dark light

TwinOtter23

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 6,361 through 6,375 (of 7,125 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Aircraft Cockpit Sections/Instrument Panel Projects #1162162
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    …..The initial stage will be just getting the Flight deck sorted out which I`ll take round to the Cockpit Fest in the next couple of years…..

    😀 Go for it and get yourself on the list http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=89144

    in reply to: Jaguars at RAF Syerston #1162233
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    No, as regards the roads it’s not premptive – it’s all a done deal.

    … The Parliamentary orders were published at the end of January and we received letters through from the Highways Agency telling us we had 30 days from publication to object.

    That was the bit I missed! 😮

    You can’t sell houses in the area but they want to build another 6-10,000. Strikes me as being utterly utterly stupid.

    I agree.

    TT – as for the field craft; survival training and “capture-evasion training” this input came from a partial interview I did with someone from Cranwell about 2 years ago – since moved on and item not published.

    in reply to: Jaguars at RAF Syerston #1162320
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    The future Mrs ZHR is not a happy lady.

    I can imagine!

    The hedge clearing all seems a bit pre-emptive to me – as I understand it is still out for consultation / approval.

    Interesting to note that they’ve taken land on the airfield side rather than the old Officers Mess side at Syerston. I know that this route saves a Lottery funded sports ground; so I guess it wouldn’t have anything to with land owned by any families connected to the current government! :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Jaguars at RAF Syerston #1162685
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    ZHR – I must say I was surprised at how much hedge row and the number of trees being cleared around the Bingham roundabout for the same scheme – or are they also covering for the ‘Eco Town’ at RAF Newton?? 😮

    in reply to: Jaguars at RAF Syerston #1162924
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Not a problem – it took me a couple of ‘search combinations’ to find it.

    I hope that the much needed new road doesn’t curtail activities at Syerston, which have been interesting of late.

    VX927 – not sure about their condition but my understanding is they have varied uses; including field craft; survival training and “capture-evasion training” – almost back to some of the wartime training carried out there.

    in reply to: Jaguars at RAF Syerston #1162968
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    A little bit more information here http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showpost.php?p=1032254&postcount=12 🙂

    What I also noticed when passing Syerston today was that a large swathe of trees has been chopped down to accommodate the widening of the A46, which seems to go across one of the runway thresholds!

    in reply to: Vulcan XM575 Restoration News #1163124
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    well depends if the crew get a pee break or not or do they have to stay in the cockpit for 16 hrs LOL

    I was talking about on the original Ops – the ‘additional free-standing mod’ was referred to at a talk given last year by John Laycock! 😮

    in reply to: Vulcan XM575 Restoration News #1163662
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    :diablo: Ah, but what about top secret mod ….
    No.2s free standing Elsan???? 😉 :diablo:

    in reply to: Vulcan XM575 Restoration News #1163676
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    ?????

    Peter,

    Probably being sponsored to stay inside the aircraft for 16 hours [length of time airborne for the Black Buck Raids!??!] to raise money for Comic Relief [a national / international fund raising campaign held yesterday in UK].

    :diablo: It’s a British thing!!!:diablo:

    :diablo: = the closest I could get to a ‘red nose’

    Peter, a Red Nose is one of the Comic Relief symbols!

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/nottingham/comic_relief/

    in reply to: Crashed Aeroplanes – War Graves – Time Team #1164200
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Perhaps going slightly off topic – but I feel that it is nevertheless worthwhile remembering that in the Netherlands their national statutes make it the responsibility of the local authorities to fund the recovery of such wartime sites.

    As such I understand that local residents also pay a small annual levy as part of their ‘local council tax’ to fund such excavations in their area, should the need arise. If there is insufficient funding, then the government normally steps in.

    I was unaware of this until it was explained to me last autumn by a member of the Royal Netherlands Air Force Recovery Team, whilst discussing a potential and now ‘active’ World War II investigation.

    As far as I’m aware no such formal funding is forthcoming here in the UK, which perhaps reflects our nation’s attitude to such matters.

    in reply to: Is Concorde really a "British" design? (2009 thread) #1164958
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    When you look at the two MiGs at Newark [similar base airframes but different roles] you get a good insight into the Russian design philosophy – and IMHO you certainly wouldn’t say that they were in any way into ‘over engineering’ like some ‘western designs’.

    You need a variable shaped air intake – three pull rod linkages will do!

    Pilot protection required for a ground attack role – bolt on some extra armour plating to the fuselage side!

    A bit heavy to take-off – put in a bigger engine!

    Apparently a bit basic – but perhaps effective and functional! :diablo:

    http://www.newarkairmuseum.org/aircraftlist.htm

    in reply to: Is Concorde really a "British" design? (2009 thread) #1165463
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    One thing that’s perhaps been overlooked is the ‘step-change’ in technology required to get Concorde operational and the benefits that effort brought to British industry.

    The member’s newsletter at Newark has just finished running an article by the ex Chief Development Engineer of Dowty Boulton Paul, about that company’s involvement in part of the Concorde development programme.

    I was enlightened by their involvement and this comment by Terry Herrington summed up a lot of that effort:

    “Being involved with Concorde from its conception to when it was withdrawn from service in October 2003, although at times giving me some headaches, has been one of the highlights of my career….”

    We need more manufacturing to help get out of this current financial mess!!

    in reply to: Buccaneer Pics #1172775
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    XN964 was part of the former Loughborough & Leicestershire Air Museum and spent a brief time with them at both East Midlands Airport and Bruntingthorpe. It was then purchased by Newark.

    The recent restoration has been brilliant with hundreds of hours of work involved in removing a former ‘protective varnish’ that had broken down. Many of the volunteers that did the work are now working on the Sea Vixen and Meteor NF14. 🙂

    http://www.newarkairmuseum.org/aircraftlist.htm

    in reply to: Buccaneer Pics #1173319
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Inspired by the MARTSU pictures S1 XN964 enroute from Bruntingthorpe via Leicester to Newark, early one Sunday morning – March 13th 1988!

    in reply to: Buccaneer Pics #1173404
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Newark’s S1 XN964 – taken at one of these events http://www.newarkairmuseum.org/newsItem.php?id=60

Viewing 15 posts - 6,361 through 6,375 (of 7,125 total)