dark light

edisonone

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 704 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: China to build 3 Aircraft Carriers #2061450
    edisonone
    Participant

    LOL you get goofier and goofier by the second.

    Mr. rickusn,

    Is that how you solve a problems :p? By insulting people, “at will,”
    if you can’t get your way? Hey! I agree that that indeed is one way of
    getting around debates and arguments that one just can’t have control of. I bet
    you must have plenty and plenty of experience in that specialty.

    Mr, rickusn, Let me see some real stuff!!!
    Not insults! And I might give your views and your
    opinions some thought and not before that.

    Man!!! The desperation :p … I wonder who is more
    the goofier one? The one that went over the top for nothing? Or the
    one who was merely stating his own personal opinion?

    I for one would never insult people as
    liberally and as liesurely as you do – NOT EVEN IF I’M LOSING
    IN MY DEBATES AND IN MY ARGUMENTS :p !!!

    .

    in reply to: China to build 3 Aircraft Carriers #2061484
    edisonone
    Participant

    .

    With his status and the respect he commands in the news media?
    I doubt if that’s enough for him to call it a day. I mean rightly or wrongly, if
    what they can do to this once upon a time much reveered fella, Scott Ritters, you can
    bet they can do to anyone and everyone — Dan Rather inclusive.

    Besides, I do not see it as a conspiracy. I see it more
    as part of a ruthless game that people must play in politics
    in order to survive. And, in politics, the best man wins.

    Truthfully, if I was into politics
    and if I was targetted as El Presidente was, I’d use all
    the tricks in the book as well.

    Clairifications: I’m not pro-anyone here.
    Dan Rather is used here merely as an argument because of
    the criticism people here have for Beijing.

    I felt that the singling out of Beijing was unfair to say the least.

    .

    edisonone
    Participant

    Gentlemen,

    Please keep this thread tight & focus with regard to the WS10A engine.

    Please do not deviate from this tight focus by bringing in Indian kaveri
    engine & LCA etc…

    If Indian posters feel the need to discuss their indian engines, Kaveri &
    LCA etc… kindly start a separate thread for it. In fact, that thread
    already exists! Kindly post Kaveri & LCA related matters to that thread.

    Thank You.

    If other posters (especially non-Indians) can contribute more to this
    important news re: WS10A final certification, please do so. We are
    all ears.

    This final certification of WS10A engine is a momentous milestone for the
    balance of Airpower in Asia & beyond. As such, please do not deviate
    from this core subject re: WS10A engine & its further developments.

    [ core subject – no pun intended ! ]

    But, is that even remotely possible :p ?
    That’s like asking Sylvester the purddy cat to not keep snapping at
    Tweddy the harmless little chicadee :p .

    .

    .

    in reply to: China to build 3 Aircraft Carriers #2061498
    edisonone
    Participant

    So, according to your position, there is so such thing as the United States of America… just a “renegade provence of England”!

    Well… I must admit… You indeed are putting
    me into a bit of delemma here. A difficult situation even.
    Now what shall I do or how shall I handle this :p.

    Languages and customs aside, the Chinese is not as notorious of a species
    because, if they are, the whole of eastern Europe would’ve qualify a speciment you had
    tried to utilized in your argument (based on Yuan China and other eras of China’s past) . But,
    they have never ever harboured anything remotely like that in their minds.

    So don’t even try that one on me because it won’t work.

    Think: Of all Islands in the world, why do you suppose the Chinese
    nationalist at the time were able to liesurely and comfortably been able to
    RETREAT TO” and not known as “INVADE” the Island, tanks and all, and were permitted to fly the
    nationalist flag there? WHY? That’s because it is Chinese domain and…

    United States, now what is it? A province of England or what???

    Apples are apples and oranges are oranges. You are trying much much
    too hard here and you are swerving totally off course. Chinese Islands is not
    the United States — Chinese Islands are simply that — Chinese Islands!

    .

    in reply to: China to build 3 Aircraft Carriers #2061500
    edisonone
    Participant

    The only ignorant person here is you.

    My my… How disgruntled can people get when they
    can’t have things their way… I mean it’s almost a spoiled and crancky
    brat, a baby, crying over milk or crying for attention…

    You can prove your not by answering my questions.

