In my book it is perfectly acceptable to like the XVIII, however I would like to point out that it is really better looking with the original XIV rudder. More analogous to the Genesis situation…
So you are saying it is a Trick of the Tail? 😀
The ‘rectangular’ windows had rounded corners, which should have reduced the stress issues. As noted above, it was not a passenger window that failed.
Did RAF Milltown have an ‘Area 51’? 🙂
Very true … possibly 🙂
There is a 3-blade prop outside the ATC in Dunblane, near Stirling. From memory, the plaque next to it stated it was from a Barracuda that had crashed in the Forth. Seems a bit suspect.
Very … Barracudas had 4 blades.
Lancaster in Whixhall Moss … or is it the mere at Ellesmere?!
RIP to another hero.
His book was a fascinating insight.
Like! :eagerness:
RIP and Thankyou.
Halifax chair.
A WWII airborne dentists chair? 🙂
Thanks for the info 🙂
Indeed, glad it was only metal that got hurt.
Will that be repaired with all new sections or are there serviceable / restorable sections kicking around?
I wonder why most of the prop-driven aircraft have their prop blades in the feather position, maybe something to do with their removal and refitting, perhaps? You could ask the question if you are going back there.
Anon.
Is it as simple as avoiding any tendency to ‘windmill’ ?
Morgan as the largest British-owned manufacturer?
Aston Martin.
It’s not exactly ancient and it’s not a monument. Am I missing something here?
The term, whilst misleading, does afford a better degree of protection to historical artefacts; aside from the obvious such as Stonehenge, the same status is given to (for instance) Meldon Viaduct in North Devon and nearer to my home, Wynnstay Colliery winding house, near Wrexham. Rightly so in my humble opinion.