dark light

edisonone

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 704 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chinese developed J11 and Su-35 #2577285
    edisonone
    Participant

    China don have the need to offer their best radar cos they r financially well-off.I talking abt avionics only why engine and other crap come out? China is secret abt all its abilities but from all Russia trying to offer China and all being rejected .I can’t help feeling abt the abilities of Russian aivonics! The fact Russia now r more willing to offer advance stuff to China but still get nothing out of it even convinces me more!

    China is not going to rely primarily on Russian
    concepts because Russian goods are shared with everyone
    and that won’t do China any deeds or benefits.

    For erxamples: What good will it do if Hanoi knows
    exactly where China’s Su’s are and China visa versa? She has to
    come up with solutions to the problems she faces and she is coming up
    with solutions to the problems that is confronting her.

    :p Another example: What good will it do
    for China if for examples her arch rival “Pakistan” can
    have exactly what she has been offered? :p

    I don’t think China is that stupid. But, if it’s something intended
    for her to start the ball bouncing, Yes! it’s a necessary evil. But indefinitely,
    as a dependence? No way Jose!!! And, she is not going to wait for the year 3000 or an OK
    from anyone before she starts fiddling with her own ideas either.

    .

    in reply to: Chinese developed J11 and Su-35 #2577315
    edisonone
    Participant

    Get real, china dosnt have an AESA fighter radar that is anywhere near ready as opposed to Russia planning to flight test the ZHuk-A next year. No chinese aircraft has flown with Indigenous TVC, and the J-10 looks as if it will never get an indigenous engine.

    Even if true, that does not mean that they
    are not working behind closed doors and that they have a tendency
    of shocking and surprising every one of us.

    .

    in reply to: Chinese developed J11 and Su-35 #2577336
    edisonone
    Participant

    .

    With all due respects to the maturing Chinese industry.. I would still say that it’s behind the Russians even in the avionics field..

    behind the Russians even in the avionics:

    With respect to avionics: Somehow, I think the Chinese are charting
    a course that is distinct and totally different from that of which the Russians have
    incorporated into their export items because, these Russian items are designed more specifically
    to deal with regional problems and not to take care of global threats.

    Facts: Even here, they would use the latest
    of F-16s — not the MiGs or Suhkoi — as reference because Russian items
    and avionics is not what they must deal with.

    http://www.china.org.cn/english/scitech/159743.htm

    For argument sakes: Who knows if an Imperial Japan of a kind might
    not again make a debut in this world and that the shadows of the Nanjing
    massacres which is likely still fresh in the memories of many a Chinese might not in
    fact be looming ominously and dangerously over the horizon again?

    .

    in reply to: Faked apollo Mission to Moon? #2577878
    edisonone
    Participant

    .

    How’s about dimensional space? Does any one buy that one?

    Hard to write off anything these days given how “black
    matters
    and blackholes and such” has become the norms of every
    day science. Therefore, I am willing to bet that the hypothesis of wormholes,
    warps speeds, etc., may in fact not be that far fetched.

    I mean where does the universe begin and where does it end? Or, if
    there is an edge to the universe as some suggests, where does that begin and where
    does it end and so on and so forth? Or, if as theory goes that the universe is still expanding
    and that it will collapse and fall back on itself, where to from there?

    In other words I too am one who is open to the ideas
    of “Inteligent Design” because, life is and will always be a
    mystery that none of us will ever find a definite answer….

    Who knows if there might not be another state of existence (of a none
    biological or even of a visible state and which might thrive on natural sources of energy
    alone) in another dimension of time and space we yet can comprehend???

    .

    in reply to: Canada has built a new jet #2578151
    edisonone
    Participant

    .

    Man!!! Looks like
    everyone is after the defense
    needs marketplace…

    Here’s Korea’s counterpart to the export oriented market…
    http://bbs13.xilu.com/cgi-bin/bbs/view?forum=zgyb&message=149496
    How crowded!!! Money, I guess, is indeed the root to all evils…

    Anyway, Bravo http://www.pch.gc.ca/images/flag.gif Canada! http://www.pch.gc.ca/images/flag.gif
    They should call it the Avro Arrow-II instead however.
    Pretty sleek looking too I might add…

    .

    in reply to: Faked apollo Mission to Moon? #2578268
    edisonone
    Participant

    .

    Nothing against this guy but, BOY OH BOY!!!

    He’s going to get his **** kicked in by his
    neighbour to the north and he’s going to drag this hard fought for
    Sino-US relations down the drain with him…

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4760982.stm

    Man!!! Those Billions of dollars of annual
    trade surplus…. Is it worth trading it in for this guy’s
    business? Hope Beijing is not as stupid…

    The Chinese, my opinion, should stay clear off of a this guy. He’s BIG TROUBLE
    and he’s A DEATH WISH… He’s also Uncle Sam’s very own backyard so let Uncle Sam tilt it
    any which way he pleases. The Chinese, my opinion, shouldn’t even go near it.

    Just a silly little opinion…

    .

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 9 #2578311
    edisonone
    Participant

    Got this from CDF.