    But I do answers questions. However, I tend to do it my way… with honesty
    and reasoning and not with outragous demands, bitchings, or curses. But, I will have to admit —
    not everyone in this world is bliss with the gift of being able to reason.

    LOL “anchor for life” What world do you live in?

    I mean do you really and seriously believe that Rathers took early retirement :p ?
    If so, then you are even much more naive than I thought. Mr. Rove is a smart cooky
    and smart cookies have a tendency of hatching smart tricks. Comprended?

    Do you realize people in America with his type of money(and many with much less) often begin retiring in their mid 50’s? And almost everyone is retired by the age of 65.

    Have you ever heard of Barb Barker the fella that hosts that day time
    game show “The Price Is Right??? What do you think his worth is? And, is he stupid
    or what? I mean the guy can hardly stand up anymore but, last I clicked the TV screen, he is
    still as canniving as ever towards those sexy Ladies of “The Price Is Right” :p…

    Or, let’s simply put it this way… Celebrities,
    be they actors, TV hosts, news anchors, whatever — they don’t die — like
    soldiers – they too slowly slowy fades away …

    .

    in reply to: China to build 3 Aircraft Carriers #2061501
    edisonone
    Participant

    [THREADJACK]
    Last time I was in the queue at Narita immigration I was surrounded by Chinese tourists. Obvious that there were two types (different clothes, accessories, mannerisms, faces – as easy as spotting northern mainlanders in Hong Kong, which I found in the mid-90s was very easy indeed). Surreptitious peeks at passports held in hands revealed the secret – mainlanders & Taiwanese.
    [/THREADJACK]

    Reference: Passports

    Strangely enough: aren’t both of them :p Chinese passports :p ?

    And alternatively, while there might be distinct taste to the politics of it,
    a different twist even, isn’t it true however that the symbolizms of the high noon sun
    in the colors of blue and white in a field of Chinese red exactly the very same field of Chinese red
    that proudly and enthusiastically sports the five bright and shinny stars?

    “In one of the crossings between the US and Canada (Peace Arch I think),
    engraved “PROUDLY” in stone is this verse: “Siblings of The Same Motherhood” (correct
    me if not exactly how it goes people). God!!! How I envy the awesome meanings those words
    convey… Now, where is this very same energy and this enthusiasm?”

    I’m sad… I’m sad and I feel sorry for all those slow-ones in us!!!
    Because, we have them too in Canuckland. They call themselves Block Qebecors. And, the
    late Pier Elliot Trudeau said it best with the fingers he gave them
    .

    .

    in reply to: China to build 3 Aircraft Carriers #2061548
    edisonone
    Participant

    If your trying to say that there has been a change
    of government in China and that it is no longer a Communist government
    you will have to supply me with factual documentation.

    I’d like to see it as “the coming to the ages” when it’s to do with the
    present system and not an as outright change of government as you had quoted.
    Socialism with a uinque and distinct characteristic, shall we say — a characteristic where
    Dan Rathers gets to anchor for life maybe instead of being disgraced ???

    Dan Rather will be 75 years old this year and retired a year ago.

    You’ve got to be kiddin’??? Or else – you must be equally as ignorant
    as the other guy. He (Rathers) got canned for the air national guard thingy
    and, likely for having interviewed Heussein the dictator and for showing empathy
    for the guy. The Hanoi Jane syndrome… Oh you know what I mean!!!

    .

    in reply to: China to build 3 Aircraft Carriers #2061554
    edisonone
    Participant

    Hi kyli

    You’re making the same mistake as Golden. I wasn’t talking about people, I was coming from a legal position over how countries as a whole accept Taiwanese passports as official documents.

    The legal position is that Taiwan writes, reads, speaks, and listens in
    Chinese, cuisines in Chinese, “THINKS CHINESE”, sings songs and lyerics in Chinese, operas in Chinese,
    fools around the Chinese way, and plays mahjong just like the Chinese…

    Now, can you wash all of that clean???

    .

    in reply to: China to build 3 Aircraft Carriers #2061557
    edisonone
    Participant

    That sounds like the view the Nazis took over nationality.

