China don have the need to offer their best radar cos they r financially well-off.I talking abt avionics only why engine and other crap come out? China is secret abt all its abilities but from all Russia trying to offer China and all being rejected .I can’t help feeling abt the abilities of Russian aivonics! The fact Russia now r more willing to offer advance stuff to China but still get nothing out of it even convinces me more!
China is not going to rely primarily on Russian
concepts because Russian goods are shared with everyone
and that won’t do China any deeds or benefits.
For erxamples: What good will it do if Hanoi knows
exactly where China’s Su’s are and China visa versa? She has to
come up with solutions to the problems she faces and she is coming up
with solutions to the problems that is confronting her.
:p Another example: What good will it do
for China if for examples her arch rival “Pakistan” can
have exactly what she has been offered? :p
I don’t think China is that stupid. But, if it’s something intended
for her to start the ball bouncing, Yes! it’s a necessary evil. But indefinitely,
as a dependence? No way Jose!!! And, she is not going to wait for the year 3000 or an OK
from anyone before she starts fiddling with her own ideas either.
.
Get real, china dosnt have an AESA fighter radar that is anywhere near ready as opposed to Russia planning to flight test the ZHuk-A next year. No chinese aircraft has flown with Indigenous TVC, and the J-10 looks as if it will never get an indigenous engine.
Even if true, that does not mean that they
are not working behind closed doors and that they have a tendency
of shocking and surprising every one of us.
.
.
With all due respects to the maturing Chinese industry.. I would still say that it’s behind the Russians even in the avionics field..
behind the Russians even in the avionics:
With respect to avionics: Somehow, I think the Chinese are charting
a course that is distinct and totally different from that of which the Russians have
incorporated into their export items because, these Russian items are designed more specifically
to deal with regional problems and not to take care of global threats.
Facts: Even here, they would use the latest
of F-16s — not the MiGs or Suhkoi — as reference because Russian items
and avionics is not what they must deal with.
http://www.china.org.cn/english/scitech/159743.htm
For argument sakes: Who knows if an Imperial Japan of a kind might
not again make a debut in this world and that the shadows of the Nanjing
massacres which is likely still fresh in the memories of many a Chinese might not in
fact be looming ominously and dangerously over the horizon again?
.
.
How’s about dimensional space? Does any one buy that one?
Hard to write off anything these days given how “black
matters and blackholes and such” has become the norms of every
day science. Therefore, I am willing to bet that the hypothesis of wormholes,
warps speeds, etc., may in fact not be that far fetched.
I mean where does the universe begin and where does it end? Or, if
there is an edge to the universe as some suggests, where does that begin and where
does it end and so on and so forth? Or, if as theory goes that the universe is still expanding
and that it will collapse and fall back on itself, where to from there?
In other words I too am one who is open to the ideas
of “Inteligent Design” because, life is and will always be a
mystery that none of us will ever find a definite answer….
Who knows if there might not be another state of existence (of a none
biological or even of a visible state and which might thrive on natural sources of energy
alone) in another dimension of time and space we yet can comprehend???
.
.
Man!!! Looks like
everyone is after the defense
needs marketplace…
Here’s Korea’s counterpart to the export oriented market…
http://bbs13.xilu.com/cgi-bin/bbs/view?forum=zgyb&message=149496
How crowded!!! Money, I guess, is indeed the root to all evils…
Anyway, Bravo
Canada! 
They should call it the Avro Arrow-II instead however.
Pretty sleek looking too I might add…
.
.
Nothing against this guy but, BOY OH BOY!!!
He’s going to get his **** kicked in by his
neighbour to the north and he’s going to drag this hard fought for
Sino-US relations down the drain with him…
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4760982.stm
Man!!! Those Billions of dollars of annual
trade surplus…. Is it worth trading it in for this guy’s
business? Hope Beijing is not as stupid…
The Chinese, my opinion, should stay clear off of a this guy. He’s BIG TROUBLE
and he’s A DEATH WISH… He’s also Uncle Sam’s very own backyard so let Uncle Sam tilt it
any which way he pleases. The Chinese, my opinion, shouldn’t even go near it.
Just a silly little opinion…
.
Got this from CDF.
