dark light

ericmunk

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 1,519 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: WW II Propellor ID from Dutch crash site #848064
    ericmunk
    Participant

    He 111 i would say

    A more precize location would help narrowing it down to a particular aircraft. I agree it looks He111, but the only aircraft downed at Voorburg apparently were a Blenheim and Ju52. So how ‘near’ was ‘near Voorburg’?

    in reply to: Help please with i.d. of a few relics #848459
    ericmunk
    Participant

    AHA! There it is. British Patent 480082 (1937) refers to Dannert wire. An oil-tempered barbed wire developed during WW1. Much harder to cut than
    ordinary barbed wire. Ironically, it was German national Horst Dannert who developed this wire into self-supporting concertinas. An individual Dannert wire concertina was compressable as a one-man-carried-coil and capable of stretching to 50 feet using only three fixations.

    in reply to: Help please with i.d. of a few relics #848467
    ericmunk
    Participant

    The Rendan tag does not seem to be aviation related per se. See http://pillboxesinsuffolk.blogspot.nl/2010_05_01_archive.html (24 May 2010) and http://www.metaldetectingforum.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=121&t=33495 describing similar finds. The company was amongst other things known for making barbed wire and held several patents for this.

    ericmunk
    Participant

    ‘100yds offshore’ – was likely to have been destroyed by sea action within days I would have thought?
    http://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/wiki.php?id=18835

    I seem to recall the wreck was pulled onto the beach shortly after and broken up for scrap. I have seen pictures somewhere, but am unable to find them.

    in reply to: B-25 being prepared to move to Australia #850741
    ericmunk
    Participant

    Reevers is looking to repaint our B-25 Mitchell “Lucky Lady” into an appropriate B-25 NEIAF / Netherlands East Indies Air Force WW2 colour scheme. See more at the link – https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=432731983571669

    or if not on facebook send us a message if you know of anything that could be suitable.

    Try the Duke of Brabant Air Force crew. They did extensive research into 18 Sq schemes before picking their current scheme for their B-25. There are a lot of other 18Sq aircraft with names, characters, etc. Certainly makes for the more unusual schemes, and very relevant to Oz.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2015) #851781
    ericmunk
    Participant

    How does the Wildcat start?

    Reluctantly.

    in reply to: Buried aircraft #853248
    ericmunk
    Participant

    There must be many of these buried-aircraft-places. Nearby Schiphol has a few pits which apparently were filled in with the remains of the May 1940 bombardments. Interesting mix of aircraft (parts) and UXB’s. Nobody has dug them yet, understandably!

    in reply to: Wood adhesives used by Miles and Percival #853425
    ericmunk
    Participant

    Could very well be Aerolite, with either clear, pink or green hardener. Difficult to say without having seen the glue, but Aerolite was very common in those days for British aircraft manufacturing.

    ericmunk
    Participant

    You’re not my ex CI are you? I was always getting into trouble over the spelling of the Barge’s name – It would appear I failed to learn. :p
    Incidentally, we rarely referred to VX275 by her serial, she was (and will always remain for me), ‘Mrs Hepple’. This was the result of the presentation plaque in the cockpit which recorded her presentation by one Mrs F D Hepple.

    That would be Mrs F.H. Heppell (sic, according to Horizons, the History of the Air Cadets) from Maidenhead who had started a fundraising campaign for a T21 for the Berkshire Cadets, and which aircraft was presented by H.A. Benyon, Lord Lieutenant for Berkshire, to Flt. Lt. J.A. West (OC of C123 EGS at White Waltham) in late March 1948.

    Having checked my logbooks I am fairly certain that there is no Aeronut 2008 I have solo’ed, so I am probably not your CFI 😉

    ericmunk
    Participant

    To add more confusion to the T21 orientated thread drift, VX275 the RAFM’s T21 was built as a civilian T21 not as a Sedburgh TX1, being presented to the Air Cadets a year before the first Sedburghs arrived. However she had a number of rebuilds during her 33 year career so is probably more Sedburgh now. Although her mainwheel box was smaller than other Sedburghs and you had to remember not to lift the tail as high as the others so as to prevent the skid digging in.

    Indeed, looking through the manufacturer’s mod-list, it would appear that Mod 12 (wheel ground clearance) had initially not been carried out, but was probably only done at a later date (if at all). Incidently, mods 1 (triangular access panel), 10 (liftings holes aft fuselage), 11 (modified elevator trailing edges), 14 (markings), 15 (T&S), 36 (sprung tail skid), 40 (picketing rings), 41 (ballast weight) at least seem to have been carried out afterwards, and probably many more minor mods as well when/if components were changed during her lifetime (wings, etc). No two T21’s are alike, even not service aircraft… And the mod-list is a long one!

    Interestingly, the official RAF aircraft manuals refer to the aircraft as the ‘Sedbergh TX Mk. 1 light glider’, not Sedburgh as often seen. It was named after the school at Sedbergh I seem to remember.

    ericmunk
    Participant

    The listing I used was from the NMS’s own website…

    http://www.nms.ac.uk/national-museum-of-flight/discover-the-museum/our-aircraft/aircraft-location/

    I did not mean to be critical. It seems to be a general problem with museums, who tend to pay less attention to glider history than to other aircraft in their collection, and historical knowledge of them is not available to the extent seen with motorized aircraft. As I said, it is somewhat of an unglamourous (but certainly not less interesting!) part of aviation history, and mistakes are easily made.

    Incidently, the Swedish aircraft was actually last registered BGA.1014, the former SE-SHK.

    ericmunk
    Participant

    Slingsby T.21A (Sedbergh TX.1) Se-SHK in deep storage.

    Incidently, this is a T.21b, not an A-model. Only one ‘A’ was built and it is no longer with us. Not a Sedbergh TX.1 either, since this particular aircraft was never used by the military, but delivered new to a civilian customer.

    ericmunk
    Participant

    NEPTUNE!

    Not wanting to spoil the fun, but they do have a Neptune.

    in reply to: V-1 Replica #857055
    ericmunk
    Participant

    Here’s your Tempest: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSV33LlUaqU

    Not sure where to put the guns though…

    ericmunk
    Participant

    I wondered what surviving aircraft would be candidates for inclusion within the RAF Museum collection

    Any of the missing ATC gliders would be great. A wartime Slingsby T.7 or T.8 stands out. They are cheap, and available. Slightly newer, a Slingsby Venture, on which many learnt to fly. Ugly as hell, but they are slowly disappearing from the scene and are now still available cheap and stock.

Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 1,519 total)