dark light

TwinOtter23

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 5,041 through 5,055 (of 7,125 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #290601
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    A quick search turns up a few references on wind farms and radar:

    http://www.theengineer.co.uk/radar-resists-wind-farm-interference/1001686.article

    http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/dod/jason/wind.pdf

    http://www.crh.noaa.gov/mkx/?n=windfarm

    … there’s a lot more information out there, including new technologies!!

    in reply to: Windfarm debate – was Duxford airshows at risk? #1883399
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    A quick search turns up a few references on wind farms and radar:

    http://www.theengineer.co.uk/radar-resists-wind-farm-interference/1001686.article

    http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/dod/jason/wind.pdf

    http://www.crh.noaa.gov/mkx/?n=windfarm

    … there’s a lot more information out there, including new technologies!!

    in reply to: Windfarm debate – was Duxford airshows at risk? #1883412
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Thanks for the clarification Ringo.

    I have some limited experience in the wind turbine sector and I think that I’d be correct in saying that their true impact on aviation safety is not fully understood; e.g. the physics of ‘cones of radar silence’ etc.

    For some Wind Farm applications the MOD make planning objections, for others they don’t – there seems to be no consistency from them! :confused:

    As for planning permission there are several stages of the appeal process e.g. I have just helped fight against a planning appeal with the Planning Inspectorate and lost; however we were successful in having several conditions imposed on the application, which in our case ‘should’ help cushion the impact of the proposed project.

    One suggestion I would make to you is that planning decisions rely heavily on the facts and the more factual you can make your case against the application the more chance you’ll have of success; try to channel the emotion of the campaign more effectively!

    One word of caution – the much trailed easing of ‘bureaucracy’ by the government may make it easier for such applications; although I’m not sure that it will be a retrospective legislation if introduced.

    in reply to: General Discussion #290614
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Thanks for the clarification Ringo.

    I have some limited experience in the wind turbine sector and I think that I’d be correct in saying that their true impact on aviation safety is not fully understood; e.g. the physics of ‘cones of radar silence’ etc.

    For some Wind Farm applications the MOD make planning objections, for others they don’t – there seems to be no consistency from them! :confused:

    As for planning permission there are several stages of the appeal process e.g. I have just helped fight against a planning appeal with the Planning Inspectorate and lost; however we were successful in having several conditions imposed on the application, which in our case ‘should’ help cushion the impact of the proposed project.

    One suggestion I would make to you is that planning decisions rely heavily on the facts and the more factual you can make your case against the application the more chance you’ll have of success; try to channel the emotion of the campaign more effectively!

    One word of caution – the much trailed easing of ‘bureaucracy’ by the government may make it easier for such applications; although I’m not sure that it will be a retrospective legislation if introduced.

    in reply to: General Discussion #290643
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Just out of interest has anything been issued by IWM Duxford themselves about this topic, which one would think might have a potential impact on one of their revenue streams? :confused:

    in reply to: Windfarm debate – was Duxford airshows at risk? #1883420
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Just out of interest has anything been issued by IWM Duxford themselves about this topic, which one would think might have a potential impact on one of their revenue streams? :confused:

    in reply to: Binbrook Hangar Fire! #1096666
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Nice to see the former RAF buildings being put to a productive use – I hope that they can get back into production quickly! 🙂

    in reply to: Binbrook Hangar Fire! #1096761
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    From one of the internal hangar pictures from this morning there seems to be a yellow coloured inclined conveyor in the foreground, which might indicate some sort of recycling equipment – looking at the intensity of the fire I would guess perhaps plastic recycling of some kind. Machinery fire??

    in reply to: What value a Hunter?? #1096773
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    The last ‘free’ one I was offered (summer 2010) – suddenly had its value raised to £7,500!!

    in reply to: Newark Air Museum Briefing #1097769
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Indoor Aeroboot 12.03.11

    More photographs have been added to the bequest Album in the Photo Gallery that show ‘more’ items that the museum will be selling. This now includes many airliner photographs that have been found amongst the bequeathed items. 🙂

    I’ve been asked to remind everyone that all 48 tables have been sold for the Aeroboot itself. Please remember that admission on the day is only £4.00 per person, which is nearly half the normal adult admission rate.

    Gates open at 8.00am for Sellers and the public are admitted at 9.00am; these times will be strictly enforced, with no early entries for non-sellers.

    in reply to: Newark Air Museum Briefing #1098815
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    The Mk.6 ‘Pyrene’ left many years ago and went back to its owner. They’d been purchased for modification to X-Ray pipelines, but the project never went ahead – several hours happily driving it up and alongside the runway; talk of putting it back into local ‘service’ during the ‘Winter of Discontent’ in the late 1970s and always drove best over rough ground with a loaded water tank!! 😀

    Sadly no other vehicles, no longer on the ‘Collection & Disposal Policy’ – apart from an ambulance that needs collecting by its owner!

    I understand that someone displayed a couple of Goddesses at the last Photo Shoot, but only for the day.

    in reply to: Newark Air Museum Briefing #1098944
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    A quick update!

    The Vulcan delivery Album has been reloaded onto the Gallery page of the NAM website; but sadly the previously mentioned video clip is not online yet! 😮

    Plus a new Object of the Week has been added. 🙂

    in reply to: Newark Air Museum Briefing #1099691
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    MJA01 – thank you for your comments, details of which have been passed on to the people that you met yesterday and I’m glad that you had an enjoyable visit. NAM always tries to provide a good experience but yes this can vary due to availability of volunteers, who still give their time freely to provide these extra aspects to a museum visit. 🙂

    pagen – as for possible airframe deliveries by air; sadly for a variety of reason Winthorpe’s runways are now beyond realistic repair for use by large aircraft; as was identified during surveys undertaken when evaluating options for the now abandoned R1 acquisition. 🙁

    in reply to: Newark Air Museum Briefing #1100326
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Just out of interest how did the Vulcan, Hastings, and Varsity arrive?

    As mentioned by others they all flew in to Winthorpe:

    Varsity – 1 April 1976 from RAF Finningley

    Hastings – 22 June 1977 from RAF Scampton

    Vulcan – 7 February 1983 from RAF Waddington

    Sadly I missed both the Hastings and Varsity deliveries. The Hastings was particularly galling as I was waiting to start my first job having just completed my A-Levels and I could easily have been there; I had to put up with a tour around the aircraft in the evening. Sadly there’re not many landing photographs around – I’ll try and get someone to check in the Archive.

    There was an Album of my photographs in the NAM Gallery at the beginning of February showing the Vulcan delivery – I’ll try and get them reinstated sometime. Tomorrow I may even be able to add a link for an online video clip of the landing – fingers crossed on that one!! 😉

    in reply to: Newark Air Museum Briefing #1100936
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Yes – there’s a lot of other stuff still to come over to the museum, it was partly covered here hopefully more photographs will be added to the album before March 12th; plus I understand that we might already have received one ‘trade’ enquiry about some items!

    As for the transportation side; some of the moves have featured in specialist vehicle publications e.g. some of MARTSU Gannet move pictures have been published in a specialist lorry magazine.

    Even now, the Ward Gnome is about to be featured in the ‘Citroen Specials Club’ magazine because of its use of a 2CV engine! 😀

Viewing 15 posts - 5,041 through 5,055 (of 7,125 total)