dark light

Hotshot

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 901 through 915 (of 1,028 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (3) #2247690
    Hotshot
    Participant

    I don’t know but maybe an F-35 would be able to defeat the LPI radar mode of another F-35, if it knows how it works in detail.

    And I wouldn’t give the full capabilities to the turkish F-35s…

    in reply to: Bunker buster bomb, what if the bunker made from metal #2247692
    Hotshot
    Participant

    I wonder, would it be possible to use an active protection system like on tanks to detonate the warhead before it impacts.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (3) #2249831
    Hotshot
    Participant

    Just saw a video with external AMRAAMs in the simulator:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K84f81KvOKQ

    at 30:00.

    in reply to: Fighter radar used as counter battery radar? #2250081
    Hotshot
    Participant

    I think it was a project to replace the vulcan rear cannon with Stingers ATAM.

    1Saludo

    What I read was a new project, and it was not a stinger. Perhaps the AIM-9 I don’t remember, I was rather surprised when I read that.

    in reply to: Fighter radar used as counter battery radar? #2250375
    Hotshot
    Participant

    That would make sense if it is possible.

    Or perhaps the AWACS could be armed with AMRAAMs for self protection if they can really intercept long range SAMs. I think I read the B-52s are going to be armed with AAMs, I don’t think it is the AMRAAM, I don’t remember.

    in reply to: Fighter radar used as counter battery radar? #2250483
    Hotshot
    Participant

    They use Supersonic SAMs as target simulators too, though they are of course quite a bit larger than ATGMs.

    http://militaryforces.ru/weapon-9-101-705.html

    Something like this simulates rocket artillery fairly well for example:
    http://militaryforces.ru/weapon-9-101-708.html

    These missiles are big, 300kg and 600kg, and they are used as targets for missiles whose role is to intercept ballistic missiles.

    So I am not sure a missile like an AMRAAM or meteor would be able to intercept a SAM. If they can intercept large SAMs like the S-300 or S-400 however, it could be a good idea to protect the tankers and AWACS with fighters capable of shooting them down. It would be hard to be sure that all the launchers have been destroyed, the tankers and AWACS could get closer.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (3) #2250695
    Hotshot
    Participant

    Correct me if I’m wrong (and I’m sure someone will), but like Halloweene said, isn’t EOTS basically Sniper XR in a stealthy housing?

    It’s improved upon the sniper XR. I don’t remember exactly the weight but it is relatively light. I read a more powerful version of the EOTS will be developed within the next few years.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (3) #2250697
    Hotshot
    Participant

    This is why you have fusion. Fusion give you the accuracy to know where to look that would have been detrimental on dyn perfs if achieved with on-board sensor only.

    Fusion is directed by the headset: look, refresh, acquire. Obviously there should be some kind of limitations (bandwidth, secure com etc…) but the idea is there (my guess).

    The F-35 will probably be better that older planes at finding vehicles on the grounds, but I am skeptical it would be better to find dismounted troops, which is important for CAS.

    EASA radars have the ability to emit in very precise direction, so perhaps the F-35 can scan a certain area to find vehicles. If something of interest is found, the EOTS can be cued for identification and tracking. I guess all that is done automatically by the fusion sensor.

    in reply to: Fighter radar used as counter battery radar? #2250699
    Hotshot
    Participant

    JSTARS and AWACS could both geolocate artillery. It’s not finding the artillery when it’s hot, it’s finding it on the move.

    I wonder if a fighter with advanced sensors could do that too.

    I doubt it would be possible to bring the JSTARS a AWACS close in an high intensity scenario, the fighters should have the ability to do that themselves if possible. That’s the kind of things that the F-35 should be able to do, it should be an order of magnitude better than the old generation at finding targets on the ground. It should use all sorts of tricks with its advanced sensors and sensor fusion to be able to do that. Using the F-35 for pure CAS instead would be a waste of ressources.

    in reply to: Fighter radar used as counter battery radar? #2250701
    Hotshot
    Participant

    ATGWs fly a few hundred miles per hour. Shouldn’t be too difficult to acquire, track, and engage.

    I guess so but I think that active protection systems are more cost effective, because you don’t need a dedicated ADS system.

    I wonder if tanks will have all aspect IR sensors like the F-35’s DAS in the future. With such systems they could detect ATGM launches and fire anti-ATGM missiles. Also the tank turret and sensors would be automatically cued to what the IR warning system detected for identification and tracking. That would be effective against ATGM teams.

    in reply to: Fighter radar used as counter battery radar? #2250706
    Hotshot
    Participant

    Russian AD crews shoot down small targets like Falanga in training- and I am not talking about huge vehicle complexes, but smaller army AD vehicles.

    It is possible.

    EDIT: Or was it Malutka? I don’t remember, but one very small anti-tank missile.

    I think Levsha was talking about intercepting a SAM, which would be much harder I think than a subsonic missile.

    in reply to: Fighter radar used as counter battery radar? #2250853
    Hotshot
    Participant

    what i meant was, read up on such a unit and see what can be expected and done,
    using similar sized hardware
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARTHUR_%28radar%29

    It says that it works in C band, which is next to the X band, so perhaps it works for a fighter radar which usually works in the X band.

    Using a fighter radar versus a ground radar for that role reduces the probability of counter attack.

    I guess that it might be possible also for the fighter to emit above the horizon, in order to reduce the probability of being detected by the enemy ESM. It would still detect the shells and rockets I think.

    in reply to: Fighter radar used as counter battery radar? #2250860
    Hotshot
    Participant

    artillery localization radar
    http://smartdata.usbid.com/datasheets/usbid/2000/2000-q4/990427.pdf

    I know that counter artillery radars exist, I was just wondering if fighter radars could be used for that, like an AESA radar.

    in reply to: Fighter radar used as counter battery radar? #2250864
    Hotshot
    Participant

    A radar with a fast processor speed, a modern AESA type radar? I don’t doubt that the technology (if not the radar) already exists. A more pertinent question is: could the same fighter then fire a missile to shoot down the oncoming missile – and in the process protecting itself from enemy ground fire? Can AIM-120D or Meteor shoot down AD missiles?

    I was talking more about detecting 155mm rounds and rockets.

    I don’t know if an AMRAAM or meteor can shoot an SAM. Maybe they can but it would have to maneuver very quickly after launch. And the interception is probably very hard because the missiles are moving so fast.

    I’ve read that the successor of the sidewinder is supposed to have anti-missile capability. I don”t remember the name but iut’s probably the SACM.

    When you look at the IronDome weapon system, you realize that intercepting a small missile or rocket is very difficult, although not impossible.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (3) #2250877
    Hotshot
    Participant

    As a sniper pod will beinternally integrated, i do not see where is the issue. (Notice for once i talk in favour of F-35).

    The F-35 has its EOTS obviously but it is directional, whereas the DAS is an all aspect sensor. For instance it can detect missiles firing or artillery firing like AAA, at a certain distance at least. Then the EOTS can be automatically cued and the target can be engaged quickly. That is pretty good but it doesn’t work against enemy dismounted troops because the DAS doesn’t have enough range to detect small arms fire. The EOTS can be used only if you know where to look, like for any other plane.

    Question about EOTS btw, doese it have moving ground targets detection capability?

    It can track moving targets. Detect moving target, I don’t know but I kind of I doubt it, you have to tell it where to look, except in IRST search mode I guess. The radar or other means would be used for detection, not sure.

Viewing 15 posts - 901 through 915 (of 1,028 total)