virgin A319 can carry ~140 passengers each)
4110 ÷ 140 = ~29 flights per day.
…Excuse me, but didn’t Virgin gain 12 slot pairs (24 slots)? Either VS is over-estimating, or something doesn’t add up…
i remember my first S340 flight on an LH from Frankfurt, the climb after take off seemed very slow, i think it was a fuel saving technique?
Maybe? Or maybe because it has hair-dryers for engines? :p
love the United livery on the B747
I don’t really like it, I always thought the Continental tail design was too crude and angular! Bring back the tulips!!! :diablo:
Great shots! Blue skies and sunshine + LHR = great photos… There’s blue skies here now, in fact 🙂
Is it true that you can sometimes actually see the A346 cabin flexing in flight?
That sounds like a Boeing fan-boy myth to me. :p If it were true, the stresses on the air frame would be immense, surely?
After looking over the comments and speaking to my brother-in-law (a photographer for a leading motor magazine), I’m probably going to go with a Nikon D70 and one of these.
It’s realistically the most viable option given my budget (I’ve had to raise it to around £210, inc. lens).
Does anyone see any major issues? Thanks for your help.
EDIT: Oh, and my brother-in-law also introduced me to London Camera Exchange (despite the name they actually have branches all over the country) – they sell really cheap second hand DSLR bodies. Plus all products are cleaned and checked for damage before being published on the website. I’ll be saving around £25 on the D70 over the cheapest one on ebay.
I suppose I might as well conclude, the return flight (UAL 110) was apparently nearly 100% full. And you know what American’s are like? They take everything but the kitchen sink; the over-head bins were practically overflowing so hand luggage had to be stowed in the hold.
Apparently the crew had meticulously timed the departure so they could be “number one” (said in a strong American accent) into Heathrow from the US. The flight was only about 6 hours long.
Wasn’t one of the main selling points of the A340 its reliability?
When the A340 was planned and designed in the 1980s, engines weren’t nearly as reliable as they are today. It was thought passengers (and airlines) would be more willing to fly aircraft with 4 engines compared to those with 2 over oceanic legs (eg. Atlantic/Pacific).
When South African Airways announced it was looking into ordering a new long haul aircraft in the late 90’s – Boeing and Airbus both sent their latest models to Jo’burg to woo the SAA CEO. Both had scheduled demonstration flights for the same day with Boeing being up first with their 777.
As the aircraft (with Boeing and SAA executives on-board) reached 80 knots on take-off the port engine experienced a compressor stall and the take-off was abruptly aborted.
Whilst the Boeing engineers scratched their heads, the SAA CEO was lead to the A340 by, then CEO of Airbus, Jean Pierson. The A340 demonstration flight went without a hitch, and afterwards Pierson said jokingly “You see, with the A340, you always have three extra engines – just in case.” And with that, the deal was pretty much sealed… Of course, back then oil was around the $20 per barrel mark.
It never really occurred to me before, but flybe has a sound business model – rural communities need to fly too! 🙂
Probably not.
Like LHR, slots at LGW are gold-dust. Whoever gets the slot will likely use it on a more lucrative route. I believe the majority of MAN-London traffic is feeder? Given most of Gatwick is ruled by point to point LCCs I doubt anyone will pick it up.
If a route’s being dropped, there’s usually a reason $$$ :p
D300 for £100-£150 range ???
According to ebay, whether they’re fully functioning is perhaps another matter?
Just because they don’t operate under the same brand name (eg. when Delta merged with Northwest) doesn’t mean they haven’t merged.
BA and Iberia have merged but keep separate brand names, just like Air France KLM.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8608667.stm
It even says “merger” in the first sentence of the stronger together page of the BA website.
http://www.britishairways.com/travel/british-airways-and-iberia/public/en_gb?cookiesAccepted=newvispop
And can I ask? If BA and Iberia do indeed keep their finances separate, why are all new aircraft orders placed through IAG? I’m of the understanding the profits are pooled into IAG and funds are taken out when necessary (eg. new aircraft purchases). The fact neither Iberia or BA has posted an annual report since 2010 would also suggest their finances are now tied with IAG.