    China-made “UFO” to debut
    Vertical maneuver, suspension in air and unmanned flight, the words used to describe “UFOs” in science fiction films, will become true in reality. News from the School of Earth and Space Sciences of Beijing University says a virtual system of stratospheric solar aerospace flight system has been developed with Chinese independent IPR and is applying for a national patent.

    The system looks like a pentacle and can maneuver automatically in the air.

    According to Prof. Yan Lei with the School, the system is powered by solar cell. It adopts bearingless motor propeller to realize silent flight, vertical maneuver, long-time suspension in air. It can realize self-control and ground control. Capable of carry arms, it can attack and defend itself.

    By People’s Daily Online

    China-made “UFO” to debut:

    Item also posted in the fake moon landing thread a day previous because of
    concerns people here might bitch about it over the fact that it has more to do with
    “Weird Flying Objects ( :p WFO :p) rather than UFOs”. A detailed report on this item via one of
    the Chinese News sites (China.org English) was also attached for reference.

    Regardless, this thing has been around the net for more
    than 5 days (practically in every Chinese site known to man). Therefore,
    I will have to say here that CDF is starting to show its age.

    Truthfully, CDF is rather behind the times these days. because
    everything that they’ve stated claims to is usually and already all over the web. But,
    typically and as always — it too is a site dominated by Warlords and they too will probably claim full
    credit for this one and bitch at anyone and everyone who posts it.

    Back to this item:

    Depending on the substrates (material or coating) used, I suspect that this one
    would make for a handy highly stealthy high altitude U-2 type inteligence gathering apparatus
    and given the politics in the Asian front as of late, this may be indispensable.

    Similarities and inspirational sources???
    http://www.wforum.com/wmf/posts/1115233895.html
    UAVs of various gists and configurations…

    Also, could it be solar powered? Just curious.

    Other Interests:

    At the very least, these guys gets
    to fiddle around with their imaginations anyhow if
    nothing else. The Lucky Duckies!!!

    http://tuku.military.china.com/military/html/2006-03-01/1020487_185341551.htm
    http://tuku.military.china.com/military/html/2006-03-01/1020487_185340869.htm

    FBC-1/JH-7 as it’s portrayed in ’87:
    http://tuku.military.china.com/military/html/2006-02-21/26369.htm

    http://military.china.com/zh_cn/bbs/11018441/20060301/13132583_2.html

    And, FBC-1/JH-7A in its present configuration.
    http://tuku.military.china.com/military/html/2006-02-20/26328.htm

    Stark difference isn’t it?

    Anyway, I thought I share it with the rest of you. And I don’t
    know about you guys, but I found it interesting anyhow that the project goes way back — around
    about the time Rolls Royce made its debut in China I suspect.

    .

    in reply to: Pakistan AF News and Discussions 2006 #2578851
    edisonone
    Participant

    .

    Grumman’s Super-7:

    Actually, I believe what truly killed the Super-7 programme was
    American red tape and TAM probably provided Washington with the last minute excuse
    to void whatever contract they might have inked
    with China.

    China had to deal with Brezhnev and his MiG-23s, 25s, and 27 and
    such at the time and the Super-7, proabably, was a kind of a barter for which
    China agreed to help the US take out the Soviets out in Afganistan.

    But, as always, China probably insists on the ins and
    outs of what makes the Super-7 tick and the US probably got smart
    in the very last moment and didn’t want to share it.

    This angle: sharp and cool…

    http://images.qianlong.com/mmsource/images/2006/02/26/jstyj020625_07.jpg

    Think it’s been posted before but not sure.

    .

    in reply to: Pakistan AF News and Discussions 2006 #2579178
    edisonone
    Participant

    I’m sure you are more than welcome to apply but, that pay check…
    http://english1.people.com.cn/200602/14/eng20060214_242564.html
    that puts that bread and butter on the dinning table? Well… I dunno!!!

    in reply to: Pakistan AF News and Discussions 2006 #2579191
    edisonone
    Participant

    Even J-10 won’t cost $40 million.

    lol, the 3 million engine will be replaced by the 1 million WS-13A once the export season starts. Trust me, FC-1 can be downgraded. They can take prototype 01 and remove even FBW redundancy, put a domestic engine on it, export even more downgraded SD-10 and PL-9C. CAC has often said that J-7MF can be just as capable as FC-1. You can obviously downgrade J-7MF to less capable J-7. That should tell you how far FC-1 can be downgraded.

    And of course JF-17 will be PAF’s frontline aircraft. Look at what PAF has right now? Is it really that surprising?

    Again, my two cents:

    I suspect the J-10 will command a price tag of somewhere around
    10 million; maybe 15 million for the top of the line series (one’s with the
    works in it); with the former (Basic models) geared more towards the African Market.
    Providing of course it indeed will be introduced as an export item.

    FC-1’s can most likely be had for between 5 million to 8 million tops. If they
    charge more than that, it would be a toughy fo her to penetrate the world market
    if not impossible, given what can be had from the west for a similar price.

