You could also check out what’s available here at the end of February…. http://www.newarkairmuseum.org/newsItem.php?id=58 😀
My understanding was that the proposal for the aircraft was possibly disposal by ‘non-sale’ means!
As I understand it several places have been contacted about these airframes! 😉
Why so confrontational though?
.. there’s an awful lot of people on the internet that talk a load of rubbish!
Yes!
Wouldn’t you love to tell the person responsible for the ridiculous “gate guard” ruling precisely what you thought of him? I know I would!
No!
Chox, how many fora did you say you’d fallen out with? :rolleyes:
Whilst an interesting comparison IMHO I do not believe that both the A1 and the Vulcan project are wholly comparable.
I also seem to recollect [despite a quick search I cannot find any mention of this] that the A1 project has had its own ‘issues’ along the way. Plus the original target completion date was 1995…. http://www.a1steam.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=87%3Anew-steam-locomotive-project-to-hold-second-road-show-in-farnborough&Itemid=124
… that might explain the beer price of £1.25. 😀
However, whatever way you call it the A1 is another great British achievement. All preservation sectors can learn from one another and should be encouraged to do so!
According to the Newark website the February event is now over a third-sold; 14 tables out of 35. http://www.newarkairmuseum.org/newsItem.php?id=58
Zoot,
Some relevant questions but I don’t have the answers.
Charity Accounting is now covered by a regulation called SORP; if you have the time this link and the links therein may help you understand a little more
http://www.charity-commission.gov.uk/investigations/sorp/sorpfront.asp
Twinotter – firstly, my comment regarding HLF was simply referring to their standard practise of claiming that they cannot discuss the precise details of communications which have taken place between the two parties. Ultimately, you have to discuss concepts in abstract terms in order to get any sense out of them.
It’s called ‘commercial confidentiality’, which is what arises when you have a contract between two parties, publically funded or otherwise.
As for the consultancy rate, I would never presume to comment about an individuals worth on a public forum, I was merely highlighting the current ‘going rate!’
Naturally, TVOC and HLF both say that this wouldn’t be possible, but then they would, wouldn’t they….
Chox,
Leaving aside the preamble – that sounds like criticism of HLF to me!
Another interesting thought to ponder. Yesterday I received 4 quotations for museum related consultancy work and the average cost for one day [including expenses] was £600 + VAT i.e. circa 100 days consultancy for £60k [depending how you cover the VAT].
Chox,
Whilst I’ve also been a project doubter I think that you’re last post is disingenuous to HLF for the support that they’ve given to this and other aviation projects.
Where’s the logic in then proposing to move the aircraft to the USA, as I would suspect that such a move would cause the HLF to draw some of their funding back!
However, it would be interesting to know the ongoing time frame that the HLF – TVOC contract works to.
Or, purchase this field here, and build a facility big enough to become the RAF Museum of Air Transport – a safe home for a C-130, Lyneham’s Comet, a VC10. Repositioning of suitable (movable) airframes would then free up space for future arrivals at Cosford (Nimrod) etc.
If only it was that easy!
Some one was lining that up for Driffield! 😀
Sorry TT, I couldn’t resist!! TO23 😀
Talk of putting a K Herc in the RAF museum’s collection (we’ll need to think of saving a Nimrod and VC10 soon also) makes me think – where are they going to put them? Time to allocate another airfield methinks.
:diablo: Scampton!! 😀
Have you tried searching the websites / catalogues of the auction houses?
You might get an idea of reserve prices; whether or not an item was sold, or not; etc etc.