China-made “UFO” to debut
Vertical maneuver, suspension in air and unmanned flight, the words used to describe “UFOs” in science fiction films, will become true in reality. News from the School of Earth and Space Sciences of Beijing University says a virtual system of stratospheric solar aerospace flight system has been developed with Chinese independent IPR and is applying for a national patent.The system looks like a pentacle and can maneuver automatically in the air.
According to Prof. Yan Lei with the School, the system is powered by solar cell. It adopts bearingless motor propeller to realize silent flight, vertical maneuver, long-time suspension in air. It can realize self-control and ground control. Capable of carry arms, it can attack and defend itself.
By People’s Daily Online
China-made “UFO” to debut:
Item also posted in the fake moon landing thread a day previous because of
concerns people here might bitch about it over the fact that it has more to do with
“Weird Flying Objects ( :p WFO :p) rather than UFOs”. A detailed report on this item via one of
the Chinese News sites (China.org English) was also attached for reference.
Regardless, this thing has been around the net for more
than 5 days (practically in every Chinese site known to man). Therefore,
I will have to say here that CDF is starting to show its age.
Truthfully, CDF is rather behind the times these days. because
everything that they’ve stated claims to is usually and already all over the web. But,
typically and as always — it too is a site dominated by Warlords and they too will probably claim full
credit for this one and bitch at anyone and everyone who posts it.
Back to this item:
Depending on the substrates (material or coating) used, I suspect that this one
would make for a handy highly stealthy high altitude U-2 type inteligence gathering apparatus
and given the politics in the Asian front as of late, this may be indispensable.
Similarities and inspirational sources???
http://www.wforum.com/wmf/posts/1115233895.html
UAVs of various gists and configurations…
Also, could it be solar powered? Just curious.
Other Interests:
At the very least, these guys gets
to fiddle around with their imaginations anyhow if
nothing else. The Lucky Duckies!!!
http://tuku.military.china.com/military/html/2006-03-01/1020487_185341551.htm
http://tuku.military.china.com/military/html/2006-03-01/1020487_185340869.htm
FBC-1/JH-7 as it’s portrayed in ’87:
http://tuku.military.china.com/military/html/2006-02-21/26369.htm
http://military.china.com/zh_cn/bbs/11018441/20060301/13132583_2.html
And, FBC-1/JH-7A in its present configuration.
http://tuku.military.china.com/military/html/2006-02-20/26328.htm
Stark difference isn’t it?
Anyway, I thought I share it with the rest of you. And I don’t
know about you guys, but I found it interesting anyhow that the project goes way back — around
about the time Rolls Royce made its debut in China I suspect.
.
.
Grumman’s Super-7:
Actually, I believe what truly killed the Super-7 programme was
American red tape and “TAM“ probably provided Washington with the last minute excuse
to void whatever contract they might have inked with China.
China had to deal with Brezhnev and his MiG-23s, 25s, and 27 and
such at the time and the Super-7, proabably, was a kind of a barter for which
China agreed to help the US take out the Soviets out in Afganistan.
But, as always, China probably insists on the ins and
outs of what makes the Super-7 tick and the US probably got smart
in the very last moment and didn’t want to share it.
This angle: sharp and cool…

Think it’s been posted before but not sure.
.
I’m sure you are more than welcome to apply but, that pay check…
http://english1.people.com.cn/200602/14/eng20060214_242564.html
that puts that bread and butter on the dinning table? Well… I dunno!!!
Even J-10 won’t cost $40 million.
lol, the 3 million engine will be replaced by the 1 million WS-13A once the export season starts. Trust me, FC-1 can be downgraded. They can take prototype 01 and remove even FBW redundancy, put a domestic engine on it, export even more downgraded SD-10 and PL-9C. CAC has often said that J-7MF can be just as capable as FC-1. You can obviously downgrade J-7MF to less capable J-7. That should tell you how far FC-1 can be downgraded.
And of course JF-17 will be PAF’s frontline aircraft. Look at what PAF has right now? Is it really that surprising?
Again, my two cents:
I suspect the J-10 will command a price tag of somewhere around
10 million; maybe 15 million for the top of the line series (one’s with the
works in it); with the former (Basic models) geared more towards the African Market.
Providing of course it indeed will be introduced as an export item.
FC-1’s can most likely be had for between 5 million to 8 million tops. If they
charge more than that, it would be a toughy fo her to penetrate the world market
if not impossible, given what can be had from the west for a similar price.
Besides, if i’m wrong about this, a simple J-7 sells for only 3 million.
