dark light

TwinOtter23

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 5,206 through 5,220 (of 7,125 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: BAPC no's #1091803
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Still in use as far as I’m aware – not sure how you get one allocated!

    Try looking here http://www.bapc.org.uk/ 🙂

    Just looked on my PDF of the 2010 NAHR (National Aviation Heritage Register) no mention of them in there (only as listed airframes); ironically the last airframe in the NAHR is NAM’s Zurowski ZP1 helicopter – BAPC 204, which would have been allocated circa 1984/5.

    in reply to: Aircraft in a Yorkshire lake? #1092584
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Knipton Lancaster?

    Just a thought – about that time a Lancaster wing tip was recovered from Knipton reservoir near Grantham, Lincs (Yorkshire TV still covers some parts of Lincs); could it have been about that recovery?

    It was from Lancaster R5726 that broke up in mid-air on April 4th 1944. The wing tip is on display in Lancaster Corner at Newark.

    in reply to: Comet at Lyneham no longer doomed….! #1093642
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    As has been posted elsewhere, NAM’s ‘Nimrod allocated funds’ have now been reallocated to other worthy projects!

    Also for the sake of clarity ‘the report’ being mentioned was produced by the RAFM following a survey they carried out in November 2008 – having read it and helped consider the implications for a volunteer based group like NAM I personally didn’t even want to request an inspection visit.

    in reply to: Comet at Lyneham no longer doomed….! #1093676
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Having read the ‘report’ my personal opinion is that it’s a ‘money pit’ that is now perhaps beyond saving – but I wish anyone well who tries!

    in reply to: Newark Air Museum Briefing #1093777
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    John,

    The ‘official posts’ on Britmodeller et al were aimed at provoking some thought about the hobby and has produced some interesting responses; some in line with what you have posted and others going more down the Observer Corps route.

    This latter thought is interesting, given the debate over NAM’s origins i.e. the ROC or ATC ‘factions!’ Hopefully later this month I may get another view on the matter when I visit Peter Green for a spot of ‘Canberra related gossip’.

    The Archive is proving to be inspirational and a real eye-opener; with such a wealth of material hitherto being tucked away and now slowly coming into the light of day.

    As I type a new Archive page is being prepared as part of an update to the museum website. As part of that process I photographed the cover of one of the oldest publications currently in the Archive a copy of The Aero from Tuesday June 29th 1909.

    Whilst I haven’t read it myself I’m told that interestingly it has more of a modelling slant to its content, rather than ‘live-airframes’ – this may feature as a future topic for Object of the Month.

    in reply to: Comet at Lyneham no longer doomed….! #1093786
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    With all due respect if you read all the treads on this airframe “walked away!” is not a true reflection on the ‘reality’ of the situation – whereas ‘sensible considered decision’ might be! 🙁

    in reply to: Newark Air Museum Briefing #1094079
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Over the last 24 hours several news updates have been added to the News Page of the museum website.

    This includes the latest Object of the Week that may give an insight into how the phrase ‘Plane Spotter’ came about!

    in reply to: Recording paint colours #1094855
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Just one note of caution – the Pantone method would be good for recording / noting a colour, but it could be a nightmare for then trying to match an industrial paint to it at a later date! (Bitter past experiences between the marketing people and production!! :eek:)

    in reply to: The And Now For Something Completely Different….Thread #1096629
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Nice Egyptian link – to keep this going and to try throw it open a bit more, NAM’s Gnat that is listed here, wears a 4 FTS badge that has a pyramid and palm tree on it!

    in reply to: Aviation classics Vulcan #1096816
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    … and the delivery of XM594 into Newark!

    :diablo: Someone’s after my job!! 😀

    in reply to: The And Now For Something Completely Different….Thread #1097002
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Newark’s Jaguar GR.1 cockpit XX753 (9087M) wears 6 Squadron (Can Opener) RAF markings on one side and will be on display at this years Cockpit-Fest!

    in reply to: Newark Air Museum Briefing #1097824
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Squadron & Group photographs

    I’m not fully conversant with the pictures that you’re referring to and I certainly wasn’t aware of the ‘multiple participants’ but I will have a more detailed look the next time I visit. That said stories like this are brilliant as they bring even the simplest of objects to life and in so doing enhance the importance of the object.

    I have spoken with the museum’s Curator and he has provided me with the following additional information about the three specific pictures that you referred to; these were of, and taken at:

    107 Squadron, RAF Hemswell *** please see revised details of post #319

    83 Squadron, RAF Scampton

    HQ 5 Group at Grantham

    He also advised that there were two other similar pictures displayed in the same building:

    50 Squadron, RAF Lindholme

    106 Squadron, RAF Coningsby

    As you indicated sadly none of these pictures have names on them. However there are two smaller group type photographs on display, which both have nearly full sets of names. One is of a training course at RAF Tollerton and the other is a rare colour photograph of a group of armourers pictured in the bomb dump at RAF Winthorpe.

    in reply to: A Time for Reflection #1098272
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    The research contributions made by Kev and others, plays a vital role in helping museums, groups and individuals to develop the stories that interpret the objects / collections – the value of that role should not be underestimated. Such input has played (and will continue to play) an important part in allowing projects to develop and enable many ‘real stories’ to be told!

    Keep up the good work!! 🙂

    in reply to: Newark Air Museum Briefing #1098782
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    The photograph in the ‘Object of the Week’ item on the museum website has now been updated and it can be seen here it now shows Thomas Newbery’s POW i.d.; Thomas was the wireless operator on Lancaster ME846.

    Along with the actual card and photographs the NAM Archive also has the original Agfa black and white negatives for the two i.d. photographs!

    in reply to: Newark's Luscombe Query ? #1100094
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Not an issue to me but you might need to be mindful of any copyright issues as the PDF was created directly from a photocopy of an original copy created for ‘research purposes!’

    The guide book quote earlier in the post is OK as I prepared the original text!

    It’s nice that more NAM Archive material is getting an airing! 🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 5,206 through 5,220 (of 7,125 total)