dark light

…starfire

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 394 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: ME262 to fly over Germany- 60 Years later… #1340716
    …starfire
    Participant

    Here on this German speaking site are some pics of the Allison-/Dora-engine. The complete engine conversion is actually carried out by ACE-Allison Competition Engines in Pennsylvania.

    http://www.pozefilm.de/fw190.html

    However, it does not look like they are going to install it inverted …

    in reply to: Strathallan Aircraft Collection #1355418
    …starfire
    Participant

    If things had worked out differently we might still have an airworthy Mosquito in Britain as well as an airworthy Battle and a privately owned airworthy Lancaster.

    :confused: Lacking any background knowlege … what happend to the Battle and the Lanc?

    in reply to: Pilots who flew in both WW1 and WW2 #1361291
    …starfire
    Participant

    Recently I read “Hurricanes over Tobruk”. It mentions the AOC in Egypt, Raymond Colishaw, former leader of the “black flight”. During the first days of fighting against the Italians, he piloted a Vicers Valentia on a night sortie to El Adem.

    He had a very interesting career in the RAF until he was finally retired in 1943. I never knew about that. I always thought at the end of WWI he went back into civil life, like many others … 😮

    http://www.constable.ca/colishaw.htm

    in reply to: For the historic modellers amongst you…. #231107
    …starfire
    Participant

    Thailand is or was formerly known as Siam. The now French based Spitfire PS890 was actually donated to a museum (Planes of Fame?) in the US by the king/emperor of Siam long ago.

    Two other kit-related sites:
    http://modelingmadness.com/index.htm
    http://www.fortunecity.com/meltingpot/portland/971/home.htm

    in reply to: Pilots who flew in both WW1 and WW2 #1386650
    …starfire
    Participant
    in reply to: Pilots who flew in both WW1 and WW2 #1386824
    …starfire
    Participant

    I’m sure that we can come up with a few more if we put our collective thinking caps on. How about Milch, Goering and (I think) the younger brother of the Red Baron. OK so they weren’t combat pilots in WWII but I believe they flew if only for a short while.

    I regard Milch and Goering “only” as Pencil-Pushers, scince they did not take part on active flying. The younger brother of v.R., Lothar, died during a plane crash in the 1920s, their cousin Wolfram v.R. was too young to have fought in WWI.

    in reply to: Pilots who flew in both WW1 and WW2 #1387011
    …starfire
    Participant

    The first one to come into my mind is Theo Osterkamp who flew fighters in WWI and led a Jagdgeschwader during the Battle of Britain.

    in reply to: French Air force aeronavale foreigne type #1396400
    …starfire
    Participant

    Nice pics, do you have some Aeronavale-Do-24 pictures in your attic as well?

    in reply to: No 75 OTU North Africa #1410049
    …starfire
    Participant

    lol

    in reply to: No 75 OTU North Africa #1410271
    …starfire
    Participant

    Another challenge? However I´ll leave many with a “?”.

    29 to 33 – Westland Lysander
    35 – the german Gotha? glider mentioned before
    36 – Mathilda-tank
    39 – Bristol Blenheim
    56 – again a Sonder-Kraftfahrzeug 251 (Sd.Kfz.251)
    57 – remains of a German Pz IV
    67 – German Self Propelled Gun on Panzer 38t chassis (the Pz. 38 t were taken over from the Czech after occuptaion in 1938)
    68 – Junkers Ju 87 D of Stukageschwader 3
    69 – Junkers Ju 87 D of Stukageschwader 3
    71 – Junkers Ju 87 D
    72 – Junkers Ju 53/3m
    73 – Me / Bf 109 E
    74 – Me / Bf 109 F or G
    75 – Heinkel He 111, maybe from Wekusta 26 (the Code 5Z+ suggests that, but I don´t know what a Wekusta is)
    76 – burnt down Junkers Ju 87?
    77 – Me / Bf 109 F or G
    78 – remains of a Junkers Ju 52/3m?
    79 – italian bomber SM79 Sparviero?
    102 – Bristol Beaufighter
    103 – Grumman Martlet (RAF-name) / Wildcat (US-name)
    104 – Tiger Moth, don´t know the plane in the backgrund
    105 – Curtiss P-40
    144 – Martin Baltimore?
    145 – Bristol Beaufighter
    151 – North American B-25 Mitchell
    154 – Lockhhed Hudson / Ventura?
    155 – Bristol Blenheim Mk.I
    157 – Lockhhed Hudson / Ventura?

