Oh, I am so surprised…
Ironic that it was an Emirates flight really, up until a few years ago I dont believe you could get a drink at all on any of their services, I think it is just limited to inter-middle east flights currently?
Very very good!
Get used to it is all I can say. I’m sure all the other photographers on here who do, or ever have uploaded (or attempted to upload) their photographs will agree with me in saying that 50% of the time, the decision to accept a photo can come down to what side of the bed the screener got out of in the morning.
In fairness the scope for inconsistency is very high, given the number of photographs that are screened over a relatively short period of time, and even the best get photos rejected for obscure and ultimatley false reasons.
Sadly not really. The only time they ever come in is when Putin comes to visit, as he has one as part of his entourage.
Someone was paying attention to that Red Arrows programme last night đ
I think Mach 0.886 is typical maximum cruising speed in the VC10, not necessarily the structural maximum speed. Those Boeing figures are Maximum Airframe Limit speeds I guess?
Which one was it, I cant quite read the reg? Unbelievably they actualy have 4 747-400s, not to mention the 2 SPs and a whole host of 737 BBJs!
26/08/2006 Catania Fontanarossa â Milan Malpensa
After an amazing two weeks in Sicily, it was back to Catania. An 8am start for an 1150 flight was not popular, particularly when after arriving at 1000 we found a 3 hour delay to the flight, pushing it back to 1440. After joining another Sicilian âQueuing Systemâ we were checked in for the late flight, and told that we would not make our connection to LHR, and again, the next flight they could get us on wasnât until 2035 out of MXP. Once again however compensation was offered, in the form of a Business Class upgrade on the MXP-LHR sector for all 6 of us!
We were advised that airside was very sparse at CTA, and so we remained landside until half an hour before the flight. We were also given access to the Alitalia lounge, however it was absolutely tiny! 3 sofas and 2 tables, even smaller than my living room! Getting a seat was impossible, and there was nothing to do in there anyway, so we sat upstairs on the balcony overlooking the check in hall, playing card games and eating lunch with our once again freely provided meal vouchers again:

Finally it was time to go through security, and after more queuing we boarded I-BIXF, an Airbus A321. Half an hour was further added to the delay due to problems with the air conditioning, but finally we were underway, climbing out over Catania, with a small glimpse of part of Mount Etna to the left:

After a drink and a biscuit we were soon over the Lakes, and making our way into Milan. Two floating attempts, and then a good side-swipe touchdown ensued, and we then came to a rapid stop, pulling up to the gate at Malpensa.
26/08/2006 Milan Malpensa â London Heathrow
After transiting between Pier A to Pier B through passport control, we made our way to the Alitalia lounge, which was thankfully deserted. Although it was slightly less well equipped than the BA lounges, it was still nice to have some comfy seats, free drinks, and some nibbles to keep us comfortable for 3.5 hours before our flight to London.
The time soon passed, and we made our way down to the bus gate. There we were greeted by officials in rubber gloves, telling us there was an EU wide ban on liquids on board aircraft, and we had to surrender everything. Slightly strange given the same airline had said nothing of this fact earlier on in the day at Catania, not only in the EU, but also the same country! In any case they werenât doing a very good job of it, and didnât bother checking half our bags which had several bottles of water in!
After a short drive across the ramp we boarded another A321, I-BIXD, and I took my seat right at the very front of the aircraft in row 2, and had both A and C seats to myself. We had a short wait for someones bags to be offloaded, and departed out into a spectacular thunderstorm. We were treated to some mild turbulence, but an absolutely fantastic light display in two large towering cumulo nimbus clouds to our starboard side, totally illuminating the clouds in their entirety with every flash. It was something I had never seen before, and I only wish I had been able to get a photo.
After 20 minutes or so the turbulence ended, and the service began. My Mum and my Sister got very excited when the Chief Steward put his hat on to serve us dinner! In any case the dinner was very nice indeed, a platter of cured meats and salad to start, chicken risotto for the main course, and a fruit salad for dessert. As well as that there were numerous drinks services made.
In far too short a period of time we were making our approach into Heathrow, and despite a very violent patch of turbulence for a few minutes, we touched down smoothly back on 27L. After being the first passenger to disembark the aircraft (a first for me!) we waited for about half an hour for our luggage, before heading home, thankfully with all 6 pieces!
Conclusion
It is clear to see why Alitalia is losing money. It has a proactive marketing department getting bums on seats with low fares, but the infrastructure of the entire operation cannot keep up, to the extent that they have to spend more money rectifying all the problems that occur. The security situation cannot have helped, but overbooking a flight to Italy on a Saturday is just asking for trouble! However the service end of the airline was extremely professional. Every single person we encountered went out of their way to help us and make us more comfortable, and it is that element of an airline that always makes you want to fly them again.
Despite all the problems we have, I was still left with an overly favourable impression of Alitalia, and will have no hesitation in flying with them again if I get the chance.
Not entirely sure what Bhoy’s response was in answer to…
It varies depending on hte destination, the airline, and the timezones. Where an airline has a lot of flights to a particular destination, say BA to JFK, then the crew will only stay in New York for one day, before returning home. However a flight to say San Francisco might entail a night stop of two days, due to the large timezone difference.
However if the flight is to a more obscure destination, say Virgin Atlantic to Nassau, where there is only one flight a week, then the crew will stay in Nassau for the whole week.
Gatwick is looking OK mate. How did your sister get on with getting up from LHR today?
Does anyone, for example, think its reasonable to put car keys in checked bags just because there’s a remote in the key?
Yes. Some electronic key fobs are quite large, and could quite easily be modified to contain a remote detonator. I cant see it lasting very long, but where there is a very specific threat (as there is today) it seems “reasonable” if not then certainly “justifiable”.
The US seem to be cracking down on bits and pieces that are coming through from the UK, the one that that they are paying particular attention to is liquids on board. Of course its only 6am in NYC currently, so don’t expect any strong guidance until later on in the day when they get a chance to fully react to the situation in the UK.
yep, it’s the Boeing house colours.
So why would an airline want to be promoting the Boeing house colours? Obviously they’re being paid (or at least got a massive discount on the purchase of the airframe), but who are Boeing really trying to market it at?
It was originally placed on a Korean Air 737-900 that was exhibited at Farnborough 2004 in order to promote the 787 Dreamliner. The continuation of random placements of the scheme on other carriers aircraft seems to be nothing more than a global marketing campaign to highlight the 787.
Exactly who it is being marketed at does seem something of a mystery though, as 99.9% of the passengers going on the aircraft wont even notice it let alone understand what it depicts.
Hmm, I’m slightly surprised they went for this and not for the old Centralwings success of Warsaw. I’m not complaining though, I’m sure they will fill the flights as did Centralwings.
Krakow is a lovely city as well, so it will possibly appeal slightly more to Leeds based pax as a tourist destination than Warsaw maybe would have done, particularly as the timings are a lot more sociable!
Biggest maybe, but as neither is government owned, neither can be described as ‘national’.
1L.
Neither? I think you will find Aer Lingus still is?