If women were easy to understand there’d be no reason to drink 😀 It’s genetic engineering to get us down the pub.
JC
I cut my teeth on a variety of 50’s, 100’s and 125’s in the early 80’s and then went to 4 wheels. In 1997 I took my DA course on a GN124 and a Suzuki GS500.
My first “real” bike was a 600 Bandit that I near wrote off after 3000 miles and 6 months! As soon as the injuries healed (4 weeks – broken arm and lots of bruises) I picked up a brand new GSXR600WW that I owned until about 3 months ago. At the moment I don’t really miss it as there’s too much else going on at home and at work but I’ll probably start pining next year when things calm down! During the same period my other half had a CBR600 (1989 model – too heavy for her), SV650 (not fast enough) and an R6 (she loved that).
I would really like a trackday bike – roads aren’t fun. I’ve lost too many friends and aquaintences recently on the roads, mostly through poor car drivers (how about someone changing the wheel on their caravan on a blind bend. Rider paraplegic, pillion killed) 🙁
JC
BIKELESS
What hog wash.
Prove it then 🙂 In normal conditions, with average drivers/riders a decent sports bike will be faster from A to B on the road than a car. I was always able to easily outpace any car on the road by using traffic conditions and performance.
An R1 or a Fireblade won’t disgrace itself on a closed circuit against 90% of road cars (except for serious kit costing Megabucks or something really focused like a Radical or a Caterham type Mmmmm Radical ).
A secondhand R1 will set you back £4K and will do 165mph and 0-60 mph in 3 secs. What car for £4K will do that?
Hog wash? 🙂
JC
Definitely – what a muppett! Doing it is stupid enough, admitting why is priceless!
JC
I’ll know it’s gone too far if they try to remake any of the Harry Palmer films (Ipcress File etc). Austin Powers doesn’t count by the way.
JC
Just remember that 99% of everything mentioned so far wouldn’t have a prayer against a sports bike over 600cc on the road 🙂
Just trying to think of the worst car that I’ve owned – most embarrassing was a Nova Saloon, but the most unreliable and frightening was a Dolomite 1850. That car (when it ran) would understeer at ridiculously low speeds and the rear didn’t slide, but hopped. I owned it for 9 months and managed 200 miles (Engine blew, gearbox broke, clutch seized, starter motor was intermittant and it would eat condensors every 30 miles causing the points to weld shut.)
For really bad cars see http://www.barryboys.co.uk/mx/
JC
One personal, the other a bit second hand..
1. SWMBO and I were having a drink in a pub in Hockcliffe (near Dunstable). We were seated at a round table and there was another couple the other side of the table who were nothing to do with us. All four of us watched a pint (mine – full :o) move slowly across the table and fall off the edge…
2. I used to work for Lotus Cars many years ago, and as some of you may be aware, the site was an 8th AF B24 base (389th BG?). Most of the old buildings were used, albeit in a modernised form for manufacturing and design. When we were busy some of the buildings over the road were pressed into service as drawing offices (told you it was a while ago!).
The thing about most of our design engineers at the time is that they were contractors, and the thing about contractors is they (used) to get paid very, very well and would also work every hour they could (and get paid for every hour they did). To see these blokes at their drawing boards at 11pm every night was not uncommon.
One gentleman was working late alone in one of the surrogate drawing offices over the road when someone walked passed him. The comment made to the new arrival was ignored, and the engineer looked up from his work to see a young man in full WW2 flying kit. The young man faded away.
Apparently the contractor never worked alone again!
Wasn’t the chap in the middle of the group photograph in Robbie Coltrane’s Planes Trains and Automobiles programme about Supercharged engines? Had his garage full of DB 60(lots) engines.
Top beastie that. Looks the business.
JC
Focus Convertible is on the cards – should be at a European show soon. XKR’s are getting on a bit now, but still good (and a lot more reliable as well!)
JC
Beat me to it Steve – the Lada Niva is truly appalling. Followed closely by the Riva. Whilst at Lotus (1990) I once drove a Niva from the workshop to the gate, and that was enough for me. I also drove a Niva from my Parents house to the MOT centre – 2 miles. I walked home. My father decided that cheap and cheerful would do – not a good move!
Best that I’ve driven? The latest Jaguar XJR. Stunning. On a more realistic note, the Mondeo TDCi is amazing – cruises at NSL + 30, wheelspins in the wet in 3rd gear and returns 40+ mpg. It might be a boring Ford but I’d have one tomorrow..
After nearly 17 years in the car industry it takes a lot to impress this jaded old cynic 🙂
JC
Historically, the F-16 has to rank quite high. First fly-by-wire jet, and it < snip > historic about the 21 other than it was built in large numbers? same can be said for the Phantom, although an argument could be made for its multi-role capabilities.
Yebbut this thread is for our favourite historic jets 🙂 My list of historically important jets would be different (well mostly).
I just happen to like jets that rearrange internal organs on reheat.
JC
Hi John C,
No offence taken; but this type of resoration isn’t going to use modern materials for parts – the work done is to an originality requirement. Nothing wrong with GRP, but it’s not appropriate on this a/c from this company!
Hence the apology 😀 It’s just that the pointy spinner ruins the look for me! When I win the Lottery I promise to commision a short production run of blunt Hurricane spinners (in the original alloy of course!!!) 😉
JC
Hmmmm.. My favorites are (in no particular order):
EE Lightning
F4 Phantom
F104 Starfighter
Hunter
MiG 21
Oh look – I like really noisy jets 😀
JC
IMHO the blunt spinner is the better looking – the sharp item spoils the lines of the thing.
What airworthyness requirements could there be for a spinner? All it really does is covers up all of the scruffy VP gear and reduces the drag. So long as it stays attached to the aeroplane that’s all that really matters surely… Wouldn’t a GRP item do the job? Given an original, any good fibreglass fabricator would be able to reproduce them. Ok it’s not to the original design but it’s a lower cost option.
As I’m asking questions (again), how were the originals manufactured? They must have been pressed from aluminium, but do they need balancing? Are there high dynamic forces at work in the spinner area?
JC
with apologies to whoever I may have offended by suggesting that restorations can use GRP parts.
Would the fact that we’re talking aircraft with the capability of going supersonic be part of the problem (was the Bucc supersonic?)?
Something could go wrong over Birmingham and the aircraft might end up in Manchester – that’s enough to make any bureaucrat go weak in the bowels. I can see that an old airframe with the capabilities of a Lightning would cause concern to officialdom! The key point is that the South African machines cannot fly over populated areas, and South Africa has a lot of free space unlike us.
It’s clearer now thanks! Although I’d still like to know the official description of a “Complex” aircraft.
JC
Considering a holiday to South Africa.