dark light

TwinOtter23

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,791 through 2,805 (of 7,125 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #257652
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Yes – a carefully considered spelling in light of a recent encounter outside a park in Arnold!! 😀

    in reply to: General Discussion #257662
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    The cycle lanes in Cambridge are over grown and a bush is likely to knock you off in the dark,they are shared with pedestrians who basically walk all over the place with headphones in.The cycle lanes are also more likely to have all the debris on them causing punctures.

    To be honest the ones that I use round Nottingham are reasonably well maintained and in a good state of repair – yet most other cyclists ignore them and use the roads, some of which are poorly maintained and full of potholes.

    Around where I live we also have a large section of ‘duel-use’ cycle / pedestrian tracks as well – sadly when I’m sometimes out walking (on the correct bit of pedestrian track) I always attract the impatient ‘bell-ringing’ brigade as well!!

    As for Cambridge, please don’t get me started. I’m not sure what the cycle tracks are like, but the ‘lemmings’ seem to have little sense of road manners or etiquette. My oldest son is now living out near Addenbrooke’s Hospital and even out there some of the road-sense on display by cyclists is lamentable.

    The above comments are written as a driver who also rides his bicycle and who appreciates the issues involved with both forms of transportation.

    in reply to: On yer bike ! #1858796
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    The cycle lanes in Cambridge are over grown and a bush is likely to knock you off in the dark,they are shared with pedestrians who basically walk all over the place with headphones in.The cycle lanes are also more likely to have all the debris on them causing punctures.

    To be honest the ones that I use round Nottingham are reasonably well maintained and in a good state of repair – yet most other cyclists ignore them and use the roads, some of which are poorly maintained and full of potholes.

    Around where I live we also have a large section of ‘duel-use’ cycle / pedestrian tracks as well – sadly when I’m sometimes out walking (on the correct bit of pedestrian track) I always attract the impatient ‘bell-ringing’ brigade as well!!

    As for Cambridge, please don’t get me started. I’m not sure what the cycle tracks are like, but the ‘lemmings’ seem to have little sense of road manners or etiquette. My oldest son is now living out near Addenbrooke’s Hospital and even out there some of the road-sense on display by cyclists is lamentable.

    The above comments are written as a driver who also rides his bicycle and who appreciates the issues involved with both forms of transportation.

    in reply to: On yer bike ! #1858839
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    I occasionally cycle for exercise on the wide range of cycle tracks and lanes around Nottingham / Nottinghamshire – but as a car driver why do the ‘cyclists’ still insist on using the roads – even when the cycle lanes run parallel to them? Quite frankly many times they’re just … :stupid:

    in reply to: General Discussion #257696
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    I occasionally cycle for exercise on the wide range of cycle tracks and lanes around Nottingham / Nottinghamshire – but as a car driver why do the ‘cyclists’ still insist on using the roads – even when the cycle lanes run parallel to them? Quite frankly many times they’re just … :stupid:

    in reply to: Newark Air Museum Briefing – 2013 #996442
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Infrastructure is vital and NAM has received its first Just Giving Project Panini donation – from the USA!! 🙂

    Also, a mailshot has been sent out this afternoon for the Spring Indoor Aeroboot / Aerojumble Sale at NAM, which is scheduled for Saturday 1st March 2014 – for anyone not emailed, further details etc. can be found in the usual place!

    in reply to: Unknown cockpit #996461
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    It’s unusual: removing a cockpit from a production line just so it could be used for a procedures trainer.

    That’s supposedly the same ‘back-story’ to the Victor cockpit that’s just been taken on loan by Newark. :confused:

    in reply to: General Discussion #258145
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    IX(B) Squadron’s Australian personnel provided some interesting material for Bardney, including a quite rare photograph of a Grand Slam Lancaster with some unusual aircraft tail markings. Unfortunately it wasn’t quite good enough quality to make the booklet, but it did feature in the booklet launch presentation, which was based around a theme of ‘connections’ – the Log Book that features on the Bardney page belonged to one of the people featured in the ‘Grand Slam’ photograph!! (Both accessed independently around 30 years apart!!)

    in reply to: Woodhall Spa #1859203
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    IX(B) Squadron’s Australian personnel provided some interesting material for Bardney, including a quite rare photograph of a Grand Slam Lancaster with some unusual aircraft tail markings. Unfortunately it wasn’t quite good enough quality to make the booklet, but it did feature in the booklet launch presentation, which was based around a theme of ‘connections’ – the Log Book that features on the Bardney page belonged to one of the people featured in the ‘Grand Slam’ photograph!! (Both accessed independently around 30 years apart!!)

    in reply to: Aviation Book Sale at Nelsam #997020
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Good luck with the sale next weekend, whilst I’ll be in the area, sadly I won’t be able to call in.

