Award for understatement of the year goes to:
‘.. Unfortunately, I couldn’t continue with the search as I was abducted by militants..’
I seem to recall that the short Disney movie ‘Amazing Stories – The Mission’ was inspired by such a story.
Sorry, can’t see any bears here. But I do see Doc, one of the Seven Dwarfs dropping little bombs. Doc was I believe a mascotte of 300 Squadron who operated Wellingtons? Could be wrong here, but maybe somebody more knowledgable could correct me.
It’s likely that if nobody had contacted them, it could be scrapped or moved without any paperwork.
Destroying or taking away an item (let alone an aircraft) without the owner (let alone USAFM) being aware? I am sure there’s one or two legal issues there to bite you in your backside…
Nope, neither do I. I have two servicable 5007 wheel rims with bearings though, so that’s covered for the current restoration. They too are pretty hard to find in working order.
Just the tyre, square anti-shimmy. Looks post-war too.
Although contemporary Czech sources are hard to find (translated), there’s a fair bit on the web. And, diving into the story, there may be more to it than just the Bata’s fleeing. And it would seem I was a bit too fast saying the Bata family themselves used the L-10: it was their general manager and some other executives on what appears to be a business trip. Remember that Poland was still a free country at that time.
More info on Bata’s pilots and the L-10’s escape to Poland: http://issuu.com/martfumedia/docs/the_bata_pilots_-_final_draft
And the name of pilot and some passengers here: https://fcafa.wordpress.com/2012/03/01/oldrich-dolezal/
Whirlwind is 5.5 by 4
In that case I have a bit of Whirlwind here of my own, a 5.5×4 (which admittedly came from a DHC-2 judging by the production date).
Hi ericmunk,
My AP is a mid-war one so I can only speak about 1942-ish with confidence.
I would think the tailwheel size/tyre remained the same for most of those types, except maybe the Firefly – it seems to have had several combinations of mainwheel and tailwheel as the airframe was developed. You’d have to consult the Vol. Is. They have quite a few at Kew.
Thank you, AM. The list of types should give me a general direction in which to look.
I have a tailwheel that has been re stamped for use on a Slingsby – I will search it out.
That would be good, David. Thank you.
Twin pioneer Tailwheel tyres. The remaining stocks were hoovered up for a couple of Comper Swift replicas.
The closest useful tyre I have seen is a harrier outrigger tyre though it is a bit smaller and has a higher ply rating. Might work for a glider though.
A good lead too, that Twin Pioneer. Problem with higher plyrates (and increased stiffness) is the higher loads on airframe glue joints. Heavy landings especially are an issue, and can then more easily result in structural glue joint damage, which can be very hard to spot. The Aerolite glue used in the gliders in question is much better than the Kaurit or Casein glues, but still susceptible to failures. It is starting to become a widespread issue in the maintenance and conservation of vintage gliders, often requiring the rebuild of substantial airframe sections.
Indeed, arguments pro and con are endless. And the Bata museum is a very fitting place for this particular aircraft (since the family used this one to escape the Nazi invasion of their country).
There is a couple of good threads on aircraft originality on this forum, I am sure you are aware of these? This Lockheed 10 would seem to be very original indeed, with little components changed or replaced over the years.
PS: the last ‘airworthy’ aircraft I pulled out of a museum (and which had been flying right up to inclusion in the museum), required a two-year restoration due to glue deterioration, storage damage, improper display supports, visitor handling damage, etc. -> displaying – even under cover – is no guarantee for the long term survival of an airframe. As is flying it. But I prefer the latter 😉
Yes, they are impossible to get new. No demand. Latest production run I came across was 1973…
Try checking the rear ends of any Blenheims, Lysanders, Typhoons, Whirlwinds, Walrus, Albacores or Fireflys that you come across.
That is very helpful, AM. Do all of these have the 6.00 by 4? Or just certain marks? (I’ll have a bit of a hard time finding back ends of Whirlwind though!)
Not wishing to open that can of worms again, but museums burn down too.
Maintenance-wise there is nothing better for an aircraft than it being kept in airworthy condition…