dark light

edisonone

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 704 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • edisonone
    Participant

    Of course it’s a fake.

    Haley posted it.

    In any case, something like that is not carrier based…especially when China doesn’t even have an operational fixed-wing carrier.

    😀 Well…

    Fake or no fake, it’s definitely no deemed-IDF
    pieced together with 100% imported parts shipped from across the Pacific
    Ocean and named the mighty FCK whatever!

    How fake might that one be I wonder????

    😀

    in reply to: More about Chinese Tu-22Ms #2667271
    edisonone
    Participant

    I think the Chinese would be buying the Tu-22M5 for Anti-Shipping reasons, not just for conventional land attack, because they already have a lot of platforms that can strike Taiwan. What they need is someting like the Kh-32 or whatever and a good platform to carry it.

    My 2 cents:

    IMHO, the Chinese are not concerned with or have any intentions
    whatsoever about Taiwan, unless of course the Island uses force to break from
    its hereditary Chinese connections
    and declares nationhood.

    The Chinese platforms, be it of Tu-22s, sub forces, balistic missile batteries, whatever,
    are therefore not there to threaten the Taiwanese public. IMHO, they are platforms placed
    stragetically in the Taiwan Straight to keep watch over foreign forces who may decide
    to indiscriminatedly flex its muscles simply because they have muscles to spare.

    Japan and Vietnam are such fine examples, historically of course ;)…

    in reply to: More about Chinese Tu-22Ms #2667534
    edisonone
    Participant

    I would agree with Vympel. Hong Kong rags tend to be full of crap.

    My philosophy:

    “Where there’s smoke there’s fire.”

    The question now is: Is it a straight Russian import?
    Or, is this an indiginous Chinese development as rumored in Chinese
    presses
    and web sites a couple of months previous?

    We must remember, the Yuen Class SSK noted recently was
    branded as no more but a load of BS when it first entered the China.com rumor mill
    a year and a half ago. Some BS it’s proven to be now isn’t it???

    in reply to: Misc Pics Thread #2645584
    edisonone
    Participant

    :p

    Another “all time favorite”… The “G” series!

    http://bbs.china.com/images/2004-08-13/10923692382004811143746933.jpg

    What can I say but that old habits are hard to die out!

    :p

    edisonone
    Participant

    :rolleyes:

    If we are into aviation, we are into space. And that means
    all things weird. That also means all those UFOs that our flyboys and all the crazies around
    the country claimed they’ve seen or come accross on a daily basis while on the job.
    So! Anyone have a good story or X-File clip or two to tell???

    😉

    in reply to: Misc Pics Thread #2646802
    edisonone
    Participant

    😮

    Strange… Is the almost intentional blurring of this
    already well known well publicized A/C still necessary? Or is this merely
    somebody’s idea of his/her savvy in photoshopping???

    http://military.china.com/zh_cn/bbs/11018441/20040813/images/11831033_209636.jpg

    ( Related pic: http://bbs.china.com/images/2004-07-26/1090829458pic.jpg )

    In any case, the pic looks almost familiar. But, where???

    This one is also cool, IMHO, .
    http://bbs.china.com/images/2004-07-25/109072065910363947530105.jpg
    But, will it make its debute? Ever???

    More mysteries… What on earth are
    http://bbs.china.com/images/2004-08-11/109219675635356.jpg
    they trying to fiddle with here, I wonder?

    Hmmm… With well groomed designers as this, the end product
    http://bbs.china.com/images/2004-07-24/1090651682A.jpg
    has to be top rated and it has to be first class, my opinion!!!

    Landing gears?
    http://bbs.china.com/images/2004-07-24/1090673668.jpg
    Or other utilities????…

    in reply to: Taiwan exercise #2661938
    edisonone
    Participant

    Picture from the Sky News web site of an aircraft landing on the road at Tainan as part of a military exercise.

    http://61.132.72.44/dswc/upload/images/72087757990.jpg

    in reply to: China's new Yuan-class submarine #2075490
    edisonone
    Participant

    Hmm, I guess there is a difference then. Yuan could still be a smaller version fo the 09X, with a few differences.

    My recollection:

    About a year and a half or two years ago, there were rumors
    flying all over the net that the Chinese are working on, or was doing upgrades
    to their existing Kilo’s or of the Chinese carbon copies of this sub.

    At the time, rumors of the exitence of a Yuan Class was
    already circulating wildly on web along with the speculations that
    two 093 too has already been launched with one fully commissioned
    to the PLAN and the other on sea trial along with one 094.

    Hence, it was speculated, was the reason
    for the EP-3 to be where it was and thus resulting in the collision
    between the J-8 and the EP-3 in early 2000.

