😮 As you’ve probably realised by now engines have never been my strongpoint – less subtlety in future me thinks!
As for the Mysteres et al they were funded by the Lend Lease Programme – circa 1947 US Secretary of State, Gen George Marshall was negotiating with the Soviets, when talks stalled – US then offered assistance programmes to willing European countries, which the Soviets named the ‘Marshall Plan’.
Basically the F100s, T33s, Mysteres etc were funded by the US and they reclaimed them. In the UK each one is technically on a 99 year loan from the USAF and each year photos and a report has to be submitted to Dayton re their condition. As an interesting aside – all of the ‘challenging’ materials were removed a long time before they became contentious here!! 😉
pagen – you may well be correct; perhaps the OP can advise. If it’s in the Engine Display he’s taken more care of the white balance than I normally do!! 😀
wiseman – pleased to assist, Newark Air Museum fought a long battle with the taxman to make it all happen back in 1976/7! 😉
:confused: The post was intended to tantalise and was referring to the detailed engine shot of what I thought was the ‘Bristol Hercules’ engine (if that’s what the picture is) on the Varsity (not the Hastings fuselage photograph).
I’ve taken a similar shots looking through one of the ‘exhaust vent panels’ on the engine cowling (4th photo in on the Varsity section of Empedia) but I’ve never gone in that close. :confused:
There are several Mystere IV’s in UK collections thanks to a USAF disposal scheme in the 1970s – some interesting pictures in this old thread including the Mystere IV pictured on this current photo thread! 🙂
A nice set on what looks like a nice day!
I like the ‘Varsity’ shot – I’ve never seen it as detailed as that!! 😉
Good to meet you both yesterday and it was a pleasure to show you round the Shackleton – even better was the fact that I was able to learn from your combined Shackleton knowledge!
The Canberra models were displayed to try and illustrate the diversity of the type in all of its guises – including 7 Squadron at RAF St Mawgan!!
They will form part of the display we’re hosting in May this year to mark 60th Anniversary of the Canberra entering RAF Service.
As for the MiGs they’re both on loan from a company in North Wales and were repainted into representative markings a couple of years ago. I do have some move photographs for both MiGs but I’ve not found the time to get them scanned – once this has been done I’ll try and get them uploaded the Move Galleries on the website!
Thanks for the positive comments!!
Wasn’t British Airways one of the orginial ‘owners / partners’ in the London Eye project – could that be one of the reasons for trying for the proposed location? :confused:
Mixed reports about why they sold their share in the mid-2000s!
It seemed funny before the “Thread titles just quoting serial numbers” thread was locked – especially as the OP (Original Poster) was a Mod!! 😀
Blue skies Dave!
:confused: What’s XM603 ?? :diablo:
Newark Air Museum it is then!! 😀
…. Then, perhaps we would all be happy.:)
😮 😮 …. on a web forum? Never!! 😮 😮
:confused: Who knows, I’d be making more money if I was ‘Tax Consultant’ – one would hope that someone has already spoken to Mr Pooley on the link provided a few weeks ago! 😉
NAM didn’t hold much hope initially – but the rebates helped get 16 aircraft inside a building!! 😀
– not that I realised we had to abide by EU taxation rules, but there you are..
Don’t knock, it in the Exemption case it’s beneficial legislation – “The exemption was introduced by EU law in 1990 but was only gradually implemented in the UK and remains the subject of much confusion. A surprising number of taxpayers are still ignorant of the exemption and continue to pay VAT on such exempt income over to HMRC.” 😀
:diablo: I cannot resist!
If you do a little searching further details may become apparent!
The only clue is that it’s within the last month!! 😀