Not seen any 70th anniversary end of WW2 events planned for London 8th May. Sadly the only thing on the Governments mind will be who still has a job !!!
(For our international viewers I will explain that the United Kingdom has a country wide general election on 7th May)
and it may be that those in power today will not be in power on 8th May, and in any case they either dont give a t***s or are too scared about upsetting the Germans.
Why wouldn’t it be the contractorised S-92s from Humberside?
Guess we will have to wait and see what the new system will produce. The ‘Contract’ will have been written is a way that allows the ‘Contractor’ to provide aircraft and aircrew to a minimum required standard. Whether or not that standard is adequate is for debate, but expect bad news if it goes wrong. When you look at the map of new SAR locations there seem to be some gaps in cover, the Contractors will argue that the new equipment is better than the old, but time will tell.
Thankyou for your reply. Fully understand ‘airside’ rules and safety comes first, but if at sometime during the day the parking area can be considered ‘non-active’ most enthusiast would be happy to pay suitable small fee for access. Last time I visited Sywell the viewing area was really not suitable for good photos.
What ‘public’ ie none aircrew access will be available at Sywell on Saturday. Have attended Sywell in the past and been frustrated by rather limited viewing / photograph areas available.
Hope there is a successful outcome to the F-100 and Mystere. All thoughts are to preservation within the UK, but what is the state of affairs in France ? Are Mystere and F-100 well represented across aviation collections in France ?
Maybe a bit of thread drift but think we should also be concerned about the long term future of Duxford’s F-100. IIRC current plans for the AAM refit do not include for the F-100. If it is not returned to the hangar expect it to be on the ‘for sale’ list and I expect a low loader journey to Eastern Europe.
Always amazed to see how few fixing bolts hold the wings on.
Such a shame as two of the above could have been flown to Coventry, assuming space was available. Regarding space what hangar space is available at Coventry should CAF wish to expand, above the two currently in use.
Considering the current spate of planning applications to redevelop airfields (Kemble) I would doubt anywhere is safe. :apologetic:
Hopefully that idea is dead and buried !!!! Shame so much time, effort and money was wasted on the idea.
Time is right for the “Milestones” building to be rebranded, indeed no branding is required it simply needs connecting properly to the main building and the original main entrance reusing. A good idea would be better information / direction to the other buildings, BoB hangar and Graham White hangar always have seemed remote. Could the space between Milestones and GW be used as some kind of external / covered display. Thinking a WW1 canvas hanger, WW2 revetment, a cold war HAS with appropriate ground equipment ?
Not sure how suitable the old workshop buildings would be for the new cafe ? If space can be found on the site a better solution would be a new build cafe with assocatied play area, ect. I do not know the local Hendon area so have no idea if this would work but if the cafe were run by at external contractor could it be open outside of museum opening times ? Could it become a destination / meeting point in its own right ? Maybe sounds a bit kitsch but there are many examples of such theme restaurants in the USA.
Good idea Moggy. With that in mind may I be permitted to repost my earlier post.
“The museum’s plans include re-landscaping the site to create a sense of the original London Aerodrome”
What !!!!! Correct me if I am wrong but airfields tend to be flat, wide open spaces, without any major landscaping. Exactly what space is left within the confines of Hendon museum that can be landscaped ?
Money to be spent on new a new cafe, shop, visitors centre is a good idea, as it will ultimately repay for itself in sales. It will hopefully mean they will remove the small cafe / seating area from the main hangar.
If money allows hopefully the new building will be bigger enough to house conferences and small events, again this could prove a money spinner if marketed correctly. Book fairs, car auctions and the much missed Barnet model show have all taken place at Hendon before, but the current management appear not to want them. But if a suitable external building were available it might be different as a seperate admission charge could be applied for special events. The existing Hendon theatre / conference room is not suitable any more.
I remember when the new Museum Director was announced last year we all hoped that she would be a breath of fresh air, think there were many suggestions as to how we, as enthusiasts, could see the future improvements. It is often said that the powers that be do look at what is said on the Forum. sadly the last dozen posts above do not show us in the best light, bickering amougst ourselves.
“The museum’s plans include re-landscaping the site to create a sense of the original London Aerodrome”
What !!!!! Correct me if I am wrong but airfields tend to be flat, wide open spaces, without any major landscaping. Exactly what space is left within the confines of Hendon museum that can be landscaped ?
Money to be spent on new a new cafe, shop, visitors centre is a good idea, as it will ultimately repay for itself in sales. It will hopefully mean they will remove the small cafe / seating area from the main hangar.
If money allows hopefully the new building will be bigger enough to house conferences and small events, again this could prove a money spinner if marketed correctly. Book fairs, car auctions and the much missed Barnet model show have all taken place at Hendon before, but the current management appear not to want them. But if a suitable external building were available it might be different as a seperate admission charge could be applied for special events. The existing Hendon theatre / conference room is not suitable any more.
Couple of shots taken at Dayton. PM me if you require higher res images.
Paul
[ATTACH=CONFIG]236212[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]236213[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]236086[/ATTACH]
Looks good to me. OK its not a war time bomber ready to go on a mission, but how much original material would be left if the Hendon airframe where rebuilt.
PM sent
I agree with that, a very significant and long-serving type in Royal Air Force history; though I doubt whether IWM would have been offered a free C-130 in these cash-strapped times.
DD
If I remember correctly IWM were offered a RAF C-130 and Marshalls were going to be involved in as well, Marshalls having a long association with the C-130 and being local to Duxford.
IWM were offered a Nimrod as around the same time, but the current management seem unable to look beyond the next quilt show, and turned the offer down simply because they could not provide hangar space.
It is a sad fact that you can not save them all. I did hear that the original ‘Snoopy’ nose was removed and put into storage. Would make a nice, but very large, display if it could be preserved as a cockpit / forward fuselage section. The old Boscombe Down collection would be a good location.
Rather than bemoaning the loss of XV208, the fact that only one RAF Hercules had been preserved, XV202 at Cosford, is cause for concern. Given the length of service and contribution the C-130 fleet has given the RAF it is surprising that IWM Duxford did not accept one of the remaining C1/C3 aircraft, several of which had excellent service history, including Falklands War service.