I recently learned that F-15 has CLmax = 1.6 at 40 degrees AoA too ( very surprising TBH)


https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/87983main_H-1243.pdf

earlier specification of Su-27SM.

http://www.flankers-site.co.uk/mos2005_day02.html

And that prove what ? where exactly it say Su-27SM has better range and combat radius than Su-35S ?

still more than you

And can you find anyone to vote for that statement ? Or better yes , can you find anyone that doesnot think you are a troll ?

Suddenly it’s 1,500? Where do you get that figure from?

From lolek post at the start

Of course they do

Do we know what radar or IRST that Mig-35 version will use ?

Can’t see how..

I would guess it due to structure strength needed or stuff like that .

F-35 requires a certain amount of fuel as heat dump, that can never be assumed,
like a mig-21 model that had to keep some fuel for balance, -dead weight

Unusable fuel is included in aircraft empty weight AFAIK.
Anyways , i dont think F-35 is the only aircraft that need heat dump for avionics

It’s very specific to MIG35

Sure because Mig-35 use Russian magic physics while others aircrafts have to obey normal physics

Su-27SM is not Su-27S. Try to read with attention

So what is combat radius of Su-27SM vs Su-35S then , troll ?

I know what I know.

Which is absolutely nothing

I’m afraid that 4500km is for Su-35S equipped with two 2000l drop tanks. Without it the most common values are around 3600km.

Su-27 cant carry EFT ?.
I have found that figures for Su-27 ferry range varied alot too TBH.

from engine upgrades MIG-29OVT will outperform MIG-29A in all flight regimes. and MIG-35 will outperform MIG-29OVT. there shouldn’t be any doubt about it

Absolute moronic beyond words.
Using your logic all aircraft will out perfrom their previous block on all flight regimes because they will always get a more powerful engine overtime

nope. Su-27SM more radi

Su-27S ferry range is 3700 km
Su-35 ferry range is 4500 km

the point of advance weopons is not export but squeeze money out of others. see Turkey business behavior after S400 in Syria. A country that can drill ground efficiently will have no problem with exports . I am sure once they see T-50 practically in Middleast there behavior will further change. the Syrian base is going to upgrade for 200 combat aircraft.
http://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Russia-And-Iran-Sign-Flurry-Of-Energy-Deals-Whats-Next.html
but more important than exports is application of military power and the money flows to banks automatically. I put emphasis on word advance as you don’t have understanding of technology.

Your obliviousness to irony is strong

Actually, from my memory, the Su-27SM upgrade has resulted in decreased weight of the avionics

I dont know specific about every single block but Su-35 empty weight is 18400 kg while Su-27 empty weight is 16380 kg , that is about 2000 kg different

For the carrierborne version, yes

The land borne version is 700 Kg heavier according to him, but iam not sure how many land version will be bought. Could be none

The question is, however, what is the commonality of airframes of MiG-29K/KUB and MiG-35/35D

Hard to speculate if there is no order yet.

That’s really a marginal difference

A different nontheless

Yes, because the MiG-35 has got the carrierborne wing, only without wingfold, AFAIK..

I recall that Mig-29 carrier version can fold its wing back , so Mig-35 lose that capabilities ??