Correct.
Over here, we are corrupted by Western Propaganda which of course always states how bad the other guy is and how good the Western stuff is.
It is only since the Berlin Wall came down – and ruined the whole Defence industry – that the West has actually gained any significant lead against the Soviets.
If the wall hadn’t come down and Russia had continued with it’s old defence policy, it would be ahead still.
Some of the greatest scientists on the planet were involved in the Soviet Defence work, do you think they made products that would not do the job?
It was the west that was always chasing to get a product that would overmatch the latest Soviet threat. Russia kept making stuff, the West made something to beat it. Never the other way round.
1st Satellite, 1st man in space (Met him as he toured the factory I used to work at), 1st spacewalk. It was only at this point that JFK decided to pump Gazzillions of dollars into the US space race that this possible threat was overmatched.
I wish it was still like that, because our defence spending and our defence force would actually be superb, all the research and employment would return.
As it is, we cannot justify more than a few air and a few less sea platforms and as soon as we want to replace a Submarine, the pinko’s are actually allowed to have a say. They’d sooner spend the money on a new town twinning campaign.
That and other crappy pinko stuff like infrastucture, schools and hospitals…
DEFINITELY ……. a Lightning!!!!!!!!
It’s really not clear to me what the question is here.
The one thing I can’t see having changed since the Cold War is the idea of deterrence – so, to that extent, sealordlawrence has said it all with his Trident comment.
The Atlantic (or any other) exercises are a total irrelevance. The whole world knows that nobody is lining up to attack Russia and that all this arrant nonsense is just for gullible Russian public opinion.
The Russians, similarly, aren’t about to mount a conventional, seaborne invasion of the UK, US or wherever.
I imagine most western military strategists are observing the whole thing with a degree of amused detachment – as, quite likely, is Putin himself.
It’s a publicity stunt.
Oh come off it you lot, we all know which one we’d really like to see:
Ooh goody!
Maybe we’ll see them back at Kemble!!
The Soviets were well rehearsed for nuclear wars to last 5-7 years and to not only survive but perform in massive maneuvers with their surviving air, land, and sea forces across the globe. So I’d say your analysis was vaguely shallow.
There’s nothing shallow about electromagnetic destruction of your gadgetry nor of the mass death of your infantry and armored brigades through the use of enhanced radiation weapons.
‘Surviving forces’, it might just be worth noting, would have been far keener on abandoning their posts and spending a last few hours with their families rather than playing ‘whose plane looks cooler’ with the opposition over an uninhabitable Europe.
Armageddon is just that – armageddon. Not a place for boys and their toys…
Somehow my memory must be playing me tricks.
The Mirage IV was actually a front line bird and the TSR2 made it well past the drawing board, no?
Where’s the ‘what if’ in all this?
If the thread is meant to relate to Warsaw Pact vs Nato in continental Europe, the whole debate about which aircraft would have done ‘well’ or ‘badly’ is a monumental absurdity.
It was a well-known and little disguised feature of the conventional forces imbalance that Nato would have had to ‘go nuclear’ at a very early stage of any Soviet invasion.
Not much point in running sorties of any kind, offensive or defensive, through a radiation soup, with EMP knocking out most of your systems every few minutes…
That ‘analysis’ deep enough for you?
It was meant to be ironic, friend!
Er…
…. anyone got an artist’s impression of the P1154?
Yep, difficult to believe – a supersonic VSTOL fighter in planning 45 years ago…
Problems and difficulties tend to be insurmountable.
Truths, on the other hand, tend to be undeniable or irrefutable – unless of course you come from the same school that turned out such worthies as Osama Bin Laden and GW Bush…
I’d go for the Lightning, as per the OP… if only to sample the climb rate…
… and I still reckon this 50 year old design would push many modern birds beyond breaking point in that particular area…
I have no axe to grind against the Hawk, despite posting a thread some time ago which debated whether the design was now ageing.
It seems to me to be a tried and tested beast and merits its place amongst the world’s top trainers.
India could scarcely do better.
Before we all get carried away in defending dear Dunc, let’s not forget that here was a Conservative politician doing what was basically an inept job.
I’ve seen enough anti-Labour vitriol on these pages for programme cancellations and poor decision making, much of it duly deserved, and so I believe that a touch of balance should be restored.
While we’re at it, let’s also recall what a hash dear Maggie was making of defence matters when the forces rode, no thanks to her or Knotty, to their rescue.
Always bear in mind that much revered old maxim which I’ve just invented: we all make mistakes – and politicians (of ALL colours) represent us in that area particularly well…
Off topic, I know, but pics like these remind me of how truly gobsmacking a design this bird was. Stunning.