    Besides, if i’m wrong about this, a simple J-7 sells for only 3 million.
    Adding that softwares can be had for dirt cheap in China, they can put
    the FC-1 in the market for just a wee above the price tag they have on the best
    of their J-7s making the FC-1 accessable to anyone and everyone.

    “Facts: I can pick up a DVD machine at a mere 24 dollars CDN and
    it does the same job and does it just as good. I doubt however if I can even come
    close to that if manufactured by Phillips or if by Sony or whatever.”

    My suspicion is that Pakistan will be the primary marketing agent for the
    FC-1 while China the principle source of the manufacturing (export items). Therefore
    no free lunch there for Pakistan. She will have a lots of cold calling to do. She have better
    access to the mideastern market than China and can make a killing there.

    Hey! That’s why it’s a partnership deal.

    .

    in reply to: China to build 3 Aircraft Carriers #2061330
    edisonone
    Participant

    Okay, continuing to bite my tongue. Further illustrations of the pointlessness of this. Get

    Yes, get over it indeed… We need to get
    over the “tinted glasses people have of others”… It has to start
    somewhere and where better than rickusn :p …

    .

    in reply to: China to build 3 Aircraft Carriers #2061333
    edisonone
    Participant

    Actually Edisonone you are the one who started with the gratutitous insults.

    Evidence?! Evidence please?! Please please please :p ?!!!

    Anyway, by shufflling “that blame card around” won’t help you
    salvage the damage you’ve already done to yourself and to your charactor :p . After all,
    you were the one that came out with THAT SILLINESS. Not me!

    (Maybe this will serve as a learning experience to one and
    all that insults and uncool languages is not the way to go because, if
    used indiscriminately – silly outburses can back fire on you.)

    While at the same time making outlandish false statements .

    Again, evidence please! Or, at the very least clairifications as
    to the term, or the word, “outlandish” and what you mean by that. I mean
    what did I say which was so “outlandish” that it would cause people to resorts
    to “violence almost” to try and get their messages across :p ???

    I’m baffled! I’m scratching me head here… I’m at a lost for words… :p…

    When asked for any factual
    documentation to back those statements up your the
    one who got angry and still are.

    Wow!!! I got angry because you asked for facts?
    How did you ever arrived at such a notion? I mean in what way did I
    blow my cool so to speak? Or, could it maybe simply be that I wasn’t speaking your
    language and you weren’t too pleased with it?

    Facts: Even SOC acknowledged the conspiracy theory (Yes! I said
    acknowledged. I didn’t say he was in agreement with it. And yes, it was
    but only a theory and theories gets debated and not taken up with bitterness.)

    and he added his two cents to it. He sure as the heck didn’t revert to
    insults and harsh languages as you did to try to get his point across.

    Now that is the difference between a person who commands
    respect (SOC’s way) and someone who don’t even know what he or she
    is doing (Oh well… You know what I’m refering here I’m sure).

    I mean honestly, have you even just for once mentioned that there indeed
    is a conspiracy theory around and that I wasn’t the one that created it? No! Not even
    once. All I got was was harsh words packed with bitterness and rejection.

    The very bottom line and please admit it: It’s only alright for
    you to throw all kinds of a acusation Beijing’s way. But, if it’s the other way around,
    it’s like the end of the world to you isn’t it? Now why is that
    ?

    .

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 9 #2579370
    edisonone
    Participant

    Rumor or Official?

    My 2 cents: A one child policy? Here??? Not likely! :p .

    I mean I would have thought that the Chinese would have been way
    smarter than to built only one prototype. But, I guess that’s what it amounts to if they
    won’t come out personally to let us all know that they are already fiddling with the other one somewhere else.
    After all, what can one expect from :p TAM ChiCom dictators, RIGHT? :p

    If they are willing and prepared to share it with the world, then, characteristically and customarily,
    they are usually pretty sure that it won’t make a fool of themselves or that it would cause them to lose face. Meanings
    it’s likely already proven. That child have to be a straight A or they won’t show it to the world.

    Call it shared and natural inborn intuition if you will.

    .

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 9 #2579410
    edisonone
    Participant

    that prototype is not necessarily 04, it’s could be another prototype that is getting built right now to 04 standard.

    Usually, don’t they make more than just one prototype? I mean with the
    “04” being a totally distinct and different aircraft (almost), wouldn’t they needs to have at
    least one for static & structural testing and another for flight evauation.

    http://military.china.com/zh_cn/bbs/11018441/20060227/13125596.html

    .

    in reply to: China to build 3 Aircraft Carriers #2061416
    edisonone
    Participant

    This still has nothing to do with Chinese carriers people. Perhaps a little moderator action called for. Lock the thread for a few days and let it settle. The whole China/Taiwan thing has been done more time than I care to remember, no one will be changing their opinions based on what goes on here.

    Daniel

    Blame it on losers (shameless and inconsiderate Islanders)
    who wanted their idiotic plights be heard — in the international arena (AFM) :p
    instead of doing it like grown ups at their very own back yards…

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 704 total)