dark light

TwinOtter23

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 6,496 through 6,510 (of 7,125 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Plastic Model Kits #225187
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Have you seen any increase in the recent price of plastic kits and accessories?

    I noticed this on Newark’s website earlier today http://www.newarkairmuseum.org/newsItem.php?id=67

    in reply to: Canadian Museum's Hampden Damaged by Snow Fall #1174862
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Sounds just like the voluntary museum sector in the UK! :rolleyes:

    Keep up the hard work everyone!! 🙂

    in reply to: Aircraft Cockpit Sections/Instrument Panel Projects #1176122
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    XM692 just beat me to it! 🙂

    Some people belong to this group http://www.internationalcockpitclub.org.uk/

    And some people display them at events like this http://www.newarkairmuseum.org/newsItem.php?id=39

    in reply to: Top Five Most Significant UK Aircraft Types #1176460
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    1 Venom
    2 Sea Venom
    3 Night Venom
    4 Export Venom
    5 Vampire

    You know why!!;)

    And now I’m off to brush up on my Cold War history, of which I have so little grasp after being an integral part of it for 30 odd years.:D

    Happy New Year

    (Look forward to reading some more meaningful and interesting replies).

    😀 😀 Brilliant – even better than trying to find and ‘Prune’ Lightning negatives! :diablo:

    We’ve got two ‘National Benchmark Venoms’ where I volunteer; although Bruce might know where they have more.

    http://www.newarkairmuseum.org/aircraftlist.htm

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1176620
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Oh dear – we’re getting very petty aren’t we ladies?

    You always do!

    In my mind ‘selective debate’ case proven!

    One final piece of advice if you’re so sure of your case against individuals at Bruntingthorpe then complain to the Charity Commission.

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1176777
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Chox – How can you state that something was an outstanding success if it was never used?

    IMHO ‘selective debate’, i.e. move the subject on when answers are provided.

    Also, no book on the Venom to get pictures for and a Vulcan one to promote! 😀

    Just off to look for my 1973 Lightning pictures from a school visit to Binbrook, Happy New Year. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1177616
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    I note from the trust annual accounts that the HLF retain a charge over XH558 to the value of their grant and I suspect the HLF might have the final say on whether she went across the Atlantic.

    Thanks Z H R,

    Whilst I’ve taken a cursory glance at the accounts via the Charity Commission website I’d missed that point.

    I know from the evaluation forms that I continue to fill in, that the HLF will try to maintain a check that you are meeting all your contract obligations and reporting requirements.

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1178708
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Chox,

    I presume that you’ve never seen a HLF Contract, let alone signed one!

    Before you ask, yes I have [on both counts] and ironically it was with the same HLF Team that is [was] running the Vulcan Project. They are a very supportive team of people, hence my disappointment at your earlier negative comments about them.

    With a successful HLF application the performance targets and reporting requirements [about how you are achieving the stated aims of the Bid] typically go on for the duration of the contract; they can be onerous and can include the reclamation of some or the entire grant if you do not meet your targets.

    One interesting statement from the HLF at the BAPC 40th Anniversary event in 2007, related to their main involvement and success of the project being “to get the aircraft airborne”; the same person also stated that HLF was extremely unlikely to ever support another ‘flying project’.

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1179828
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Chox – please read post #1265 from December 18th! :confused:

    in reply to: Decline of the Vampire T.11 #1180548
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Good starter airframe for many collections, but also a type of construction that highlights the importance of getting airframes under cover.

    I guess a similar theme will eventually follow with the American loaned airframes.

    My suggestion would be that they enabled groups to get established, which ultimately could lead to other important types being saved! 🙂

    in reply to: Aircraft for sale #1180890
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    I understand in the true spirit of co-operation that these two aircraft were offered to other museums via BAPC E-Groups last week; before they appeared on the web. Good luck with the move! 🙂

    in reply to: Parts valuation #1181852
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Elliott, you could always bring them along and get them valued, or possibly trade with them here in the New Year http://www.newarkairmuseum.org/newsItem.php?id=58

    in reply to: Spitfire – 'Data plate specials' #1184229
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    Would anyone have ‘Jenkinson’s classifications’?

    That might be informative…

    Bruce

    Nearest I’ve got so far http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denis_Jenkinson

    Personally I find the paper trails involved in these cases far more interesting.

    in reply to: 748s to the smelter #1184730
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    I think the silence might indicate that these are not yet a lost cause! 😉

    in reply to: Snoopy flies #1185852
    TwinOtter23
    Participant

    One of the good things about the Museum Registration / Accreditation process is that to be part of the system a Museum has to have an acceptable Collection & Disposal Policy.

    Yes there was a phase of ‘grab anything’ and that helped a lot of items survive but the latest accepted collection & disposal standards are far more onerous and I believe that you will see more considered acquisitions and possible disposals in the future.

    Remember, without being Registered or Accredited it is unlikely that you’ll secure any funding for any major capital projects – especially those aimed at getting airframes inside.

Viewing 15 posts - 6,496 through 6,510 (of 7,125 total)