dark light

TwinOtter23

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 5,866 through 5,880 (of 7,125 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Nimrod Museum Allocations #1135182
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Radical thought here – does internet gossip run rife again?

    Does anyone know for certain that RAFM or IWM is not getting one? :confused:

    NAM was forced to issue its statement last October due to internet chatter, hence the careful wording, which still stands!

    in reply to: If a museum isn't for education what is it for? #1899521
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Having briefly met her a couple of times when she was involved in setting up the Galleries of Justice in Nottingham (a very child friendly venue) and through AIMs (Association of Independent Museums); I would venture to suggest that her words were carefully considered and had a specific point to make!

    Children must be encouraged to use museums, but in the right way!

    Perhaps the sign-off on J Boyle’s posts covers it well – “There are two sides to every story. The truth is usually somewhere between the two”.

    in reply to: General Discussion #314496
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Having briefly met her a couple of times when she was involved in setting up the Galleries of Justice in Nottingham (a very child friendly venue) and through AIMs (Association of Independent Museums); I would venture to suggest that her words were carefully considered and had a specific point to make!

    Children must be encouraged to use museums, but in the right way!

    Perhaps the sign-off on J Boyle’s posts covers it well – “There are two sides to every story. The truth is usually somewhere between the two”.

    in reply to: Newark Air Museum Briefing #1135731
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    There is a temporay fix to use the museum website via http://newarkairmuseum.org/

    in reply to: Nimrod Museum Allocations #1135926
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Yes – that’s what everyone thinks at Newark!

    To reiterate another earlier post:

    “However a large ‘airliner style’ airframe has been on the museum acquisition target list for the last 15 years – on the basis of the museum purchasing the item and not taking another airframe on loan.

    There is also a growing sub-theme relating to reconnaissance at the museum and hence the interest in a Nimrod, which would fulfil two aims.”

    in reply to: Nimrod Museum Allocations #1135932
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    As the museum website is still down I’ll re-post the original (and still valid) statement that was issued last October.

    Nimrod R1

    Possible acquisition ……..

    Following reports on some web fora and various direct communications to the museum – the museum trustees would like to confirm that they are in negotiations over the possible acquisition of a Nimrod R1 airframe.

    The museum trustees made the following additional details available at 1430 hours on 28 October, 2009.

    “Newark Air Museum has been given to understand that a Nimrod R1 aircraft will be retired from operational service sometime before the end of this financial year and then potentially dismantled to be sold as scrap. Eager to see this historic and prestigious aircraft preserved instead, initial enquiries have already been made to the RAF into the possible acquisition of this aircraft for display in the Museum, once it has been officially deemed surplus to requirements. It is still too early for the MOD to make any commitment at this time and the exact cost has yet to be established, but we are confidently aspiring to purchase the complete aircraft sometime in 2010.” 😀

    in reply to: Nimrod Museum Allocations #1136039
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    How will the ones for Newark and Elvington be delivered? Are the existing runways suitable for landing a Nimrod?

    If acquired the plan would be for NAM’s to be delivered by road! 😀

    in reply to: Newark Air Museum Briefing #1136074
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Update 26.03.10

    Sorry for the interruption to service on the museum’s website this is due to small technical hitch whilst transferring the site to a new server. Hopefully being resolved as this is typed!

    Below are a couple of updates.

    Nimrod

    Following today’s flurry of Nimrod related news I can confirm that that NAM’s situation still hasn’t changed! 😉

    Tribute to the V-Force

    Earlier this year the museum contacted a variety of media outlets in our quest to contact former V-Force personnel from across the UK to participate in a reunion event that is taking place at Newark Air Museum on Saturday 24th & Sunday 25th April 2010. This campaign has proved to be a great success in many parts of the UK, except that areas closest to home – Lincolnshire, Leicestershire and South Yorks.

    So if you know anyone who was based at …

    RAF Coningsby
    RAF Cottesmore
    RAF Finningley
    RAF Scampton
    RAF Waddington
    RAF Wittering

    … then please ask them to contact the reunion website at http://www.vforcereunion.co.uk

    Don’t forget that the two day event is open to the public. 🙂

    in reply to: Nimrod retirement today – please add pictures #1136387
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Newark’s got lots of airframes to ‘fuss over continuously’ but I’m not so certain about the scantily clad women!!

    The only time that happens is on the occasional ‘Photo Club’ or ‘Product Promotion’ closed door photography sessions – strange thing they don’t struggle for volunteers for any of those events!! 😀

    Happy retirement!!

    in reply to: Nimrod retirement today – please add pictures #1136492
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    The retirement from Kinloss has just featured on the BBC lunchtime news http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8588847.stm

    … a sad day! 😡

    Not enough ‘board memory’ to post any pictures either!! 🙁

    in reply to: Nimrod retirement today – please add pictures #1136623
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    … The fantastic efforts by the folks at Newark and the East Midlands Aero Park show what can be done with a good team but a large aircraft left outside is going to deteriorate unless fussed over continuously by loving carers….

    “Fussed over continuously!” – that sounds like an excellent motto or perhaps even a ‘mission statement’! 😀

    in reply to: 27 Squadron Vulcan Tail art #1137946
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Do you have a reference for the City of Lincoln Crest?

    Would a picture of XM594’s tail section help?

    in reply to: 27 Squadron Vulcan Tail art #1139911
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    I’ve had a quick look through the V-Force Reunion Gallery http://www.vforcereunion.co.uk/gallery.html but couldn’t see anything. You might get a response if you post the questions over on their site! 🙂

    in reply to: Nimrod Museum Allocations #1140347
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    He may well have been, but he wasn’t the person I was thinking of. NAM’s guy is also ex-Shackleton! 😉

    in reply to: Pocket Stealth fighter – asymmetric ace card? #2419220
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    :diablo: Luscombe Rattler Strike – one of the prototypes is displayed at NAM! 😀

Viewing 15 posts - 5,866 through 5,880 (of 7,125 total)