    I am looking for the following book for someone connected with NAM: “The man who would not die” by Desmond L Plunkett.

    Any lead for a copy would be appreciated! 🙂

    in reply to: Newark Air Museum Briefing – 2013 #997206
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    The first comment is fair enough – post #191 amended!

    I’ve been involved with most of NAM’s planning matters for the last 25 years (including: 2 Hangars; an enforcement notice re top-soil removal from the Southfield Site; various external planning appeals against potential ‘new neighbours’; etc.) and in all of that time NAM hasn’t encountered any such problems with this particular ‘exhibit’ / building – call it what we will. Maybe they have just been lucky!!

    Who knows perhaps Scampton might want it back if their new heritage project proceeds!!

    I don’t disagree with your CSDE observation, but the World War II era is only a secondary aspect of the museum’s Collection and Disposal Policy.

    As a slight aside the CSDE information search is still underway here and also about these parts.

    ‘Project Panini’ anyone? :eagerness:

    in reply to: General Discussion #258272
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Thanks for the additional feedback Despkpilot; however I think that we’ve sorted the location of the former RAF Woodhall Spa memorial i.e. it’s now just down the road at Thorpe Camp.

    I was aware of the ‘Upkeep’ remains at the Petwood and I always keep an eye out for it when reversing in and out of the nearby car parking spaces.

    You might be interested in an aviation booklet can be downloaded in PDF format by following this link!

    The new memorial leaflet is mentioned in this booklet and it will supplement its contents!

    in reply to: Woodhall Spa #1859351
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Thanks for the additional feedback Despkpilot; however I think that we’ve sorted the location of the former RAF Woodhall Spa memorial i.e. it’s now just down the road at Thorpe Camp.

    I was aware of the ‘Upkeep’ remains at the Petwood and I always keep an eye out for it when reversing in and out of the nearby car parking spaces.

    You might be interested in an aviation booklet can be downloaded in PDF format by following this link!

    The new memorial leaflet is mentioned in this booklet and it will supplement its contents!

    in reply to: Newark Air Museum Briefing – 2013 #997383
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    The ‘exhibit’ actually lost some ‘originality’ when its roof was replaced with cladding a few years ago. As for the flooding it is perhaps better described as seepage, as in certain conditions (i.e. the wind is in the right direction when it rain) the water is blown between the bitumen on the bottom of the walls and that on the concrete.

    As for the era represented, perhaps the museum wishes to lean more towards the CSDE time of the Cold War in the late 1950s. I don’t believe there are any such records of such wooden building at Winthorpe, as it didn’t have a ‘Band-Hut’, which is the name that it is believed the building had at RAF Scampton, complete with a pre-World War II construction date.

    In all the years the Dambusters Hut has been in situ I don’t recall the museum encountering that definition of temporary – it certainly wasn’t picked up late last week when the ratings officer visited site to revalue the building stock; this visit being triggered by the acceptance of the new Storage Building formally into use.

    in reply to: Newark Air Museum Briefing – 2013 #997917
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    I also understand what you’re saying about improving the wartime feel (is that what NAM wants to achieve?) however making it more permanent with a new concrete slab etc. would require planning permission; in its current ‘exhibit’ format i.e. technically it’s moveable so it doesn’t require approval.

    Also, there’s no way that the wooden structure of the ‘Dambusters Hut’ would meet the modern building regulations for all of the ‘green’ / environmental regulations etc., as a consequence the perceived ‘low-cost’ option becomes a lot more expensive. It’s a similar cost-comparison that you encounter when looking at re-using most old style buildings; it’s invariably simpler and cheaper to go for new.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,791 through 2,805 (of 7,125 total)