Adding that softwares can be had for dirt cheap in China, they can put
the FC-1 in the market for just a wee above the price tag they have on the best
of their J-7s making the FC-1 accessable to anyone and everyone.
“Facts: I can pick up a DVD machine at a mere 24 dollars CDN and
it does the same job and does it just as good. I doubt however if I can even come
close to that if manufactured by Phillips or if by Sony or whatever.”
My suspicion is that Pakistan will be the primary marketing agent for the
FC-1 while China the principle source of the manufacturing (export items). Therefore
no free lunch there for Pakistan. She will have a lots of cold calling to do. She have better
access to the mideastern market than China and can make a killing there.
Hey! That’s why it’s a partnership deal.
.
Okay, continuing to bite my tongue. Further illustrations of the pointlessness of this. Get
Yes, get over it indeed… We need to get
over the “tinted glasses people have of others”… It has to start
somewhere and where better than rickusn :p …
.
Actually Edisonone you are the one who started with the gratutitous insults.
Evidence?! Evidence please?! Please please please :p ?!!!
Anyway, by shufflling “that blame card around” won’t help you
salvage the damage you’ve already done to yourself and to your charactor :p . After all,
you were the one that came out with THAT SILLINESS. Not me!
(Maybe this will serve as a learning experience to one and
all that insults and uncool languages is not the way to go because, if
used indiscriminately – silly outburses can back fire on you.)
While at the same time making outlandish false statements .
Again, evidence please! Or, at the very least clairifications as
to the term, or the word, “outlandish” and what you mean by that. I mean
what did I say which was so “outlandish” that it would cause people to resorts
to “violence almost” to try and get their messages across :p ???
I’m baffled! I’m scratching me head here… I’m at a lost for words… :p…
When asked for any factual
documentation to back those statements up your the
one who got angry and still are.
Wow!!! I got angry because you asked for facts?
How did you ever arrived at such a notion? I mean in what way did I
blow my cool so to speak? Or, could it maybe simply be that I wasn’t speaking your
language and you weren’t too pleased with it?
Facts: Even SOC acknowledged the conspiracy theory (Yes! I said
acknowledged. I didn’t say he was in agreement with it. And yes, it was
but only a theory and theories gets debated and not taken up with bitterness.)
and he added his two cents to it. He sure as the heck didn’t revert to
insults and harsh languages as you did to try to get his point across.
Now that is the difference between a person who commands
respect (SOC’s way) and someone who don’t even know what he or she
is doing (Oh well… You know what I’m refering here I’m sure).
I mean honestly, have you even just for once mentioned that there indeed
is a conspiracy theory around and that I wasn’t the one that created it? No! Not even
once. All I got was was harsh words packed with bitterness and rejection.
The very bottom line and please admit it: It’s only alright for
you to throw all kinds of a acusation Beijing’s way. But, if it’s the other way around,
it’s like the end of the world to you isn’t it? Now why is that?
.
Rumor or Official?
My 2 cents: A one child policy? Here??? Not likely! :p .
I mean I would have thought that the Chinese would have been way
smarter than to built only one prototype. But, I guess that’s what it amounts to if they
won’t come out personally to let us all know that they are already fiddling with the other one somewhere else.
After all, what can one expect from :p TAM ChiCom dictators, RIGHT? :p
If they are willing and prepared to share it with the world, then, characteristically and customarily,
they are usually pretty sure that it won’t make a fool of themselves or that it would cause them to lose face. Meanings
it’s likely already proven. That child have to be a straight A or they won’t show it to the world.
Call it shared and natural inborn intuition if you will.
.
that prototype is not necessarily 04, it’s could be another prototype that is getting built right now to 04 standard.
Usually, don’t they make more than just one prototype? I mean with the
“04” being a totally distinct and different aircraft (almost), wouldn’t they needs to have at
least one for static & structural testing and another for flight evauation.
http://military.china.com/zh_cn/bbs/11018441/20060227/13125596.html
.
This still has nothing to do with Chinese carriers people. Perhaps a little moderator action called for. Lock the thread for a few days and let it settle. The whole China/Taiwan thing has been done more time than I care to remember, no one will be changing their opinions based on what goes on here.
Daniel
Blame it on losers (shameless and inconsiderate Islanders)
who wanted their idiotic plights be heard — in the international arena (AFM) :p
instead of doing it like grown ups at their very own back yards…