dark light

John Aeroclub

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 961 through 975 (of 2,313 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RAF Museum Sturmovik #1119958
    John Aeroclub
    Participant

    Allright for Miles Mohawk substitute Percival Mew Gull.

    Roger Smith.

    Well it was flown as an RAF fighter in the film “Things to Come”:)
    John

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1119976
    John Aeroclub
    Participant

    Jacobs Model 104

    John

    My missing subscription

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v405/Aeroclub/img403.jpg

    in reply to: Could this be made from a Spitfire prop? #1122658
    John Aeroclub
    Participant

    This is the Officers badge (below Air Rank) of the RAF (after 1st April 1918). The crown surmounting the Eagle above feathers which is what the wavy things represent. If I had to make an informed guess at this I would go for an Avro 504K propeller blade circa 1918 perhaps made into a stylised chair perhaps after being broken (pranged) by the original owner.

    The 504K was a standard two seat training aeroplane.

    Does the top badge have the letters RAF or RFC in the centre of the wing decoration?

    John

    in reply to: Could this be made from a Spitfire prop? #1122726
    John Aeroclub
    Participant

    Another possibility with the blade shape might be an Avro 504 (Clerget) I think the prop manufacturer might have been Lang. However without the details from the hub or some family history provenance linking to the RFC/RNAS/RAF in WWI we will never know.

    John

    in reply to: Could this be made from a Spitfire prop? #1123496
    John Aeroclub
    Participant

    The shape of the blade suggests to me it may be off a Le Rhone Sopwith Pup or a One and a half Strutter (Clerget). I think Pup (RNAS?) 1916/18 time. Most certainly not Spitfire.

    John

    in reply to: RAF Museum Sturmovik #1126147
    John Aeroclub
    Participant

    Why would the RAF Museum want a Sturmovik. The RAF never flew them or barring Korea ever fought against them. Let the russians keep their junk and give us our Stirling back 🙂

    John

    in reply to: Hawker Engineering Blueprints #1126155
    John Aeroclub
    Participant

    Of all the drawings I think the most interesting is the Horsley layout. I reveals a dual control facility for the gunner, which I thought had died out with Great War types.
    Thank you for posting the photos.

    I suppose you have the David Thirlby book The Chain Drive Frazer Nash.

    John

    in reply to: Hawker Engineering Blueprints #1126794
    John Aeroclub
    Participant

    James
    These are quite interesting as I don’t think these drawings exist elsewhere. At least for the Light Bomber which I think should be Night Bomber B19/27 of which a project drawing was done, The Mystery (single bay) biplane is again an early project/concept drawing for, I think, the Heron or possibly the F20/27.

    The Horsley especially and Hawfinch are better known and recorded.

    John
    So you like “Chain gangers”.

    in reply to: Crashed biplane – identification needed #1127865
    John Aeroclub
    Participant

    It’s Snipe E6629 of 32 Sqn. Collided with telegraph wires Lympe 1/10/24 after engine failure in formation takeoff (from Lympe). Note NF roundels. E7629 did not survive into the postwar RAF (not listed).

    John

    in reply to: Spitfire Mk 9 #1128615
    John Aeroclub
    Participant

    Yes there is a small oleo fixed to the end of the pivoting leg on the fixed tailwheel going down to the base of frame 19(a?).

    John

    in reply to: Spitfire Mk 9 #1128963
    John Aeroclub
    Participant

    This seems to be exactly what and why J-P is asking his question – presumably so his model can “stand” correctly even though the scale weight/construction is wrong. I presume you can only get the answer with a Spit IX and a tape measure.

    As an advanced sufferer of AMS* myself, I recognise the symptoms

    Richard

    *Advanced Modeller Syndrome. Do you get worried about how many rudder wires a Sopwith Pup had? I do…

    Well as a model designer myself with a particular interest in Spitfires (albeit smaller scales) I am having difficulty with the translation.

    Surely if there are no working oleos on the model and the model has been made to high quality drawings (?) then the measurements needed are the u/c angle of rake and an average loaded oleo length at rest. Hence my observation that the legs in the picture look too long to me.

    May I suggest a leg rake of 15 deg from the horizontal and a loaded oleo length the distance from the wheel centre to the underside of the wing along the u/c leg in full scale of 39 inches (99cm). The tail wheel centre to the fuselage (vertically above the centre) of a full scale 7 inches (17.5cm).

    This would give a typical Spitfire “sit”.

    John

    in reply to: RAF Airspeed Envoy (with turret) #1129007
    John Aeroclub
    Participant

    One of my all time favorites, especially in that colour scheme.

    Can anyone help with a decent original picture of the Duke of Windsor’s Pussmoth
    (G-ABBS) or other Pussmoths by this Royal owner.

    John

    in reply to: Rumour Of A Couple Of Whirlwinds… #1129013
    John Aeroclub
    Participant

    Hi
    ID models is no longer in existence, the whirlwind moulds/dies were sold to combat model in USA.
    As I understand it ID models did not produce the moulds/dies themselves, but purchased them from a modeller.
    cheers
    jerry

    The ID models were the product of a friend of mine and he did indeed produce all his own masters etc. When the owner retired he sold on the moulds to a third party (not Combat) who did virtually nothing with them . They have since been sold again and some are being updated and re-released. However it’s possible not all the old subjects will appear. I believe some were subject to unauthorised copying.

    John

    Just a codicle, The models were simple vacform shells to be used by the very skilled modeller/ scratchbuilder as a basis.

    in reply to: Spitfire Mk 9 #1129153
    John Aeroclub
    Participant

    Whilst not an exact measurement and given that the wheelbase distance will vary with the weight and between retractable and non retractable tail wheels for Vc and above try 20′ 3″ and 21′ (retractable) However the model in the picture has overly long main and tail oleo legs which will further confuse the issue.
    I must admit I’m not sure why you would want such a variable measurement?

    John

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1129154
    John Aeroclub
    Participant

    Is this a Glenn MO.1?
    John

Viewing 15 posts - 961 through 975 (of 2,313 total)