    The EP-3, it was speculated, was on a mission
    to try and keep a tab on the progress of these supposedly
    super quiet and highly classified Chinese subs.

    in reply to: China's new Yuan-class submarine #2075491
    edisonone
    Participant

    hmmmmmmmmmm………….?? :confused:

    http://www.centurychina.com/plaboard/uploads/w_1090309488.jpg

    If they cover it up the way they do, you can bet you bunny on it that they are
    trying to keep the contents from prying eyes. That hump, IMHO, is way too high for it to be
    a Kilo or for it to be an 093 and it’s way too distinct for it to be an 092 or 094.

    in reply to: China's new Yuan-class submarine #2075522
    edisonone
    Participant

    Personally I think it could be a new Kilo. Is this China’s Kilo copy? Or is this one of the new enhanced Kilo 636 with the Clubs? Maybe the Kilo 636 reporting can be in error, but this is a new Kilo variant.

    It’s got to be a Kilo. No way it’s a Song, man. But it’s not like any
    Kilo we have seen before. The stabilizers are there for real, not fake. This is a new Kilo *and* a new Kilo variant.

    I also wish to add that the first of the 8 new Kilos China ordered from Russia was already launched one or two months ago.

    If a new Kilo, then, US Naval Intelligence would say it’s a
    Russian Kilo. They definitely wouldn’t have give the Chinese more credit
    than they like them to have. I bet it’s in between an 091 and and an 092 or, what’s
    decribed in the net as a redesigned/upgraded Han class.

    in reply to: China's new Yuan-class submarine #2075605
    edisonone
    Participant

    😀

    To Whomever 😀 This May Apply:

    Man! I can definitely fathom how some of you may
    think of people as myself as no more but a load of crap and that everything
    “rusty bucket so-to-speak” has to always be “fake”.

    But strangely enough however, you guys don’t even
    seem to have any confidence in or trust in your own man Mr. Gertz and/or in that
    of the Office of US Naval Intelligence, do you guys???

    Sad! Really sad! I mean do you guys believe in anyone at all? I mean,
    do you guys even believe in yourself at times? Hey! If the mentality wasn’t based on the
    sentiments of “rusty bucket”, I definitely wouldn’t have rub it in as I did.

    With the ability for us to
    PS these days, who knows what else lurks out there in
    the depth of the Pacific!!!

    😀

    in reply to: China's new Yuan-class submarine #2075658
    edisonone
    Participant

    Personally I think it could be a new Kilo.

    The hump on the Kilo’s hull does not extend as far to the front of
    the sub (this design similar to German product) as this one does and, it does not
    have as many torpedo tubes (5 tubes on visible side) as this one.

    Remember: This sub was first spotted by US Intelligence.
    http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040716-123134-8152r.htm
    It was not done by some two bit computer geek on a PC.

    More envious rusty buckets, shall we say :)???

    in reply to: Shenyang J-11 (original) – Mirage F.1 look alike #2671510
    edisonone
    Participant

    Deino,

    It is a well known fact that, in the 60’s, that China had tried desperately
    to mimmic systems from the west, i.e., the Mirage-2000, the Tornado, the Phantom even,
    and, of course the MiG-23’s and the Su-22, plus a few other oddities.

    “Some had even claimed that they had tried to gather all
    of the pluses of the above and incorporate it into a single air frame and make it into
    something they percieve as the mother of all fighter planes.”

    But, to no avail, cost put a stopper to all of their aviation dreams.
    They had to settle for second best — which are J-7 variants, the A or Q-5s, and, of course the J-8’s to
    counter the threat they percieve may come from their northern flank.

    Therefore, their trying to come up with something like the F-1 isn’t surprising.

    in reply to: Friction between China and Japan to lead to war? #2671553
    edisonone
    Participant

    Lately, there has been friction over drilling platforms in the E. China Sea, and now
    the Japanese SDF White Paper explicitly lists concern over the rise of Chinese power. Will we
    see another potential conflict between the two asian nations in the next 10 years?

    E. China Sea drilling platforms:

    Went through that report briefly myself. But, more than just frictions
    over Japan’s drilling in what’s deemed as the green line (Or was it the blue line?), there has also been disputes
    over the Island chain known as Ryukus, or something like that anyhow.

    Regardless, Japan has always been a big mouth in the region because
    she has always used the US as a shield, or as a bargaining chip, when dealing with
    the Chinese. Therefore such actions by Japan is no surprise whatsoever.

    More than that, I think everyone in the region does that (Uses the US
    as bargaining chip) because of America’s military might in the region. But, these
    tit for tats shouldn’t lead to war because, the Chinese, even in the military status they’re in today,
    will not risk intimidating the US because “the US is its bread and butter”.

    I mean aside from the odd whinnings
    and complaints, will you dual it out with the guy who signs your paychecks?
    I don’t think any of us are that brave.

    in reply to: Recent publication of the still illusive J-10… #2671555
    edisonone
    Participant

    did the bison beat the f-15….all i heard wsa neubech saying that he was impressed with the bison..comming out of his mouth everthing seems rather fishy

    Unless the publisher was dramatizing the event,
    what it in fact says is that, in actual dogfight similations between Bisons
    and F-15s, the Bisons actually scored the hits.

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 704 total)