    Feel free to correct …

    in reply to: No 75 OTU North Africa #1414160
    …starfire
    Participant

    Sorry to say but starfire is wrong on this 109F1 to 4 and 109G2 are not Me but Bf
    I have all the D-Luft servicing and spares manuals to back this up.

    Really? 😮 I stand corrected.

    However, my “Bible of German Aeroplanes” (Heinz Nowarra, Die Deutsche Luftrüstung 1933 – 1945) said the 109 became a “Me” with the “E”-Model and the 110 with the “C”-Model, so I relyed / relied (?) on it.

    in reply to: No 75 OTU North Africa #1414424
    …starfire
    Participant

    Pics 93 & 94. Are they Bf or Me designation? Or is this one of those where it doesn’t really matter. I seem to recall that Bf 109 was the official designation, since the design was from the Bayerische Flugzeugwerke (spelling?) company. But because the company was renamed to Messerschmitt, did some of the later aircraft actually carry the Me 109 designation?

    Indeed the “Bayerische Flugzeugwerke AG” were renamed “Messerschmitt AG” in September 1938. The early versions of the 109 and 110 had the prefix “Bf”, the later ones “Me”. However it was / is common practice to call the early ones “Me”, too.
    About the 109: The “Dora” (Bf 109 D) was the last “Bf”-version, followed by the Me 109 E.

    Pic 102. As I mention, I can only go by the inscriptions that are in the album below the photo or on the back of the photos themselves. In this case it simply reads ‘Russian Tanks’. However, Starfire identifies the tanks as German Panzer I A or B. Could this be the case, as they certainly look like Russian soldiers? Would they have commandeered the tanks after the German surrender / defeat.

    The tanks are German built Panzer I tanks, which were already obsolete in 1939. Im mid 1941 about 150 were still in use, mainly for instructional purposes.
    You might think the crews are Russian because of their strange looking caps. However, these were standard issue for German tank crews from the early days of the Wehrmacht.
    I think this picture is actually a copy of a (propaganda-?)photo taken during a maneuver before the outbreak of WWII. Don´t know, how this one got into the collection, but like the Graf-Spee-photo, this one somehow does not fit into the context, too …

    in reply to: No 75 OTU North Africa #1416511
    …starfire
    Participant

    07 – Messerschmitt Me 109 F or G
    08 – Messerschmitt Me 110
    09 – Messerschmitt Me 109 F or G
    93 – Messerschmitt Me 109 E
    94 – Messerschmitt Me 109 F or G
    97 – Messerschmitt Me 110 of Zerstörergeschwader 26 (Marking 3U = ZG26)
    103 – Heinkel He 111

    95 – Panzer IV (Pz.IV), not sure which mark
    98 – Sd.Kfz.251, not sure which mark
    100 – most likely the same Pz.IV as shown in 95
    102 – German tank Panzer I A or B (Pz.IA/B)

    96 – Self Propelled Gun, Chassis seems to be of french origin (Blinde 37-Chassis, was also used for some Marder I tank hunters)

    in reply to: Spotty Spitfire #1418743
    …starfire
    Participant

    The serial of the Spit should be X4815, try and have a look.

    EDIT: Ta-dah …. http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=32428&highlight=x4815

    in reply to: Hawker Hurricane's 70th Birthday ! #1420297
    …starfire
    Participant

    Well … having no pics of real ones, my modest contribution to this thread are some 1/72 Hurricanes out of my own “workshop”.

    Happy birthday, Hurri!!!

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 394 total)