its a shame no one has asked him or thales or dassault to clarify what he said and meant by invissible, was it deception, different range, different aircraft, showing multiple aircraft, etc ?
We have no answer.
Even AC is just a journalist’s suggestion. So, imho, we simply don’t know, and aren’t supposed to know :D.
There are some very specific techniques to obtain the signature of a real LO [low-observable] aircraft.
We don’t know what he was referring to.
the other thing i have been wondering, and as i have said, i’m a pleb
“Dassault has stated that the EW transmit antennas can produce a pencil beam compatible with the accuracy of the receiver system (1 deg), concentrating power on the threat while minimizing the chances of detection”
Information found in Fox Three for the first time, but also published in several publications.
i fully accept directional rwr and have seen ‘sector’ but not the 1 deg
as for the jammer transmitting on 1 deg, i would like to know how its done as i havent heard of this before
Some of the arrays of Spectra are AESA (this is why Thales claimed that Rafale was already equiped with a 360 degrees AESA set).
You may want to look at this : http://rafale.freeforums.org/post102.html#p102
By the way, i’m not sure Dassault/Thales are the only one to claim they achieved the “under one degree” accuracy for ESM/ECM.
Sign In
