Jets are OK if you dont mind suffering from impared hearing….
Try ‘discussing’ that with former Shackleton crews!! :confused:
Indeed perhaps it’s the people (designers, constructors, pilots, ground crew, museum volunteers etc) that are really important in all of this and not the aircraft!! 😮
(Tin hat firmly in place!) 😀
Sadly no system is perfect and I am also aware of issues at ‘registered organisations’ – but at least you have somewhere (MLA) to go to with any complaint to seek arbitration or whatever. Something that you don’t easily have if a site is not registered or accredited!
However as pointed out by Pondskater the MLA looks set to close in 2012! 🙁
…Why not do something positive, ….
IIRC Matt does, by looking after a rather nice cockpit of his own!! 😉
…I do worry about the future of classic aircraft such as the Canberra, Hunter,Gnat to name a few as people seem far happier to see 15 Spitfires in the air rather then a couple of classic jets……might just be my age:confused:………and before you say it i totally respect what the Spitfire did for us in WW2 that dos’nt mean we forget about the rest…
😮 … Heretic burn him!!! :diablo: 😀
A good starting point is to ensure that the museum you make a loan to is a ‘Registered’ or ‘Accredited’ Museum with the MLA. Details on this link including a list of those already part of, or applying for the scheme.
As a minimum these organisations will issue you with paperwork setting out the agreed terms when you make a loan.
Individual site conditions can also have an impact on the actual specifications used, as can the quality of the aggregates used etc etc!! 😀
Certainly not at Winthorpe – many happy ‘hours’ with a pneumatic drill to put in ‘few’ fence posts; if only the concrete had been 6 inches thick!
The specs for the recently built culvert between the sites and the floor of Hangar 2 were significantly greater than 6 inches of poured concrete!
…. I reckon gone the days when 6in of non-reinforced poured concrete was sufficient….
When was that used??? 😮
NAM Update 09.09.10
A NAM update has just gone live here about: the Night Photo Shoot; the autumn Aeroboot; and Workshop development plans!
🙂 Nice ‘work’ there by that man and (team?) – by the sound of it very rewarding! 🙂
Project Airfix
🙂 Good see some positive engagement with the younger generation http://www.key.aero/view_news.asp?ID=2490&thisSection=airshow
… The Cockpit was ( And still is ) laying on its Port side and is( or was in 1972 ) a really good candidate for Cockpit fest at Newark…..
😀 I’m sure it’d be made very welcome!!
Earlier today the museum underwent its latest ‘secret assessment’ under the Visitor Attraction Quality Assurance Scheme [VAQAS] – the good news is that NAM retained its status as a VAQAS registered site. 🙂
More details here!
You have a PM c/w contact details! 🙂
….. Would be interesting to know where all the components finally ended-up though….
As has been posted before, if you scroll down here you’ll find details of where some bits ended up!