    Nazis:

    And, what do you have against the Nazis???

    I mean what do you know about the Nazis? Honestly, I wouldn’t go the
    route because, like you, I don’t have any first hand knowledge whatsoever about them,
    with the exception of what I had heard, read, or was told about them.

    Matter of factly, if the Nazis are nationalist fanatics, they are still no
    match for that of Imperial Japan so why not use Japan as an example instead? Why Germany?
    I mean Japan would’ve make it much easier for people to relate here .

    .

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 9 #2580987
    edisonone
    Participant

    Why FC-1 AND J-10? Why not just have one or the other?

    FC-1:

    “An item specifically designed and developed with
    the export market in mind maybe. Just like that of the F-5s,
    the F-20 Tigersharks, the MiG-21/J-7’s, etc., etc.?”

    J-10:

    Multirole air superiority fighter whose object is to beef up the
    Chinese Airforce and to bring it to par with the latest of the F-14’s, 15’s, 16’s,
    and the F-18’s of the world — even the EF-2000’s, maybe?

    I read somewhere (US Naval Inteligence I think) that that’s the primary
    reason for the US to develope the “Super Hornet”, even “the F-22”. It’s because they’re suspicious
    the J-10 might prove a formidable competitor to those in the first list.

    But, I didn’t said that However. Naval Inteligence did.

    .

    in reply to: China to build 3 Aircraft Carriers #2061710
    edisonone
    Participant

    You tell me? LOL You seem to know evereything else.

    But if you dont think the communist party is still governing China you may need to check your glasses.

    But I dont expect it. LOL

    Happy Crash LOL

    Unfortunately Ive never made it to China. But know some who have and recently. They seem to think your way off out in left field somewhere.

    One word: Obssesion. And a full
    40 footer container load of it. And it’s gonna take you
    a while to get it fully unloaded I see.

    Do you know something else? Me and a bunch of Gringos (term used
    in full respect of course) was grilling the river guide and the Captain about the
    politics of the PRC, and openly, freely and liberally, the shiphands, guide inclusive were making
    open statements, criticisms even, about the faults, the mistakes, the stupidities
    of Mao and not a gesture of fear or concern in their body language.

    Now, try that with Bush :p and see if maybe you might not join
    Dan Rathers in the unemployment line up :p . I have every respect for Bush too cousre
    so don’t get me wrong. I even asked my people to vote for him.

    .

    in reply to: China to build 3 Aircraft Carriers #2061713
    edisonone
    Participant

    Taiwan citizen eh! A country recoqnized by only 20 mostly poor central american states .
    For your information 1 million Taiwanese choose to live and work in mainland China and Your separatist hero is practicaly lame duck goverment that cannot even passed a budget for 2 years now!
    That goverment that was soundly beaten in the last election!

    Why the need to spell it out? It’s written all
    over him. And his supporter? Try the word Nihonguojin. We call
    them rats and snakes of the same nesting.

    .

    in reply to: China to build 3 Aircraft Carriers #2061722
    edisonone
    Participant

    Nationality is a factor of choice. I could be born in China, and emigrate to Mexico, take out Mexican citizenship and then I am a Mexican of Chinese descent.

    If so, then it’s your choice and your choice only to recognize or
    to identify yourself as a Senor Fox. It in no way entitles you the legal rights to claim that
    the whole of the southern half of America have the rights to break loose from the union simply
    because Hisbanic America is uniquely distinct from Anglo America.

    .

    in reply to: Pakistan AF News and Discussions 2006 #2582244
    edisonone
    Participant
    in reply to: China to build 3 Aircraft Carriers #2061757
    edisonone
    Participant

    China is still run by the communist elite. Make no mistake.

    I’m definitely not anti-west beacuse I am western by
    definition of habitat; but, :p if China is run by communist elites :p ; then, just
    for the fun of it, and as a joke to lighten this dreary day: What elite (or what dictatorship)
    then run one of the world’s most powerfull country :p ???

    Coloured glasses… It impedes one’s vision.
    You really need to take it off if you really want to know where
    you’re coming from & where you are going.

    .

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 704 total)